Why Do Politicians Support The Rich

680 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: The influence of pressure groups in politics

Businesses generated mass campaigns and increased their political giving, and since campaign costs went up, politicians were more attentive to the rich. This answers the question as to why politicians supported the rich. To support their argument of the important role of organizations in politics, the authors use a quote from FDR when he says “get some organized pressure behind you, so that I will be rewarded for doing the right thing..” (108). In truth, Washington made the rich richer and abandoned the middle class because of “the relentless effectiveness of modern, efficient organizations” (115), and due to the increased polarization of the two main political parties. The main thing to learn is that mobilization of corporations pushed politicians to tilt the economy towards the wealthy. …show more content…

The evolution of the republican party occured rather quickly compared to that of the democratic party. Due to the organizational shifts, republicans constructed a party structure that linked interest groups and candidates through bonds of campaign money and favorable public policy. Republicans take advantage of the new political system. The resurgence of republican power was in tandem with rising business power and the beginning of the winner-take-all economy. As American politics shifted, republicans made the fist moves that allowed them to capitalize on the new opportunities while the democrats struggled. This allowed the GOP to raise an incredible amount of money and they were able to invest in a wide range of activities and the democrats couldn’t keep up. To expand on their argument about how the republican party evolved, the authors describe in detail about the characteristics of the republican party in the 1990s under Newt

Show More
Related

  • Analysis of The Party Is Over by Mile Lofgren

    766 Words  | 2 Pages

    In closing, this book informs us on how the Republicans went crazy and Democrats became useless, and how it’s become a problem. The books unfolds the faults of the Republicans and Democrats “behind the scenes”, and made me more aware of the parties today.

    Read More

  • How Did Zinn Agree With The Economic Interests Of The Upper Class

    520 Words  | 2 Pages

    Howard Zinn agrees with the notion that the United States Constitution was created largely with the economic interests of the upper classes. He cites early 20th century historian Charles Beard’s book, “An Economic Interpretation of the Constitution,” to bolster his point that the Constitution was drafted in such a way to predominantly benefit the upper class. In his book, Beard claimed that the wealthy must either control government directly or influence its laws to protect their interests (150). That claim makes sense when looking at the constituency gathered in Philadelphia in 1787; a large majority of the 55 men present were wealthy and owned capital of some sort.

    Read More

  • Citizens United v. FEC: United We Stand, Corporations and All

    1052 Words  | 3 Pages

    During the Gilded Age—a period that began in the 1870s wherein the United States experienced tremendous economic growth—affluent industrialists such as John D. Rockefeller, Andrew W. Mellon, Cornelius Vanderbilt, J.P. Morgan, and Andrew Carnegie exercised, owing in large part to their wealth, enormous influence over the direction of American politics. Though left unaddressed during the Gilded Age, the issue of corporate involvement in political affairs was eventually identified as a corrosive problem in President Theodore Roosevelt’s 1904 State of the Union address. In his address, Roosevelt asserted that corporate spending in federal elections had the potential to engender corruption—or the appear...

    Read More

  • The Inevitable Two-Party System in the U.S.

    1535 Words  | 4 Pages

    The first political parties in America began to form at the end of the 18th century. "The conflict that took shape in the 1790s between the Federalists and the Antifederalists exercised a profound impact on American history." The two primary influences, Thomas Jefferson a...

    Read More

  • Gilded Age Dbq Essay

    1434 Words  | 3 Pages

    The growth of large corporations had impacted American politics by causing governmental corruption because of the power some industries had in society. Since the government had used laissez faire in the late 1800s for the big businesses to...

    Read More

  • Politics of Big Business' During the Rise of the Nazi Party

    389 Words  | 1 Pages

    Parties formed on the behalf of big businesses supporters never found a strong voice in politics. Instead of creating their own political power, businesses could influence politicians with their money. Contributions were made to campaigns of nonsocialist candidates in return for policies that would benefit businesses. Some candidates that were receiving contributions were running against Adolph Hitler (Turner 94).

    Read More

  • The Fall of the Liberal Consensus

    1910 Words  | 4 Pages

    Looking at the United States in 1965, it would seem that the future of the liberal consensus was well entrenched. The anti-war movement was in full swing, civil rights were moving forward, and Johnson's Great Society was working to alleviate the plight of the poor in America. Yet, by 1968 the liberal consensus had fallen apart, which led to the triumph of conservatism with the election of President Reagan in 1980. The question must be posed, how in the course of 15 years did liberal consensus fall apart and conservatism rise to the forefront? What were the decisive factors that caused the fracturing of what seemed to be such a powerful political force? In looking at the period from 1968 to the triumph of Reagan in 1980, America was shaken to the core by the Watergate scandal, the stalling of economic growth, gas shortages, and the Vietnam War. In an era that included the amount of turbulence that the 1970's did, it is not difficult to imagine that conservatism come to power. In this paper I will analyze how the liberal consensus went from one of its high points in 1965 to one of its lows in 1968. From there I will show how conservatism rose to power by the 1980 elections. In doing so, I will look at how factors within the American economy, civil rights issues, and political workings of the United States contributed to the fracturing of the liberal consensus and the rise of conservatism.

