Why Democracy is the Best Form of Government

1173 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: The challenge of democracy chapter one

Introduction

Throughout history different types of instrumental regimes have been in tact so civilizations remained structured and cohesive. As humanity advanced, governments obligingly followed. Although there have been hiccups from the ancient times to modern day, one type of government, democracy, has proven to be the most effective and adaptive. As quoted by Winston Churchill, democracy is the best form of government that has existed. This is true because the heart of democracy is reliant, dependent, and thrives on the populaces desires; which gives them the ability for maintaining the right to choose, over time it adjusts and fixes itself to engulf the prominent troubling issues, and people have the right of electing the person they deem appropriate and can denounce them once they no longer appease them. In this paper, the benefits of democracy are outlined, compared to autocratic communism, and finally the flaws of democracy are illustrated.

Benefits of Democracy

Democracy, specifically Parliamentary styled democracy, is completely dependent on the civilians of a given country. Since the preferred party as a collective is voted in, controversial issues and incessant disagreement is not as huge of a hurdle compared to other democratic styles. Therefore this limits the amount of people who can achieve power. If the head of a party has a concerning façade, the odds of him or her being voted in dwindle. The head of a party represents the party, instead of the party representing him.

In addition, democracy maintains the right of choice. These characteristics are the most appealing and dominate because people can formulate decisions based on their cultural, religious, interpersonal, intrapersonal beliefs that outline who...

... middle of paper ...

...rks Cited

Blais, Andre. "Electoral Insight." CCL Web: Criteria for Assessing Electoral Systems (1999): 1-6. Web. 26 Aug. 2010.

Glazer, Nathan. “Democracy and Deep Divides.” Journal of Democracy Volume 21 (2010): 5-19. Print.

Harowitz, Donald L. “Comparing Democratic Systems” Journal of Democracy, Volume 1 (1990): 73-79. Print.

Janos, Andrew C. “What was Communism: A Retrospective in Comparative Analysis.” Communist and Post- Communist Studies Volume 29 (1996): 1-24. Print.

Linz, Juan. “The Perils of Presidentialism.” Journal of Democracy (1990): 51-69. Print.

Linz, Juan J. “The Virtues of Parliementarism.” Journal of Democracy Volume 1 (1990): 84-91. Print.

Marx, Karl, Engles, Frederick. Manifesto of the Communist Party. Moscow: Progress Publishers, 1848. Print.

Sen, Ronojoy. “The Problem of Corruption.” Journal of Democracy Volume 20 (2009): 89-92. Print.

Show More
Related

  • Communism and Kurt Vonnegut's Harrison Bergeron

    966 Words  | 2 Pages

    2011. The. Lopez, Nate, ed., pp. 113 Communism. The. N. p. n.d. - a.k.a.

    Read More

  • Unemployment in Australia Through a Conflict Perspective.

    1346 Words  | 3 Pages

    Temkin, G. (1998). Karl Marx and the economics of communism: Anniversary recollections. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 31(4), 303–328. doi:10.1016/S0967-067X(98)00014-2

    Read More

  • Communism in the American Education System

    2386 Words  | 5 Pages

    At the time of Marx, communism stiff fell under the category of socialism. During the last twenty-five years of the nineteenth century, there was a split in the Socialist Party, and communism began to be recognized as a movement of its own. The original Communists were small extremist grou...

    Read More

  • Reforming the Canadian Electoral System

    1496 Words  | 3 Pages

    Lavoie, Marie and Vincent Lemieux. “The Evaluation of Electoral Systems", Canadian Parliamentary Review, 14.3 (1984): 2-5. Print

    Read More

  • Democracy in America

    2000 Words  | 4 Pages

    Throughout the course of history, mankind has been recorded to corrupt itself. Men have grown tired of simply surviving; they have had to take and conquer others. Absolute monarchies control wealth, land, and even lives of men. The conditions of the people were solely dependent on the conditions of the one who was in power in that particular place and time. History has proven that most men rule unwisely in their kingdoms. To avoid tyrannical rule, some make an attempt to set up a government in which the people ruled themselves. This form of government is called a democracy, or “rule of the people.” History has also revealed through the Greeks and the French Revolution, that a democracy that gives complete power to the people, “absolute democracy”, is nothing more than a short prelude to tyranny.

    Read More

  • The Prime Minister of Canada

    2331 Words  | 5 Pages

    Larry Johnston (2008) Politics: An Introduction to the Modern Democratic State, Third Edition, Chapters 2, 3, 7, 8 and 9.

    Read More

  • Envision Equality in John Dewey’s Creative Democracy and Jane Mansbridge’s Using Power/Fighting Power

    1168 Words  | 3 Pages

    “Democracy is a personal way of individual life; that it signifies the possession and continual use of certain attitudes, forming personal character and determining desire and purpose in all th...

