Why Is Animal Testing Cruel And Inhumane

466 Words1 Page

Animals have been used as test subjects for discovering the functions of living organisms for centuries. According to ancient Greek writing, physician-scientists such as Aristotle and Herophilus performed such experiments on animals. Animals such as mice, cats, and dogs, were thought as they lacked intelligence, so the notions of justice did not apply to them. Aristotle demonstrated that arteries contained blood instead of air by dissecting animals without pity or compassion. Animal testing is cruel and inhumane, therefore animal testing needs to stop. Notably, animal testing is extremely cruel and inhumane. To explain, animal testing refers to procedures performed on living animals for purposes of research into basic biology and diseases. The procedures performed include forced chemical exposure, periods of physical restraints and inflictions of wounds and pain. According to Australian philosopher, Peter Singer, “The question is not, Can they reason?, nor, Can they talk? But, Can they suffer?” (“Animal Rights”). Given that animals can suffer, Singer argues that humans have a moral obligation to minimize or avoid causing such sufferings. Certainly, since animals have the basic principles of rights, such cruel and inhumane …show more content…

For example, in 1950, the sleeping pill called Thalidomide, caused over 10,000 babies to be born with major deformation. The reason behind this was inaccurate testing results. Generally speaking, animals are genetically different from humans, meaning our bodies are designed to function in different ways. Therefore, using animals to test human medical products may lead to an inaccurate result and cause people to suffer. Again, what is the point of putting animals through such terrible environments of testing, if the tested product is not one hundred percent guaranteed to be safe for people to

Open Document