The Harm of Animal Testing
analytical Essay
1115 words
Throughout history, animal testing has played an important role in leading to new discoveries and human benefit. However, what many people forget are the great numbers of animals that have suffered serious harm during the process of animal testing. Animal testing is the use of animals in biological, medical, and psychological studies. The development and enhancement of medical research has been based on the testing of animals. There are many questions being asked if animal research is good or not or if the benefit for us is way greater the abuse of animals. Doing tests on animals can help find ways to cure diseases, but testing on them is wrong. Although we want to find cures for diseases to help many people, testing on animals not only brutally hurts them but it also denies the animals the rights they have. January 1st, 1959, W.M.S. Russell and R.L. Burch describes how there should not be a lot of animal testing. Russell and Burch publish “The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique,” which introduces the principles of Refinement, Reduction, and Replacement which are called the Three R’s. Reduction explained that people should use fewer animals in experiments. Replacement explained the use of non-animal alternatives over animals whenever possible. Refinement explained how people should use techniques to alleviate or minimize the invasive procedures that could potentially cause pain, suffering or distress, and to the enhancement animal welfare for the animals still used. The testing of animals have been going on for a long time and even some people have tried to help animals have less extreme conditions while being tested on. There are cases when animals are being treated badly, The Huntington Life Science was beating the anim... ... middle of paper ... ... experimentation/animal-experiments-overview.aspx. PETA.org. N.p., n.d. Web. 11 Oct. 2013. Clemmitt, Marcia. "Animal Rights." CQ Researcher by CQ Press. N.p., 10 Jan. 2010. Web. 27 Oct. 2013. "Debatewise." Debatewise. N.p., n.d. Web. 27 Oct. 2013. Manchester Evening News. . http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater manchester-news/for-and-against-animal-testing-693965. "For and Against: Animal Testing." Men. N.p., 28 Aug. 2012. Web. 11 Oct. 2013. Sherrow, Michelle. http://prime.peta.org/2011/07/libby. "Life After the Laboratory: Libby’s Story." PETA Prime Life After the Laboratory Libby’s Story Comments. N.p., 11 July 2011. Web. 11 Oct. 2013. Simonziegs97's. http://www.timetoast.com/timelines/38507. "History of Animal Testing." Timetoast. N.p., n.d. Web. 11 Oct. 2013. "What's Wrong with Animal Testing." Politics.co.uk. N.p., n.d. Web. 27 Oct. 2013.
In this essay, the author
- Explains alistair currie is policy adviser for people for the ethical treatment of animals (peta).
- Explains clemmitt, marcia, "animal rights." cq researcher, n.p., 10 jan. 2010.
- Explains that animal testing has played an important role in leading to new discoveries and human benefit, but many people forget the great numbers of animals that have suffered serious harm during the process.
- Argues that animal testing is wrong and that it should not be allowed, since there is a substitution, on the account of testing on animals.
Related
- argumentative
- opinionated
- explanatory
- analytical
- The Pros And Cons Of Animal Testingargumentative essayEach year, over 100 million animals are burned, crippled, and abused for animal testing just in the US. Even then, that number does not include 90% of animals that are used in the tests. Animal testing is defined as “procedures performed on living animals for purposes of research,” by Humane Society International. This should be banned, or at the bare minimum reduced by laws that are enforced, and there are many reasons why. Some of the reasons include the unreliability and impracticability of animal testing, the cruel environments the animals are in, and the unecessity of animal testing.
In this essay, the author
- Opines that animal testing should be banned or at the bare minimum reduced by laws that are enforced.
- Explains that although many animals share dna with humans, animal test results are highly unreliable — anatomic, metabolic, and cellular differences between animals and humans make them poor models for humans.
- Explains that only 1.16% of human illnesses can be found in animals, which reduces the reliability and practicality of animal testing.
- Argues that animal testing should be banned due to the cruel environments the animals have to face. the animal welfare act does not protect animals used in testing.
- Explains that animal testing is not the only way to see what will and won't harm humans. other alternatives include computer programs, synthetic skin, growing cells on petri dishes, and microfluidic chips.
- Concludes that animal testing is cruel and inhumane. millions of animals' lives are lost each year, and the basic needs of the animals used in these experiments are not met.