    Read More

  • Joseph Stalin's Leadership Through World War Two

    1226 Words  | 3 Pages

    1996 Ed. Columbia University Press. "Communism" The Columbia Dictionary of Quotations Ed. Columbia University Press.

    Read More

  • Discussing if liberty and equality can be reconciled in political theory

    1098 Words  | 3 Pages

    Hoffman, J. & Graham, P. (2009), Introduction to Political Theory, 2nd Edition: London: Pearson Education Limited.

    Read More

  • Does Democracy Work?

    849 Words  | 2 Pages

    In comparing the average citizen in a democratic nation, say the United States, to that of a non-democratic nation, for instance Egypt, it will be found that the citizen in the democratic nation is generally better off – free of persecution, free from fear of the authorities, and free to express his opinions on governmental matters. And while national conflicts occur everywhere, incidents like violent revolts have shown to be more prevalent in nations where citizens are not allowed to choose who governs them. It is slightly paradoxical that democracy, so inherently flawed in theory, can lead to such successful outcomes in practice. The question, then, becomes: “If democracy has so many weaknesses, why does it work?”

    Read More

  • DEMOCRACY AND DEVELOPMENT

    2269 Words  | 5 Pages

    There have been enormous efforts to spread democracy as a political system throughout the world by the developed democratic countries and the international development organizations including the World Bank. By the late 1990s the United States alone spent over a half billion dollars to promote democratic expansion throughout the world (Diamond, 2003). These were done considering that the democratic system leads towards development. As a result in the late 20th century we saw a huge political transformation towards democracy. During the last few decades a huge number of countries adopted democracy as their political system. However, it retain a big question how far democracy is successful in bringing development of a country? At this stage, some people also criticizes the effort of democratization arguing that it is done without considering the context of a country, sometimes democracy is not ideal for all countries and it is an effort to extinct diversity of political system. In studying the literature regarding the debate, we found a paradoxical relationship between democracy and development. Some argue that democracy has failed to ensure expected outcomes in terms of development. While others confronted that democracy has a considerable impact on development. Another group of people argue that form of political system actually does not have any impact on development process. On the verge of these debates, some development institutions and academics throw light on why democracy is not working properly, and what measure should be taken to make it more successful in bringing effective development of developing countries. Consequently, this writing is an effort of revisiting the different views about impact of democra...

    Read More

  • Athenian Democracy

    1480 Words  | 3 Pages

    Throughout history, some of the most radical minds have equated democracy to anarchy, arguing a government by the people is no government at all (Jones). There have been a variety of different perceptions and functions of the word democracy over time, yet the word seemingly has only one official meaning. Properly, democracy can be simply defined as a system of government ruled by the people (“democracy, n”). Nevertheless, the numerous perspectives, connotations, and adaptations in regards to democracy’s meaning over time have assisted in transforming the definition of the word into what it’s known as today. To many, democracy is an irreducible concept; however, it continues to be interpreted in an array of methods, ranging from various forms

    Read More

  • Charlie Chaplin's The Great Dictator: Speech Analysis

    1743 Words  | 4 Pages

    While electoral systems do have an impact on the proportionality of electoral outcomes and to a lesser degree on the shape of party systems, it is not realistic to expect a change in electoral system to transform the style of politics in a country. For example, PR-STV was not responsible for the economic boom in Ireland and neither is it responsible for the economic crisis. In their cross-national study of the impact of a number of political reforms, including change to an electoral system, Shaun Bowler and Todd Donovan (The Limits of Electoral Reform, Oxford University Press, 2013) strike a cautionary note, arguing that such reforms tend to have minimal or zero impact. Expecting an electoral change to result in a transformation in the style of politics in a country is completely unrealistic. It is far too easy to blame PR-STV for the happenings in our country, the power is with the people and, therefore, it is down to us to try to create the best possible government that we can. In the words of Martin Luther King Jr. “and so we shall have to decide to do more than register and more than vote; we shall have to create leaders who embody virtues that we can respect, who have moral and ethical principles we can applaud with enthusiasm.” (Martin Luther King, Jr. Quote,

    Read More

  • Democracy Rules!

    794 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...ronment and decisions are made collectively through consultations with various interest groups (not only one person in charge), thus limiting the potential of corruption. A democratic nation has freedom of speech, high human rights, a vibrant civil society and its people are fully involved in decision making.

    Read More

  • Democracy as the Best Form of Government

    1166 Words  | 3 Pages

    The foundation of the modern political system was laid in the times when the world was strangled in slavery. In those moments, enlightened minds in Greek came up with the new system that was there to remain for the next thousands of years. This system, now known as democracy, is a form of government in which supreme power is vested to the people themselves. People have the right to elect their leaders directly or indirectly through a scheme of representation usually involving periodically held free elections. A new democratic government is usually established after every 4-5 years, and it is trusted with the responsibility to cater to the needs of all the people irrespective of the fact that they voted for them or not. Although the minorities may not be very pleased with the idea of democracy, however, a democratic government is certainly the best because it establishes social equality among people, reduces the conflicts in the state to a minimum, gives the chance to vote repeatedly, and creates patriotism.

    Read More

More about Why Democracy is the Best Form of Government

Open Document