What Is The Elements Of Symbolism In 'An Outpost Of Progress'?

1659 Words4 Pages

“An Outpost of Progress” evinces numerous stylistic elements for the invocation of an atmosphere of the mysteriousness, obscureness and sorrow, outlining the essence of Gothic stories. First, the reader experiences the overwhelming power of the symbolism of graves and crosses, as it encircles the story, being represented at the beginning and at the end of it. After illustrating rather monotonously the surroundings of the trading post, including the edifices where Makola and the two white men live, the narrator reveals the existence of “another dwelling place some distance away from the buildings” (Conrad Part I). Further, the narrator explains, “In it, under a tall cross much out of the perpendicular, slept the man who had seen the beginning …show more content…

Bensemmane; Conrad Part I). Evidence is given with the illustration of the enormous forest, which “hide[s] fateful complications of fantastic life, [and] lay[s] in the eloquent silence of greatness” (Conrad Part I). By means of this depiction, the narrator refers to the magnificence of Africa’s nature that Kayerts and Carlier are unable to see. Due to their lack of knowledge about this foreign and distant country, both are biased, ensuing in the inability to “[understand] nothing [and to care] for nothing” (Conrad Part I). Besides, towards the end of the story, the narrator evokes presumably the most striking creation of this claustrophobic feeling by using the symbolism of the mist for obscuring and darkening the scenery. Having shot Carlier to death, Kayerts feels himself in a hopeless plight and fears the consequences of his action. The narrator, therefore, employs the fog pattern to underscore his desperation and fear, …show more content…

By the usage of this particular vocabulary, the narrator reinforces Kayerts’ feeling of being confined and entrapped in this mist. Further, it clearly transfers not only Kayerts but also the reader out of everyday life experiences, emphasising the inability of explaining this peculiar event. Referring to Burke’s concept of the sublime, the narrator indeed dramatizes here the idea of pain and danger as encountering the mighty and powerful as well as the “deadly immaculate” (cf. Burke 13-14; Conrad Part II). Through the personification of the mist, this description changes into an imagination beyond reason, since a fog is, in fact, not able the ‘penetrate’ the character. Moreover, the reduced visibility, which Kayerts experiences, alludes anew to colonial criticism, meaning the Western exploitation of foreign countries. As Kayerts and Carlier reveal, while recording a print they have found in their home, that the Western judge the “Colonial Expansion” in a highly positive way. The narrator epitomises, “It spoke much of the rights and duties of civilization, of the sacredness of the civilizing work, and extolled the merits of those who went about bringing light, and faith and commerce to the dark places of the earth” (Conrad Part I). By means of the usage of ‘brining light’, the narrator ironically indicates the process of enlightening the uncivilised

Open Document