755 wordsRead More - Animal Testing Essayopinionated essayCurrent animal testing has been a contentious subject ever since it started off 150 years back. Although a lot of people discover animal testing inhumane and egoistic, it is a important factor to boost our understanding of medication and to improve our understanding of science. Animal testing, to some, is the way to ameliorating our level of living and preserving many lives, and therefore has many benefits. On the other hand, the negatives may not be passed, and scientists are constantly trying to decrease the damages with some methods they create in the process. Even so, to the dismay of numerous animal lovers in addition to those who are endeavoring for animal rights, animal testing will not be stopped every time soon because, for now, it is the most trustworthy form of testing that includes the safety of daily products we use more carefully than any other procedure.
In this essay, the author
- Opines that animal testing has been a contentious subject since it started 150 years ago. it is an important factor to boost our understanding of medication and science.
- Defines animal testing as tests performed on animals that advance scientific research and medicinal development. some animal tests are performed to better researchers knowledge on human and animal behavior, development, and biological functions.
- Explains that animals are used in research to improve scientific knowledge, create solutions to medical issues and ensure the safety of people, animals, and the environment.
- Analyzes the negative aspects of animal testing, such as the futile deaths of many animals because of the medication that are tested on animals switched to be toxic.
- Explains that peta, the largest animal rights organization in the world, strives every day to prevent animals from suffering.
- Explains focused examining, where one individual creature is focused instead of a large number of creatures.
- Explains that genomics is the testing of cells instead of animals, and selective animal tests are performed on the species whose organ most closely resembles the organ in the human body.
- Explains the three facts in animal research: reducing, replacing, and improvement. reducing means that researchers aspire to lower the number of animals used in testing.
- Explains that the body shop's products aren't tested on animals, which makes them want to buy humane products.
- Opines that animal testing is savage and inhumane, despite the benefits it has given, and the killing of innocent animals makes it sensible to some animal lovers.
- Opines that animal testing is the institution for dissolve challenging medical enigmas, even though technological advancement has reduced the number of animals used in tests.
1209 wordsRead More - Persuasive Essay On Animal Abuseexplanatory essayMany people that are in favor of animal testing say simply that the lives of people are more important than the lives of animals, and while it is unfortunate that sometimes animals must suffer and die, it is worth it if human lives are saved by this research. Thousands of years ago, humans began to use animals for the purpos...
In this essay, the author
- Explains that many forms of animal cruelty are not widely known by the majority of the human population, including animal testing, animal abuse, fur farming, vivisection, puppy mills, and many more.
- Opines that animal testing should be illegal because it is inhumane, unethical, and results cannot always be accurately compared to the results that would come from human beings.
- Opines that animal testing is a moral dilemma that each person must come to terms with on their own.
- Explains that animals are crammed into filthy sheds and beaten and/or branded into doing what their owners want them to do at slaughterhouses.
- Describes how the cows at the slaughterhouse peta did research on were treated no better. they were tied to poles, had their horns cut off, and were repeatedly branded.
- Explains that dog fighting is a sadistic contest in which two dogs that are specifically bred, conditioned, and trained to fight each other for the spectators' entertainment and gambling.
- Explains that vivisection and fur farming are closely related cruel actions that are performed for the benefit of humans. fur farms are dismal, filthy places where thousands of animals are kept in wire cages for their entire lives.
- Explains that puppy mills are a place where an abundance of dogs are sold with the thought of profit above the safety and well-being of the dogs.
- Opines that animal cruelty needs to be stopped because it is inhumane, unjust, and there is no need for it.
1344 wordsRead More - Ethical Effects Of Animal Testingopinionated essayAs quoted by Arthur Schopenhauer, “Universal compassion is the only guarantee of morality.” Animal testing is a topic of major interest and majorly problematic throughout the United States today. Animal testing is generally for a good cause, however the way the procedure is handled is completely wrong and unacceptable. For example, if dogs are a man’s best friend, why are 75,000 dogs tortured every year in the United States and given worms inside their bodies that will most definitely kill them, to be used for research? Even over 125,000 primates are shot for research alone in America every year and numbered off like victims of the Holocaust. Without a solution to regulate the severity of animal testing, America’s beloved pets could turn against human compassion and live long painful lives of fear and neglection. Being a pet owner like myself it is easy to feel the pain these animals go through, unaware of when it could be their turn to be brutally killed for scientific research. Just imagine if it was your cat, or dog, or horse, or whatever type of animal you may have, how would you feel, how would they feel? Ladies and gentleman, that is the question that needs to be asked when considering if the project is worth the detrimental effects it has on these poor animals, who do nothing but love their human “superiors.” The three topics I will be discussing today is the unnecessary cruelty involved in animal testing, how to regulate the process of animal testing to make it less inhumane, and the benefits of the solution and possible consequences that will occur if the solution is not implemented.
