Why Should Books Be Banned
opinionated Essay
1037 words
Banning books goes against the First Amendment, it restricts learning, and it discourages creative and critical thinking. Banned books are books that have been censored by an authority – a government, a library, or a school system. Banning a book means having it removed from our libraries and school systems. They say that books are ban to protect people – mostly children – from the difficult ideas and information that are written in them. It seems to be that most of these ideas are too frightening or controversial for others to have to endure. But when you sit to think about it, banning a book often just makes the children want to go and read it and find out exactly why it is banned in the first place. The First Amendment gives us our right …show more content…
In this essay, the author
- Explains that banning books goes against the first amendment, restricts learning, and discourages creative and critical thinking. banned books are books that have been censored by an authority.
- Explains that the first amendment gives us our right to free speech, which includes the rights to read and write books that may be too violent, offensive or hateful for others.
- Opines that while the first amendment gives us the right to free speech, some people believe that censorship is needed in some cases.
- Opines that a ban on books restricts learning and violates the academic freedom and diversity of thought.
- Opines that it is not against the law for a book to be challenged or banned because it's the right for people to see them as inappropriate.
- Explains that book censorship is the suppression of books considered objectionable, harmful, sensitive, or inconvenient.
- Opines that some books are too advanced and inappropriate for schools to have in their libraries. some believe that it is wrong for a child to read books with sex, drugs and racism in them.
- Opines that book banning violates academic freedom and diversity of thought, but some think it is wrong for children to learn about sex, and slavery.
Some children’s books are just way too inappropriate for certain age groups and should be taken from the libraries and out of reach for them even if it is a learning material. However, it is not against the law for a book to be challenged or banned because it is the right for people to see them as inappropriate. Should they challenge a book and they provide reasonable information and reason on why it needs to be ban, then it will be removed. “Never underestimate a blank piece of paper in the right hands, because words are how we live – and for some of us, they’re why we live” (Leigh, 2014). Book censorship is the suppression of books considered objectionable, harmful, sensitive, or inconvenient. Most people who want the books ban say that the books need to be censored because of sexuality, race, drugs, or social standings. However, books make you think, fantasize, and use your imagination. When you read you end up with a larger vocabulary, and a better thinking process. When a book is banned it discourages creativeness, and critical …show more content…
Confucius says “No matter how busy you may think you are, you must find time for reading, or surrender yourself to self-chosen ignorance” (Yarbrough, 2012). The First Amendment protects our rights of free speech, but people do not respect that and challenge it. Book banning violates academic freedom and diversity of thought, but some think it is wrong for children to learn about sex, and slavery. While book banning discourages creativeness and critical thinking, libraries have the right to remove a book if it is put on the banned list. So think about how you feel about books and what they mean to you. I love books and hate the fact that one would ever be removed from a shelf, no matter how “inappropriate” people may think they are. So, again, think about it from a reader’s point of view on how book banning IS against our First Amendment, how it DOES restrict learning, and how it DOES discourage children’s creativeness and their critical
Related
- analytical
- opinionated
- explanatory
- argumentative
- The Banning of Books in American Schoolsanalytical essayCountries worldwide actively call for the banning of books that are found to be politically inconvenient, religiously awkward, or embarrassing in one form or another. But for writers like Russia's Vasily Grossman, a book's ban means far more than just a dip in sales. In 1961, he pleaded with the Soviet censors, "I am physically free, but the book to which I have dedicated my life is in jail." (Merkelson). A book represents an idea, thus limiting access to a book is banning the representation of an idea. The banning of books in American schools should not be allowed, because banning books will prevent students from learning the reason for the controversy and alternate viewpoints they can come to on their own.
In this essay, the author
- Opines that limiting access to a book is banning the representation of an idea. the ban of books in american schools will prevent students from learning the reason for the controversy.
- Explains that books are banned with the best intention to protect others, often children, from difficult ideas and information. harriet the spy, a light in the attic, and shel silverstein are examples.
- Explains that books were destroyed to suppress individualism in the interest of the collective or purging intellectuals.
- Explains that homosexuality is a common target for book banning. the american family association is an anti-homophobic group.
- Argues that the us constitution never mentions the rights they claim to hold over the books, and the bible doesn't call for the disentrance of others.
