What Is The Differences Between Ernest Hemingway And Good People

1016 Words3 Pages

Love is one of the most diverse and unexplainable emotions felt by humans. The success of a relationship depends on the capacity to truly love and care for another person outside of ourselves. Two stories by different authors bring up love and how it affects a relationship in a difficult situation. David Foster Wallace’s “Good People” and Ernest Hemingway’s “Hills like White Elephants” both show the diversity of love within a relationship. Wallace does a great job portraying Lane’s internal battle to an honest love with Sheri, while Hemingway depicts a false love expressed between the American and Jig. The differences between the love and closeness in the two relationships is made apparent by the use of literary tools. Both stories utilize …show more content…

Wallace uses first person point of view in “Good People”. The use of this point of view shows readers the depth of the relationship between Lane and Sheri. We are able to get a closer look into the thoughts and feelings of Lane, and how he feels about his love for Sheri, or lack thereof. Wallace presents Lane in a state of internal turmoil. Lane Dean Jr. battles his feelings, truly believing he “might not even know his own heart or be able to read and know himself” (152). The first person point of view allows readers to follow Lane’s journey to the realization of his love for Sheri. The diversity of love is unexplainable and Lane begins to realize the variety in love as he questions “why he is so sure he doesn’t love her,” and “why is one kind of love any different” (155)? It is easy for readers to empathize with Lane’s doubt of love for Sheri because of Wallace’s decision to write …show more content…

Without the close insight to the American’s true feelings and thoughts, the disconnect between the American and Jig is more prominent. Hemingway utilizes the word “look” at an attempt to bring readers into the true feelings of the characters, but each “look” is seemingly meaningless without the words and thoughts meant behind it. The American’s words are the only insight to his feelings on the situation him and Jig are in. He truly seems to believe an abortion is no big deal when he declares “it’s really an awfully simple operation Jig, it’s not really an operation at all…I wouldn’t have you do it if you didn’t want to. But I know it’s perfectly simple” (116). His outward total lack of concern for Jig in regards to the operation further shows how much a difference in point of views changes how readers’ interpretation of love exists between two very similar

Open Document