In this essay, the author
- Opines that animal testing is a topic of major interest and majorly problematic throughout the united states today.
- Explains that animals are force-fed experimental chemicals that sicken and kill them, while soldiers chop off lamb legs with axes without even providing the lamb with painkillers.
- Opines that animal testing is a major issue as it drifts away from basic principles of advancement into cruel and unusual punishment that can be avoided.
- Suggests ways to end animal testing cruelty, such as asking the food and drug administration to accept superior non-animal methods.
- Opines that if these problems aren't addressed, animal cruelty will expand and america's most innocent creatures will have to pay the price.
- Urges teachers to use alternative methods to dissect animals, use animals that died at their own will not from cruel testing, and make a change today.
- Urges people to take a stand in animal cruelty and defend the animals of the world.
1314 wordsRead More - Persuasive Essay On Animal Testingexplanatory essayFor many years, animal testing has been the main solution to test household products, food, chemicals, and pharmaceuticals. The term “animal testing” refers to the procedure performed on certain animals to determine if a certain product is safe. Most of these procedures done on the animal can cause a great amount of physical pain, and distress. Most animals die shortly after the experiment because so much pain was inflicted on their body. After the testing is done, the animals are left to suffer in cages. The different types of experiments performed on the animals are outrageous. There is even an alternative to animal testing, but scientist refuse to use it, and some people wonder if animals are even needed for medical research.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that animal testing has been the main solution to test household products, food, chemicals, and pharmaceuticals for many years.
- Explains that animals used in medical research include mice, fish, rats, rabbits, guinea pigs and non-human primates. animals are subjected to forced chemical exposure in toxicity testing, exposure to drugs, food and water deprivation, infliction of wounds to study healing.
- Explains that many big-name products on supermarket shelves and department store cosmetic counters have been tested on animals. these include avon, clinique, covergirl, dove, mac, nair, olay and old spice.
- Explains the draize test and the ld50 test, which are infamous for the intense pain and suffering they inflect upon experimental animals.
- Opines that animal testing is an alternative to human testing. the national research council envisions a not-so-distant future in which virtually all routine toxicity testing would be conducted in human cells or cell lines.
- Opines that there are alternatives to take the death of innocent animals out of laboratories. animals have the same amount of pain tolerance as humans, so why are animals suffering?
- Explains that 26 million animals are used every year in the united states for scientific testing and commercial testing. the american veterinary medical association defines animal pain as unpleasant sensory, and emotional experience perceived as arising from a specific region of the body.
- Explains that animal testing is expensive and wastes government research dollars. the humane society international compared different animal tests and the cost difference of the alternative.
- Explains that animal testing has a big cost to it, and we are funding it. laboratories have been using tax dollars to pay for equipment and other irrelevant items that are used on animals.
- States that the animal welfare act (awa) addresses the minimum standards of care for animals at research facilities, though it excludes the majority of animals used in research, testing, and education.
- Opines that animal testing has been a big issue for many years, but people have chosen to turn their head when animals were being killed. animals do not have the same genetics as humans, so we are wasting government money plus our tax money.
1667 wordsRead More - Pros And Cons Of Animal Testingexplanatory essayAccording to the California Biomedical Research Association, almost every medical advancement in the last 100 years is a direct result of animal testing and research. The use of animals has become standard procedure in a wide range of testing and experimentation, including product toxicity testing, biomedical and veterinary experiments, drug development and testing, and education. Major advancements in treating and understanding chronic conditions such as cancer, cystic fibrosis, malaria, and tuberculosis, have been achieved due to animal research. Also, the development of pacemakers, cardiac valve substitutes, and anesthetics are also direct results of the testing and observation of animals. On the other hand, many people believe that animal testing is cruel and inhumane. In many laboratories animals are subjected to force feeding, food and water deprivation, physical restraints, and infliction of pain. Because the animals cannot protect themselves, many people argue that exploiting animals to better the lives of humans is wrong and should not be permitted.
In this essay, the author
- Explains the pros and cons of animal testing, stating that the use of animals has become standard procedure in a wide range of testing and experimentation.
- Explains that animal testing is beneficial because it allows researchers to study the side effects of tests that are preformed over a whole lifespan, which would not be possible using human subjects.
- Explains that animal testing is beneficial, but most experiments involving animals are flawed, wasting the lives of the animal subjects.
- Explains that research animals are cared for by veterinarians and other animal specialists to ensure the well-being of the subjects. alternative testing methods can be used for research rather than animals.
- Opines that if there is an alternative way in getting the same test results, then animal testing should be avoided.
