Watershed Years

861 Words2 Pages

Title

By definition, watershed years are years of change or revolution. However, under the examination of history one watershed year truly stands out as “the watershed year”. It was 1968; the United States began an operation known as the Tet Offensive, January 31, 1968 that marked the pinnacle of US involvement in Vietnam (as military advisors in 1950, and the deployment of combat units in 1965). This year also marked the assassinations of two high-profile public figures, Martin Luther King Jr. (April 4, 1968) and Robert Kennedy (June 5, 1968). President Lyndon B. Johnson announced that he would not seek a second term in office as the President of the United States, which spurred a democratic convention in Chicago from August 26 to August 29, 1968. On August 28 a “police riot” took place in Grant Park after the police busted through a crowd to beat down a young man who lowered the American Flag resulting in the police having objects thrown at them from the crowd in his defense. In retaliation, the police began using large amounts of mace in order to control the wild mob of war protestors. Finally, the election of President Richard Nixon occurred on November 5, 1968 who won the election over the democratic nominee Hubert Humphrey.

The major factor that led to the true end of the Cold War was the ongoing personal and diplomatic relationship between Presidents George H. Bush and Mikhail Gorbachev. This resulted in the reduction of the Russian military and favorable arms agreements. Key indicators of the substance behind this relationship were the Soviet troop withdrawals from Czechoslovakia, Afghanistan, and Hungary (lifting the Hungarian/Austrian “Iron Curtain” along the border). Subsequently the opening of the Berl...

... middle of paper ...

... of Florida, under the Electoral College, electoral votes for the candidate running for office receive a plurality of their popular vote. Therefore, whoever gets the majority of the national electoral votes wins the election. Bush won by a narrow margin of these votes resulting in a mandatory machine recount, which afterwards concluded that Bush’s victory margin, was even narrower. This allowed Al Gore to request a recount in the counties of his choice, so naturally he chose the counties whose votes were historically democratic. The uncertainty continued through the circuit courts all the way to The Florida Supreme Court who ruled in Bush v. Gore that there was not enough time to recount the popular vote ballots without violating the United States constitution. The recounting of the ballots would have violated the Fourteenth Amendments “Equal Protection Clause”.

Open Document