1054 wordsRead More - Censorship: The Importance Of Banning Books In Schoolsopinionated essayFor nine years, from 2000 to 2009 the top challenged book included the entire Harry Potter series. Books have been banned by schools, governments, and libraries since the beginning of time in different places all around the world. Starting in 1982, Book Banning Week was created to try to bring up the importance of this form of censorship. Books are unjustly banned when in reality, students should self-censor their reading, the First Amendment should protect books against this, and these books are important teaching materials.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that books have been banned by schools, governments, and libraries since the beginning of time. book banning week started in 1982 to bring up the importance of this form of censorship.
- Opines that students should be able to self-censor their reading. older-aged students are exposed to most of the controversial topics discussed in banned books.
- Explains that the first amendment protects book titles against being banned by the matter of personal opinion. many court cases have enforced this cause.
- Explains that classic books are banned frequently because they challenge the common thought of the time. the national council of teachers of english states that teachers choose books based on literary quality, appropriateness, usefulness and breadth of coverage.
- Opines that even with these reasons, some reasons to ban books exist; for example, the books are inappropriate for young children, they teach children bad habits, and they can go against religious groups.
- Opines that student self-censoring, the first amendment, and being important teaching materials should prevent books from becoming banned, but this still is a problem waiting to be solved today.
914 wordsRead More - The Censorship Of Books: Why Should Books Be Ban?opinionated essay“The more that you read, the more things you will know. The more that you learn the more places you’ll go.”-Dr. Seuss. What Dr. Seuss’s statement is telling us is that books have given us knowledge about ideas, life, and the world. One of the greatest inventions of mankind is a book. A book is a set of printed sheets that are put together fill with information that people read about. Books have been around with us since ages from generations to generations. It is all around the world with different cultures and languages, books have given people the joy of story, information, and knowledge. Everyone should have the right to read whatever book they are seem interested. Well, it is not the case; there are some people out there trying to challenge books from being ban. It is ridiculous that books are being taken away from readers. Today, books are still currently being challenged or banned. This type of doing is censorship. This is a problem that people need to look at and think about. Books are in school, library, in our homes yet they are too much for the people. Why are books so sensitive for readers to be challenged? There are two set of sides to this issue, one side are the people that wants to remove the books and challenged them to be ban, the other side are the one that oppose the banning of books, allowing to read whatever they want. Which side is right? This leads to the question as to why books are currently being challenged or banned. How does banning books relate to censorship and what are some solutions that can solve the problem of banning books?
In this essay, the author
- Explains that dr. seuss' statement is telling us that books have given us knowledge about ideas, life, and the world.
- Analyzes how blume's article, "excerpt from places i never mean to be: original stories by censored writers," describes her loving about books when she was little.
- Opines that there is no controversy about banning video games, since they contain explicit violence, sexual explicit, and adult content.
- Explains that banning books violates the first amendment, which affirms freedom of individuals, speech, and press. the board of education v. pico case is about the school boards trying to remove books from the library.
- Explains that censorship is a system of suppressing things that is unacceptable, harmful, and immoral.
- Opines that the naysayers who support banning books believe that it is too much for a people to know about things that they should not know.
- Proposes a book rating system, similar to the rating systems for tv and movies, to help parents decide what's appropriate for their children.
- Explains that books are the most important tool in our human life. they are created for a reason: to read and think deeply about what is happening inside those descriptive words.
1871 wordsRead More - Book Censorship in American High Schoolsexplanatory essayBook banning has a long history and has made both positive and negative impact on readers. People have been trying to stop books from being banned, but there are also people that are trying to ban books to protect their children. Many books have been challenged and even banned because of the “inappropriate” content the books contain such as profanity. Books have started to get censored since the 1500’s and has threatened many cultures. The people who ban and censor books think that they are protecting the readers from the information, but it is secluding the readers from getting more ideas. This creates a negative impact on the readers, especially high school students. People don’t realize that book censorship limits the way they view the world. Many books have been banned in American high schools because of political, religious, sexual, and social reasons. Book banners and parents should be more lenient in what the book expresses because it teaches readers, such as high school students, many lessons that will help them in life.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that book banning has a long history and has made both positive and negative impact on readers.
- Explains that books are banned because of political, religious, sexual, and social reasons, while people's beliefs are a reason for some books being banned.
- Explains that book censorship has a long history and it has affected many cultures.
- Explains that banned books have shaped american high schools in regards of what the students could read. parents should not complain about books that their children could not understand.
