Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Mergers and acquisition of banks research paper
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Mergers and acquisition of banks research paper
Explain why banks sometimes seek to merge with with
Explain why banks sometimes seek to merge with with or acquire other
banks or financial institutions.
Great changes have been experiences in banking industry for the past
decades. The most apparent alter is a mass of bank mergers, which have
expanded both the average size of banks and their territories. Other
dramatic changes including the development of Internet banking and the
combination of banking with other financial services, for example,
insurance and securities underwriting are also encountered.
(Number of banks declining despite overall growth in the banking
sector.)
Consolidation in banking is distinct from "convergence."
Consolidation refers to mergers and acquisitions of banks by banks.
Convergence refers to the mixing of banking and other types of
financial services like securities and insurance, through acquisitions
or other means. Consolidation will provide banks with new capabilities
technologies and products, help to overcome entry barriers, ensure
immediate entry into new markets and lower operating costs through
consolidation of resources.
Background on recent consolidation
Large Bank Mergers (Both targets and acquirers have more than one
billion dollars in total assets The Riegle-Neal Act granted interstate
branch banking beginning in 1997.
Since then, the number of large bank mergers has risen dramatically.
sketch this trend along with another remarkable trend,
i.e., that most of the large bank mergers in recent years involved
institutions headquartered in different states; the latter point
advises that these are market-expansion mergers, even though the
acquirer and the target have few overlapping operations in their
respective banking markets. Although the markets they serve are much
bigger, until now none of these three mega banks has achieved the goal
in having a banking franchise that spans all 50 states, which is
feasible in law.
Another noticeable fact about the recently announced mega mergers is
that the target banking companies are positive institutions that are
likely to survive as independent organizations. This is in stark
contrast both to the late 1980s and early 1990s in the U.S., when many
bank mergers involved relatively feeble banking companies being
acquired by somewhat stronger organizations, as well as to s...
... middle of paper ...
...rgers of Publicly Traded
Banking Organizations Revisited." Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta
Economic Review 84(4), pp. 26-37.
Kwan, S.H., and E. Laderman. 1999. "On the Portfolio Effects of
Financial Convergence: A Review of the Literature." FRBSF Economic
Review 2, pp. 18-31
Stiroh, K J and J P Poole (2000): i2Explaining the rising
concentration of banking assets in the 1990slt, Current issues in
economics and finance, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, vol 6, no 9,
August,pp 1-6.
Santomero, A 'Bank Mergers: What's a Policy Maker to do?, Journal of
Banking and Finance, 1999.
Dermine, J.'Banks Mergers in Europe: Public Policy Issues', Journal of
Common Market Studies, September, 2000.
Berger, A. et al. 'Consolidation of the Financial Services
Industry: Causes, Consequences and Implications', Journal of Banking
and Finance, December 1991
Akhavein, J.D., A.N. Berger, and D.B. Humphrey. 1997. "The Effects of
Megamergers on Efficiency and Prices: Evidence from a Bank Profit
Function." Review of Industrial Organization 12, pp. 95-139.
.Rhoades, S.A. 2000. "Bank Mergers and Banking Structure in the United
States, 1980-98." Federal Reserve Staff Study 174.
Flaherty, Edward. 1997. A Brief History of Banking in the United States <http://odur.let.rug.nl/~usa/E/usbank/bank03.htm> (accessed 12-12-99)
Weisberger, Bernard A. “The Bank War: History of First U.S. Government Bank.” American Heritage. July-Aug. 1997: 10-12. General OneFile. Web. 12 Apr. 2011.
Gaughan, P. A., 2002. Mergers, Acquisitions, and Corporate restructuring. 3rd ed.New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Before granting merger forms The Bureau of Competition was committed to ensuring that involved companies do not create a monopoly in the market and hence reduce competition that may also affect the integrity of the services provided. In most cases the bureau controlling the start and the running of mergers uses the Hart-Scott-Rodino amendments to the Clayton Act (Clark, 2011). Before becoming a part of the merger it is important that FTC does an analysis of the merger to evaluate the effects the merger may have on the businesses. In addition, it is important that FTC gets to have a clear picture of the situation and how it is expected to affect the relations...
Negative Results. The negative outcomes of consolidation are often seen in the financial and public relations aspect of consolidating. One of the most prominent and controversial as...
Investment Banks and Commercial Banks Are Analogous to Oil and Water: They Just Do Not Mix
There are many economic principles that impact credit unions’ ability to compete in the financial services industry. The focus of this paper will be on the market in which credit unions operate, the impact this market has on the credit unions’ ability to differentiate their products and or services in terms of pricing or features, and the barriers credit unions face in their market that impact a credit union’s ability to grow and remain profitable in their market. The Market Structure Market structure is classified according to the degree of competition firms encounter in their industry (Baker College, 2016). There are four main market structures: pure competition, monopolistic competition, oligopoly and a pure monopoly. Pure competition is where firms encounter the highest degree of competition.
