Why Was Abraham Lincoln Called A Great Emancipator

1579 Words4 Pages

Abraham Lincoln was not pursuing the right course of action when he signed the Emancipation Proclamation in 1863. It is indicated that Lincoln had second guesses regarding his move through signing the deal to end slavery. This is indicated by the fact that Abraham Lincoln was considering convincing Jefferson Davis who, at the time, was committed to freeing the southern states. His dedication is part of the reason why Lincoln’s title of “great emancipator” has meaning. Since then, Abraham has been associated with having played a key role in ending slavery in America. Even though Lincoln is associated with ending slavery, it is said that he was more opposed to the idea of the disintegration of the Union and if he had a chance to select between support for the union and ending slavery, he would have opted for the Union as his choice. The idea that Lincoln would have chosen to be in the same camp with Jefferson is a clear testimony that his signing the Emancipation Proclamation was not the best action (Carrington 570). …show more content…

On the other hand, Davis reluctance in giving up southern independence played a significant role in establishing a basis for slave trade abolition. Other reasons that oppose the signing of Emancipation Proclamation include Abraham’s close associates who considered the move as arguable, since it was not in his position to abolish slave trade without adequately compensating the citizens. Abraham Lincoln seemed to have a well-thought-out decision before he signed the Emancipation Proclamation because the bill motivated the black in the North to win the

Open Document