845 wordsRead More - Animal Testingexplanatory essayAlthough the use of animal testing is depleting, it is still necessary to address. New alternatives are rapidly developing and the cruel, inhumane experimentation done to animals is becoming widely known.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that using blood from human volunteers to determine if fever-causing contaminants in intravenous medicines is another way to save hundreds of thousands of animals each year from "pyrogen" tests.
- Opines that the gatt is a potential barrier to animal welfare. transitional law & contemporary problems.
- Explains that animal testing is a cruel and inhumane act against animals. the draize eye test is most commonly used on rabbits.
- Explains that the eu cosmetics directive has passed three bans on animal testing: testing, marketing, and importation. the only exemption is in the case of a specific human health problem.
638 wordsRead More - The Pros And Cons Of Animal Testinganalytical essayWhen it comes to the topic of animal cruelty, most of us will agree that animal testing has improved the quality of human life. Where this agreement usually ends, however, is on the question of whether or not there are alternative methods available to researchers. Whereas some are convinced that animal experiments don’t always predict human outcomes, others maintain that there are no alternatives to animal testing. My own view is that animal experimentation is necessary.
In this essay, the author
- Argues that the drug thalidomide is a good example of what can happen if scientists chose to test humans rather than animals first.
- Analyzes how botting and morrison's statement shows how animal testing has improved the life of humans.
- Argues that the foundation for biomedical research's argument is that a drug might work on cells in test tubes, but that doesn't mean it will work in humans.
- Argues that animal testing has improved the quality of human life, but there are alternative methods available to researchers. cohen acknowledges that at the time of the outbreak of polio, other methods were useless.
- Opines that scientists don't like the fact that they have to test animals, but have no other choice.
1289 wordsRead More - The Negatives of Animal Testinganalytical essayMany people may not realize that the majority of products in their own home have been tested on animals; from lipstick and shampoo to dish soap and foot powder. Even the white ink on an M&M has been tested on animals. To some, this statement may be alarming and even disturbing – to others it may not mean much at all. Either way, the debate over animal testing has gained much popularity in recent decades.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that the majority of products in their home have been tested on animals, from lipstick and shampoo to dish soap and foot powder.
- Explains that animal testing has been done since at least 500 bc; even aristotle experimented on animals for scientific reasoning. vivisection is when an organism is dissected while it is still alive.
- Argues that animal testing is unnecessary, inhumane, and unreliable.
- Opines that animal testing is unnecessary because of the similar biological systems between animals and humans. however, humans are very different from one another.
- Explains that animal testing is unnecessary due to advances in technology and alternative testing methods, such as in vitro and artificial human skin.
- Opines that animal testing is cruel and inhumane. animals are subjected to force feeding, starvation, burns, and decapitation.
- Analyzes how a monkey was photographed rescuing the puppy from the tsunami in japan. animals are smarter than most people think and feel love, fear, and pain. many religious traditions say that people should care for animals.
- Explains that animal testing is unreliable, and that some breakthroughs could have been made without testing them on animals. vioxx was proven to help mice and protect their heart, but when humans started using the drug, it caused thousands of heart attacks.
- Explains that some drugs/chemicals may work well on humans, but not on animals. aspirin was deadly when given to the animals during the experiment, while to humans it is a common, mild drug.
- Argues that the cons of animal testing outweigh the pros of it. it is not only unnecessary and unreliable, but it is also inhumane.
- Explains the rationality of animal testing, and the fact that purchasing a different product is pulling money from the pockets of companies and scientists.
- Opines that it is important to be informed on this because people make decisions every day and do not realize that they are supporting animal testing by buying these products.
1042 wordsRead More - Animal Testing Argument Essayanalytical essayEvery year about 100 million animals suffer through being poisoned, shocked, and burned for unsuccessful medical research. Some may believe that animal testing is a crucial part to medical research and should be used more frequently. Others believe the pain and suffering inflicted upon the animals is morally wrong and should not be done, no matter what benefits come from it.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that every year about 100 million animals suffer through being poisoned, shocked, and burned for unsuccessful medical research.
- Argues that animal testing that involves inflicting pain is always wrong. the similarities between chimps and humans genes are too medically useful to be wasted.
- Argues that pro-animal testing supporters will always argue that without animals, humans will have no subjects to test on. this number makes it clear that animal testing is far more destructive than it is effective.
- Opines that consent is one of the main factors that is pushing for the end of animal testing.
- Opines that animal research does not benefit humans enough to continue this massacre of beings that feel the same emotions as the everyday person.
831 wordsRead More