More handpicked essays just for you.
Lord of the flies main character development
Survival for the fittest in lord of the flies
The characterisation of the novel lord of the flies
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Lord of the flies main character development
Physical survival
Picture that you are a little child no more than the age of 12 and no younger than the age of 6. You live in the time of World War 2 and your plane gets hit and crashes into an uninhabited island with no adults anywhere. In the novel Lord of the Flies, by William Golding some boys get stuck in the same situation. Throughout the novel boy at the ages of six through twelve get stuck on an island and the have to decide how to manage things without adults when their physical survival is at stake. According to evidence in the story, when a man’s main priority is physical survival he loses his sense of practicality and humanity. The initial quality people lose when their main priority is survival is practicality. During the big fire at Castle Rock, the boys are dancing and acting out their hunting chant around the fire when, “ The beast (Simon) struggled forward, broke the ring, and fell over the steep edge of the rock to the sand by the water. At once the crowd surged after it, poured down the rock, lept onto the beast, screamed, struck, bit, tore. There were no words, and no movements but the tearing of the
…show more content…
Although, to most of the kids the idea of catching and killing a pig is fun and games, they do not realize how dangerous it could be playing around pretending to kill a pig with a real person; especially when the person acting it out is a little kid. While on the island it is proven that when they think of their survival they lose one of their greatest traits, humanity. This is proven when they went hunting with Jack, “Roger ran around the heap, prodding with his spear whenever pig flesh appeared. Jack was on top of the sow, stabbing downward with his knife”(135). When the hunters caught the pig they repeatedly stabbed it over and over instead of killing it right away or giving up when it ran away. They also chose to kill the sow when it had piglets with it over many other pigs around
The early pig hunt “has been relatively innocent,” (Johnston 12-13) yet to reveal the deeper meanings. Johnston suggests that the existence of pigs leads the boys into hunting in order to satisfy hunger. On the other hand, it highlights and reveals the true danger that lies inside each individual, and to Jack, this loss of innocence only pulls him into evilness more profoundly. Soon after his second attempt in hunting, which turns out to be a success, chantings of "Kill the pig. Cut her throat. Spill her blood." (Golding 96) become popular among the boys. Since the idea of hunting pigs and eating meat appear attractive to the boys, they begin to admire Jack's new skill as suppose to judging for his aggressive behaviors. Merridew, however, fails to recognize that his actions come at the cost of an emerging savagery-like affiliation. At the same time, his original identity as a choirboy with “voices [like]... the song of angels” (Golding 191) slowly subsides from his character. Compared to hunting, the angelic voice does not increase the chances of survival, thus its significance becomes subordinate to that of hunting. From the first encounter with the pig to the complete loss of innocence, adult figures are also responsible for his unsubtle
Like Jack, the boys no longer value kindness, compassion, or empathy, Instead, they resort to violence and force. This is shown when the boys do their dance and chant “kill the beast! Cut his throat! Spill his blood!” (Golding 168) This chant is one of violence and savagery. When the boys see Simon crawling out of the jungle, they don’t care if it’s a human or a beast, their first instinct is just to kill. Another example of the boy’s lack of compassion and empathy, is when they participate in tying up Wilfred and allow Jack to beat him for no apparent reason. Jack’s tribe continues to slip further into savagery. They rebel against, and destroy everything that represents kindness, order and civilization. This is evident when Jack, Roger, and Maurice go to Ralph’s camp, taunt Piggy, steal his glasses to make a fire, and beat up the civilized group. Piggy’s death and the breaking of the conch also represent the group’s disintegration of humanity. Piggy says while holding the conch: “Which is better-to be a pack of painted niggers like you are, or be sensible like Ralph is?” (Golding 200) The tribe chooses savagery over order when Roger releases the boulder that kills Piggy, and shatters the conch. The evolution of savagery is complete when the group’s morals and values become the laws in which they abide
They thought their society was stable; they thought it would last. It all started with the conch shell that gathered them. In the book The Lord of the Flies by William Golding, a group of boys became nomads on an island causing them to take on the biggest challenge of their lives, survival. The traits for a successful survivalist would include cooperation, maturity and responsibility. But if they can’t achieve those traits they will crash, causing chaos on the island.