    Read More

  • Book Review Of Domhoff's Who Rules America?

    1008 Words  | 3 Pages

    By using the points listed previously, it is evident that a small portion of the population control what policies are implement in America and hold most of the nation’s wealth. I believe this two factors, the wealth one possesses and the amount of control an individual has, are interconnected. America has become a nation where money can get you anyway because it significantly increases the amount of opportunities available to the individual. Many people can attest to the presence of this class, including individuals from Kansas City who participated in a cross-section study with detailed interviews. The citizens of Kansas City referred to these people as “big rich” or “blue bloods” (pg

    Read More

  • Democrats vs. Republicans

    1262 Words  | 3 Pages

    “Republican Party Platforms, Then and Now.” The New York Times. The New York Times Company, 28 Aug. 2012. Web. 18 Mar. 2014.

    Read More

  • The New Right

    1588 Words  | 4 Pages

    Starting during the 1970s, factions of American conservatives slowly came together to form a new and more radical dissenting conservative movement, the New Right. The New Right was just as radical as its liberal opposite, with agendas to increase government involvement beyond the established conservative view of government’s role. Although New Right politicians made admirable advances to dissemble New Deal economic policies, the movement as a whole counters conservativism and the ideologies that America was founded on. Although the New Right adopts conservative economic ideologies, its social agenda weakened the conservative movement by focusing public attention to social and cultural issues that have no place within the established Old Right platform.

    Read More

  • The Conservative Movement

    1550 Words  | 4 Pages

    Story, Ronald and Bruce Laurie. The Rise of Conservatism in America, 1945-2000: A Brief History with Documents. Boston, MA: Bedford/St. Martin's, 2008. Print.

    Read More

  • Pluralism

    1378 Words  | 3 Pages

    The pluralistic scholar David Truman notes that “the proliferation of political interest groups [is] a natural and largely benign consequence of economic development” (Kernell 2000, 429). That is, as American economic development increases, in the form of industry, trade, and technology, factions are produced in order to protect special interests. Factions have a large platform on which to find support from various political parties, committees, subcommittees, and the courts, as well as federal, state, and local governments (Kernell 2000, 429).

    Read More

  • Analysis Of William Domhoff's Who Rules America

    1118 Words  | 3 Pages

    The American upper class controls our governing bodies, our social institutions, our policy-making process, and everything else in between. Ask yourself: when has a poor black woman from inner-city Houston ever navigated the detours and roadblocks that pervade the journey up the American class system? Contrarily, what proportion of American legislators, lobbyists, and lawyers come from upper-middle and upper class families? One element absent from Domhoff’s book was a discussion on social capital. I believe that an acknowledgement of how networking amongst members of the upper class increases the social capital of American elites, and how such a consequence can prove critical in maintaining class parameters and ensuring they remain in place for generations to come. Cutting off communication opportunities between classes is quite possibly the greatest cause of classism in America. It is not that Domhoff neglected a discussion on social capital as his ideas more or less all consummate the idea; I just wish he would have incorporated a discussion of the term directly in his

    Read More

  • The Relationship Between Television and Presidential Elections

    2346 Words  | 5 Pages

    Wattenberg, Martin P. (1986). The decline of American political parties 1952-1984. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

    Read More

  • Political Inequality Essay

    576 Words  | 2 Pages

    Over the past few years, a number of occurrences have displayed the growing economic and political inequality of the United States. The currently dissipated Occupy Movement did draw the general public’s attention to the ridiculous strides made by the rich, whose incomes have skyrocketed within the past four decades. Those pertaining to the middle-income and poor have sadly had their incomes stagnate. According to Caroline Fairchild from the Huffington Post the middle class incomes steadily is on the decline. In 1968 the middle class earned about 53.2 percent of national income in 1968. This number has now fallen to 45.7 percent. Super PACs became a concern as more individual donors willingly wrote up enormous checks to support their particular candidates. As a result, this gave prominence to the growing political inequality, as well as highlighting the rich’s ability to have their words have much more weight over the average citizen in America.

    Read More

More about Why Do Politicians Support The Rich

Open Document