- Opines that parents should not judge what their children are reading in school, but should gather students to vote whether or not a book should be banned after they have read it.
- Explains that harper lee's to kill a mockingbird is one of the most frequently banned books in american high schools.
- Analyzes how the book, the catcher in the rye by j.d. salinger, is banned in american high schools.
- Explains that judy blume's "forever" depicts marital sex, which is intimacy, and parents don't want their children to learn about it.
- Opines that books help students create a different world in their minds, which helps their creativity, and could help the decisions they make in real life situations.
- Explains that banning books affects high school students because books open people's mind to a new world.
- Explains campbell, colin, "book banning in america." new york times.
1974 wordsRead More - Banned Books And Why Are They Banned?explanatory essayBanned Books and Why are They Banned? Books are written for the pleasures of people and came from the hard work and efforts of writers. A writer’s story is mostly based off of themselves and it is known that you will know a person much better once you have read their writings. So why are some books banned?
In this essay, the author
- Explains that books are written for the pleasures of people and came from the hard work and efforts of writers. the twilight series, to kill a mockingbird, and the hunger games have faced removal from library bookshelves.
- Explains that banned books week is an act of propaganda. most of the banned books symbolize something political or an author’s complaint for the ways of life.
- Explains that banning books is like the first amendment where it is a type of freedom of speech or act of propaganda.
- Explains that the idea of banning books is to protect our children from having their minds be poisoned of fictional ideas from fantasy books, safe from violence, protected from adult contents that are too early for them to know about.
786 wordsRead More - Book Banning and First Amendment Rightanalytical essayWhat is a banned book? A banned book is a book that has been removed from the shelves; it could be from a library, classroom, or even the bookstore because of its content. A book could be banned for many reasons, but it could be banned because it contains sex, violence, inappropriate language, religious viewpoints, witch craft, and many more things because other people deem it inappropriate. When someone bans a book they ban it for everyone else too.
In this essay, the author
- Analyzes how ellen hopkins' "crank" is interesting and grabs the reader's attention. it talks a lot about drugs, alcohol, and sex, but it is based on something that can happen in real life.
- Analyzes how kristina lost her friends, made new contacts, and was willing to do anything to get meth. she met two handsome guys who raped her.
- Explains that a banned book contains sex, violence, inappropriate language, religious viewpoints, witchcraft, and many more things because other people deem it inappropriate. censorship has been going on for centuries.
- Explains that ala's website promotes the freedom to choose or to express one’s opinions even if that opinion might be considered unorthodox or unpopular and stresses the importance of ensuring the availability of those viewpoints
- Argues that people shouldn't ban books based on its content because everyone has different tastes in books or they just want to expand their knowledge and learn new things.
1699 wordsRead More - Censorship of Books in Schoolopinionated essayIn schools around the nation, many books have been banned from the teaching curriculum. Some of them deserve to be banned due to the explicit content only suited for adults. Some books like the Harry Potter series, The Catcher in the Rye, The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn and The Hunger Games. Granted, there are language issues in Catcher and Huckleberry Finn, but that language exists everywhere. The censorship should not be as strict as it is because many great books are being banned that students should be reading in order to gain an understanding on who some great writers were. Some of the banned books should be reconsidered on whether they should be censored or not.
In this essay, the author
- Analyzes how the profane language in the catcher in the rye forced the book to be banned from schools.
- Explains salinger, j. d., the catcher in the rye. new york: little, brown and company, 1951.
- Opines that the censorship of books should not be as strict as it is because they contain things like vulgar language, sexual references, drug use, or extremely violent details.
- Opines that language is a major reason for censoring books like the harry potter series because of the witch-craft.
949 wordsRead More - What are Banned Books? Fahrenheit 451analytical essayMany books have been questioned and challenged. Even as far as to banning them. But what exactly is a banned book and why are they banned? A banned book is a book that has been censored by an authority, a government body, a library, or a even school system. A book that has been banned is actually removed from a library or school system. The actual contextual reasons as to banning them is use of explicit violence, gore, sexuality, explicit language, religion, or dark times in history. On the non-contextual side of the reason why they are banned books are usually because with the best intentions to protect people, frequently children, from difficult philosophies and information. Teachers, or even more common adults, often censor books from children if they feel that the books have maniacal or controversial ideas in them. In some scenarios, those who are censoring books think that a book might be appropriate for a certain, or several groups in society. A book that might be perfectly fine for a ninth grader might easily be horrendous or confusing to a fourth grader. Thus having them exposed and influenced to thinking a certain way and act upon what they have just read. Well at least that’s what people think is going to happen anyways. But honestly, reading books of any genre gives us knowledge, entertainment, and imagination so therefore no books or novels should be banned and is ultimately dependent on the reader’s choice.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that a banned book is one that has been censored by an authority, government body, library, or school system. the non-contextual reasons are to protect people, often children, from difficult philosophies and information.