Circumstance and time can alter or determine the different paths a group of young boys will take. These paths can have the power to strip children of their own innocence. Such a statement can be explored in William Golding’s “Lord of the Flies” as it ventures into the pros and cons of human nature. William Golding’s tale begins with a group of English school boys who crash land on a deserted tropical island during World War II. In Lord of the Flies, the island that the boys crash on is beautiful, glamorous, and magnificent; yet, it proves to become a dystopia by the horror of the cruelty, violence, and inhumanity.
The novel Lord of the Flies was full of challenges that the boys overcame in order to survive. Conflicts within themselves, with nature and with each other constantly test the children’s ability to endure. Struggles against the natural elements of the island, rival groups or fear of the unknown continually appear throughout the story. Some of the boys on the island did not survive the quarrels that they faced. They perished because they were lacking something that the surviving boys did not. The survivors had a natural primal instinct or a physical or mental advantage over the boys who did not make it. ‘Only the strong survive’ is an important element that runs through the novel Lord of the Flies because in order to survive the boys must turn to their primitive instincts of physical strength and savagery.
A part of human nature is inherently chaotic and “barbaric.” These natural impulses, however, are generally balanced by the human desire for leadership and structure. In Lord of the Flies, William Golding discusses what may happen in a scenario in which there is a lack of societal structure and constraints. Golding wants the reader to understand that humans have an innate desire to be primitive- describing it as “mankind 's essential illness”- that is usually suppressed by an equal desire for order. Under extreme circumstances, humans may revert back to their most basic impulses that they usually keep suppressed due to social norms. Throughout the book, the boys’ primitive behavior is heightened by their lack of a leader and, eventually, their
Have you ever endured the fear of a plane crash, and the body shaking nerves that follow when you find out you have been stranded on an island with no way of knowing where you are, or when you will get rescued? In William Golding’s book, The Lord of the Flies, a group of young boys being evacuated from England during World War II, become stranded on an island after their plane crashes, killing the pilot of the plane- who happens to be the only adult on board. The boys must endure creating a society of their own, face their greatest fears, and struggle for power and authority over the others as they discover their true human nature. Because of the boys altering their behavior to survive living on the island, permanent changes made to their behavior
One of the reasons the boys are not in any way a life or death situation is the fact that they have no urgency to make a good, solid shelter. The weather on the island is ideal temperature for sleeping outside. This causes the boys to get into frequent arguments about their priorities. Ralph says,
In Lord of the Flies the boys start off as civilized humans but the longer the boys remain on the island the more they lose their humanity and turn into savages. At the beginning of the novel the boys are making plans on how they will survive and cooperate on the island, “We can help them to find us. If a ship comes near the island they may not notice us. So we must make a fire” (Golding 33). At that point in the novel the boys are hoping that they will get rescued so they perform tasks such as making a fire on top of a mountain, so if anyone passes the island they know that they are there. Yet, as the story comes to an end and a ship comes to rescue the boys they cry, “Simon was dead-and Jack had...The tears began to flow and sobs shook him-and infected by that emotion, the other little boys began to shake and sob too” (Golding 186). At this point in the novel Simon and Piggy had been murdered due to the savage behavior of the boys, and when the person comes to rescue the boys that is when Ralph realizes the gravity of the evils they had committed on the island and
“The survival of the fittest”, a theory brought forth by Charles Darwin representing that the weak will suffer and only the strong may survive. A theory that is heavily related with cruelty. Such cruelty occurred in the book Lord of the Flies where a group of children become stranded on an island after their plane crash. The book slowly splits into two paths, one leading to salvation and rescue while the second leads to the abandoning civilization and only desiring to survive for themselves. Jack, the main antagonist in Lord of the Flies, demonstrates the cruelty of the second path as he slowly corrodes the group into degenerates at his attempt to usurp power.
