Why We Should Not Be Allowed In Hockey Essay

479 Words1 Page

Have you ever been to a hockey game and a fight broke out? Seeing the reaction of the fans around you makes the game even more exhilarating. What if fighting couldn’t be allowed in hockey anymore? Fighting in hockey should not be allowed, because it glorifies violence, sets a bad example for kids, and leads to concussions, mental health, and potentially even death.
Fighting exemplifies and praises violence. Fighting creates a culture in which fighting is respected, valued, and looked at in a way to solve conflict. When the use of violence is approved, and legitimized, hockey players are more likely to later perform other forms of violence. When violence is glorified, it only advertises fighting as a good thing and makes hockey players more likely to fight, or look to other forms of violence later on in life, outside of hockey.
Fighting at the professional level sets a bad example for kids. Young players have tried to imitate the tactics used by professionals, …show more content…

Allowing fighting makes the sport safer overall by holding players accountable. Referees often miss contact plays while play is going on. Retaliation by fighting prevents more of those aggressive plays from happening. Combat within the game serves as a deterrent to hurting star players because aggressors know there will be payback. Without fighting, more open body shots would occur, making the game much more harmful.
While this may be true, fighting in hockey leads to concussions, mental health, and sometimes even death. Ten percent of all concussions are in hockey. Fighting leads to a number of medical conditions, as well as heavy uses of pain medication. In 2011, Derek Boogaard died from chronic traumatic encephalopathy, or repeated head injuries. If fighting in hockey continues, there may be even more life long, and fatal issues that hockey players will have to suffer

Open Document