- Analyzes how the novel's protagonist is guy montag, a "fireman" in an unspecified futuristic society where he and his fellow fireman start fires, rather than put them out.
- Narrates how montag meets clarisse mcclellan, a seventeen-year-old bohemian girl who happens to be his neighbor. after their first encounter, montag returns home to find his wife overdosed.
- Narrates how montag becomes dissatisfied with his life and work the more he talks with clarisse and ponders if books aren't so bad. he feels blazing anger and becomes dangerously rebellious.
- Analyzes how montag finds an ex-professor named faber, whom he meets in the park, who helps him fight the firemen. beatty pokes at montag by quoting contradictory passages from the same books.
- Narrates how montag makes his way to faber's house, where he watches his own chase scene on tv. guy mourns in the river before bumping into ex-professors and other intellectual people.
- Analyzes how ray bradbury's "burning books" is a story about burning books, which symbolizes that the government is trying to suppress freedom.
- Analyzes how the burning of the christian book, the bible, is a lame excuse for disobeying god. it takes persuasion to tide someone away from their faith.
- Analyzes how fahrenheit 451 showed explicit words and contents strictly not suitable for young readers. it has banned in many schools and even the governments of other countries.
925 wordsRead More - Banned books truly do deserve to be inside of school systems. They are classics that should never have been taken away from the schools. Students should have the privilege and right to be allowed to read them once they reach a certain maturity level around their middle school years. It is absolutely wrong to hold students back and not let them learn the valuable life lessons that lie within the pages of every banned book.
In this essay, the author
- Opines that our society has tried to protect the young minds of children by banning certain books from school systems.
- Opines that banning books is not necessary because it goes against the constitution of the united states of america. censors have zero respect for the rights of students and teachers.
- Opines that censors want to control the minds of young people. students who read learn to think and think. those we see often question.
- Explains that censors want to control the minds of the young and keep them from learning about life lessons. they are attempting to hide students away from reality and act like our world is a perfect place.
- Opines that it would be wrong to expose children in grade school to banned books because it is disturbing for children to read about.
- Argues that catcher in the rye contains explicit language, sexual content, and suicide. holden caulfield's language may be offensive to some, but it displays his age and teenage behaviors.
- Opines that the sexual content in catcher in the rye is not even a major deal. there are no sexual encounters, but only sexual references.
- Analyzes how holden caulfield mentioned how he wanted to commit suicide, and how james castle killed himself by jumping out of a window.
- Opines that the catcher in the rye contains three strong materials that can be offensive to young children, but teenagers are exposed to these situations everyday.
- Opines that banned books deserve to be in school systems, and students should have the privilege and right to read them once they reach a certain maturity level.
759 wordsRead More - Banned Booksargumentative essayBook Banning The first amendment of the U.S. Constitution states, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances (Buchanan).” With the banning and the challenging of books all over the U.S. I believe that our first amendment is being jeopardized. We should be allowed to read whatever we want to read it is our right according to the first amendment in the U.S. Constitution with freedom of speech. Every year in the United States we have books being banned and challenged by many people who do not like the contents of books.
In this essay, the author
- Disagrees with rebecca's argument that the american library association recommends books for young readers, but these recommendations reflect their liberal values.
- Opines that rebecca hagelin is attacking the american library association for the so-called poor choice in reading material.
- Analyzes how rebecca hagelin mentions the parent's responsibility in what their children read.
- Describes brian, buchanan j., "about the first amendment."
- Describes the gale encyclopedia of childhood and adolescence, edited by jerome kagan and susan b. gall.
- Argues that the first amendment of the u.s. constitution is being jeopardized with the banning and the challenging of books all over the us.
- Disagrees with rebecca's statement that reading isn't always good for kids. poor reading skills are at increased risk of medical and economic as well as social difficulties in later life.
1205 wordsRead More