The book Lord of the Flies by William Golding is an exhilarating novel that is full of courage, bravery, and manhood. It is a book that constantly displays the clash between two platoons of savage juveniles mostly between Jack and Ralph who are the main characters of the book. The Kids become stranded on an island with no adults for miles. The youngsters bring their past knowledge from the civilized world to the Island and create a set of rules along with assigned jobs like building shelters or gathering more wood for the fire. As time went on and days past some of the kids including Jack started to veer off the rules path and begin doing there own thing. The transformation of Jack from temperately rebellious to exceptionally
Jack and his hunting boys went off to try and kill a pig, and successfully did so. As Roger violently killed the pig, the blood poured all over Jack’s hands. Jack then “giggled and flicked them while the boys laughed at his reeking palms” (Golding 195). Jack enjoyed playing in the blood of the pig that he and the boys slayed. This shows how quickly Jack changed from a young, polite boy to a violent and sadistic savage. After Robert was used as a pig in the boys’ game of hunting, the boys thought that the game was extremely enjoyable and that they would do it again. After Robert was seriously injured, he says to the boys, “‘You want a real pig because you’ve got to kill him.’ ‘Use a littlun,’ said Jack, and everybody laughed” (Golding 165). In other words, Jack suggests that they should literally kill a littlun so that the boys can reenact what happened when they killed a pig. Before, Jack could not bring himself to even kill a pig. But after staying on the island, he was able to not only kill a pig, but he also even suggested on killing an innocent child for
“Civilization begins with order, grows with liberty, and dies with chaos” -Will Durant. Every human has a basic instinct of survival lying within them. This instinct to survive can be tested when one is placed in a state of prolonged anguish and panic. In the right environment, this instinct to survive can turn any civilized being into a beastly savage. William Golding’s novel, Lord of the Flies explores this idea of a civilized human’s ability to become a savage, when put in the right circumstance. In the beginning of the book, Golding’s main protagonists, Ralph, Piggy and Jack are symbols of civilization, order and hope. Once they are stranded on a desert island and left to their own devices, fear, the pursuit of power and human corruption turns the three boys into savages. Golding’s novel clearly depicts how without the structure of civilization, it is human nature for a person to revert back to its innate savagery.
Their feelings overcame them and they forgot the real reason as to why they were killing the pig in the first place. The whole situation they were put in was turned into a game for them. So they lost the whole point of killing it and I think it was because they were distressed or something.For starters, they all teamed up and caught a female pig that just gave birth and not just killed it, they brutally murdered it in a way that wasn't exactly normal for what I had assumed they were capable of. Not only did they just kill that one pig, but because that pig just gave birth, the new pigs wouldn't have a food supply to live off of because the mother pig would have provided the milk for the piglets. So doing so, this cut the meat supply for the boys on the island. Of course, as young boys, this wasn't their first thought. Their thought was that they got lucky that the pig just gave birth because that would mean the pig would be a lot slower, which is in fact, an easier catch. If I were in that situation, I would've waited till the piglets grew up a little bit more to where they didn't need to rely on their mother any more, then from there I would kill the mother pig and wait for the babies to reproduce new piglets before killing them. They didn't just kill the pig, but they had also tore it to pieces and took it way out of hand, it is assumed that they have raped the pig and put the head of the pig on stick. This was a very grousing part of the story to read because right then, they weren't just hunters, they were psycho murderers. All in all with that situation, I believe that the boys could have handled it another
Up to this point in the novel, the boys mistook Simon as the beast and killed him without a second thought while they were chanting. This is Golding’s method of describing how savage the kids have become due to their loss of civilization. His use of diction, characterizes the boys and shows the contrast of who they were, to who they’ve become. Eventually, the boys reach the pinnacle of chaos and the complete and utter loss of civilization when Piggy’s death occurs. Piggy’s death not only presents chaos, but the destruction of the conch and its symbol for civilization represents the loss of civilized british boys on the island as shown in this quote. “… Roger, with a sense of delirious abandonment, leaned all his weight on the lever… The rock struck Piggy a glancing blow from chin to knee; the conch exploded into a thousand white fragments and ceased to exist” (200). At this moment, Roger had deliberately activated the lever which made a large rock tumble over the cliff and smash Piggy. This not only killed Piggy, but the conch exploded too. Golding described Roger’s emotion as being delirious while he was knowingly about to kill Piggy since it was an attempt to display the chaos that is inside the boys.