He believes that she women will lose support from their husbands and the right for child support. This is understandable worry on his part. He just wants women to be taking care of, but he can’t see the bigger picture on why it is important
Until only fifty years ago or so, women had to "behave nice" to men in order to be selected by men and supported by them because for thousands of years societies have prohibited women from becoming self-sufficient. Woman had a choice between complying with male standards of beauty and behavior and submissiveness for marriage, remain in her father's care, or suffer in poverty, prostitution or mental asylums. Today, women are not dependent on men for survival because with legal protections, they have equal opportunity to become self-sufficient. The definition of the modern woman today would be independence and choice. If a woman is indepen...
According to family who are against this state that everyone should be parents even if they don’t have knowledge. In other words, these people believe that everyone should be parents without a license. I disagree with this parent’s view that everyone should become a parent whenever they want because there have been cases showing that some people mistreat their kids or abuse of them emotional, sexually and physically. Parents who disagree with this idea are right to argue that having a child is a natural part of human’s life, but they exaggerate when they claim that everyone should have a kid even if they don’t have the budgets. This is a problem because there are many kids suffering because some parents abuse the children or the parents are not mentally and economically stable to afford the best care for the kid.
The women were not looked at as very smart either, as Robinson explained that her paymaster asked if she knew how to write. This was before women had any rights, such as voting rights, but this was a big step in women becoming economically independent. With money comes the advantages of spending it. Now that women had their own money, they could spend it on whatever they wanted to. They had never had the freedom to do this before, another new thing for women.
Due to the preconception that women are supposed to be submissive, society continues to prevent them from being dominant in the workplace. Traditionally women are supposed to be housewives and nurture their children, overtime these views have changed. In todays society not only are women able to be mothers but they can also work outside of their homes. Women, who are considered single mothers, do every job whether at home or at the workplace. Men see women as inferior because until the about the twentieth century women began to gain just a tad bit of independence.
Even though, without with their husbands, they still could live well. Also, many men want to married with education women because they want women to help them with their financial jobs. In conclusion, women’ status was very low at the ancient society because they must stay at home and took after their husband, father and sons. They must build the virtue figure and did well jobs at home and couldn’t charge the family affairs. For increasing the women’s status, they must accept the education and don’t rely on others.
Gallagher made claims from her personal life on how raising a child would be easier with a mother and father. But Rauch contradicted her using no proof or personal experience. Also Rauch claimed that people should use the golden rule. But if we go by this logic can’t we say that if someone has committed a crime, we shouldn’t send them to jail because we wouldn’t want to send ourselves to jail? Because of Rauch’s faulty logic and rash claims, Gallagher has created the stronger case.
Women had not only been denied the voting rights and the lack of education before the nineteenth century, they had also been restricted the right to own property. Women who were married were basically owned by their husbands, up until the mid nineteenth century, so they had no regulations with money or their property (Hermes 1). If you were unmarried, however, you were allowed to be owner of property, but when they married the women became property of the man (Talbott 1). As stated previously before, women who were not married were allowed to vote as well as hold property, but a small amount of women did. Marriage was a disadvantage for the women, because they lost most of the rights they had previously.
Back in her days, the opportunities for women were always limited and the only thing that women could do was to become housewives. People were very conservative to the idea of the traditional role of a man and a woman. Men are always the provider and women are always the caregiver. Men held more power because of the fact that they earned money. It is hard for people to lose the conservative idea because the idea was around since the beginning of the era.
In chapter two it lists the inequalities that women faced: until the 1920’s, they couldn’t vote in America, until the 1930’s they couldn’t hold a passport in their own name. With both positive and negative freedoms, women have the right to now have a choice as to what kind of work or actions they wish to do, but nothing against their own will. Gender relations between men and women can also be applied to positive freedom. With positive freedom, both women and men have “freedom to rather than freedom from” (48). They can choose to do whatever kind of work they want.