One of the major unintended impacts of the Dodd-Frank Act has been on credit unions and community banks. These banks weathered the credit crisis and lost only 6% of their share of banking assets between 2006 and mid-2010. A recent Harvard study indicates that this decline accelerated to 12% since the passage of the Dodd-Frank in July 2010. [a] While the community banks’ earnings increased by 12% to $5.3 billion by mid 2015 the number of these banks had declined according to Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. The number of banks with assets under $1 billion has declined from around 7500 in 2010 to less than 6000 since Dodd-Frank came into effect. [b] Increased compliance costs due hiring of new personnel to interpret the new regulations compelled these banks to cut down on customer service amongst other things. The law hurt them disproportionately and forced them to consolidate. Regulatory economies of scale drive the process of consolidation. A larger bank is often more equipped at handling increased regulatory burdens
Toronto-Dominion Bank, CIBC agreed to merge with the Canadian government in 1998. However, on the recommendation of then Paul Martin, Minister of Finance, blocking the merger - as well as another by Bank of Montreal and Royal Bank of Canada - as not in the interest of Canadians.
The early decades of the nineteenth century saw the establishment of banks in the Caribbean largely as a convenience for the local governments. Throughout much of the nineteenth century, most Caribbean banks operated as an oligopoly with limited government influence – this directly translated into higher profits. However, over time, the banking environment could best be described as complex and dynamic. Competition increased, resulting into greater need for improved customer service, product innovation and cost reduction strategies. In order to achieve this, the banking sector was undergoing major structural reforms characterized by mergers and acquisitions. On July 23, 2001 Barclays and CIBC announced that they were in advanced discussions which were intended to lead to the combination of their retail, corporate and offshore banking operations in the Caribbean.
There are financial risks of merging with or acquiring an organization, this is why you must have a strategic plan in place in order to benefit. Companies merge with other companies for one main reason: to make money. A vertical merger happens when a company moves up or down its own product line. The sensible reason for merging with or acquiring a company is that it makes financial sense. In November 2004 Sears and Kmart said that they were going to be merging together; this combination would become the largest retail merger that there is.
Ritter, Lawrence R., Silber, William L., Udell, Gregory F. 2000, Money, banking, and Financial Markets, 10th edn, USA.
Never have I ever climbed a mountain peak. As a child, I imagined myself conducting expeditions in deep-frozen pathways, leading amateur explorers to the top of the world, and instructing rookies in surviving harsh blizzards. Even though slightly altered, my childhood dream has been achieved. I led a team of fellow classmates, in my Strategic Management course, to the success summit of a financial competition. Over the course of a semester, I and my teammates were supposed to create and manage a company of the IT industry, in a computer-simulated environment, along with other four rival teams. I dealt with strategy and financial matters of our virtual enterprise, while my colleagues were working on marketing and manufacturing. During the four months of the exercise, I have experienced finance from various aspects: capital budgeting, through selecting favorable investment for upcoming quarters; debt management, by assessing the necessary amount and efficiency of loans; profitability analysis and dividend policy, which had been used to compile the company’s general performance index. Working in a multinational team, which included an American, a Norwegian and a Moldovan, strengthen my negotiations skills, as well as flexibility and cooperation. But above all, this experience intensified my passion for finance. Of course, a pleasant bonus was the fact that, in the end, our company’s financial performance was six times the performance of second-best team.
A variety of groups are concerned in bank profitability for various reasons. The bank shareholders would want to know if the value of their investments is high or low. The investors also use current and past performance to predict future price of the banks’ shares traded on the stock exchanged. The management of the bank as trustee of the shareholders is evaluated and compensated on the basis of how well their decisions and planning have contributed to growth in assets and profits of their banks. Employees of bank also are concerned with profits, since their salaries and promotions are frequently tied to the profitability performance of their banks. Depositors use bank performance and profitability as indicators of security for their deposits in the banks. Finally, business community and general public are concerned about their banks’ performance to the extent that their economic prosperity is linked to the success or failure of their banks.
This is followed in section 5 by an analysis of the recent changes in the banking industry. With the development of the financial system, declining entry barriers and the deregulation of the banking industry make banks no longer the monopoly suppliers of banking services and reduce their comparative advantages which they usually hold in the past. Whether the reasons give rise to the existence of banks are still powerful will be examined here, while section 6 offers a way of considering whether banks are declining by looking at the value added by the banks. When the value added by banks is examined, banks are not a financial intermediation, which not only conduct the traditional services but also provide more diversified