What Is Orwell's Attitude Towards Women In 1984

501 Words2 Pages

In this article, Blu Tirohl is concerned with the description of sexuality as a weapon of revolt in 1984. She aimed to show Orwell’s vision of sexual relationships under totalitarian regimes and related it to both his principles about women and his personal life experiences. The author started his analysis by a study of the psychological and literary domination that the party uses to control sexuality in 1984. She defined the process of ‘doublethink’ and stated the party’s measures to eliminate all types of personal privacy in people’s lives as well as all types of sentimental pleasures including parental one. Next, the author examined Julia’s and Winston’s motives to develop their relationship. The last part of the article was devoted to Orwell’s life since childhood in an attempt to relate this to his attitudes towards women. The author considers the relationship between Julia and Winston as an act of rebellion and to support his argument he treated both character’s motives separately. She introduced Julia’s seductive character as an example of personal rebellion for personal pleasure and considered her as a threat for the party, because she is able to seduce other …show more content…

She claimed that Orwell did not attribute much importance to the sexual issue in 1984, which is not true in my opinion. Sexual relationships were at the heart of Orwell’s critique to totalitarian regimes. Moreover, Blu criticized Julia’s refusal to have sex with Winston because of her menstruation as an incoherent argument. She considers the act of enjoying sex during the menstruation as ‘the ultimate weapon in this type of silent rebellion.’ Then, the author wondered if Orwell mentioned menstruation as a taboo. I don’t agree with Blu about this interpretation because there is no elements in her interpretation which evoke menstruation as a

Open Document