Hammurabi’s code fair or unfair. Hammurabi’s code is a set of laws. Hammurabi was the leader of Babylon; he ruled for 42 years 40 centuries ago. Hammurabi ruled one million people. Hammurabi’s code was it just? In this question key terms to it is code and just. Code means a set of laws, and just means fair. In paragraph one it will state that Hammurabi’s code was unjust because of its harsh punishments. In paragraph 2 it will state that Hammurabi’s code was unjust because of its non-equality to people. In paragraph 3 it will state that Hammurabi’s code was unjust because of its unfair reasoning of having that law.
Hammurabi’s code was unjust because of its harsh punishments. In document (A) it shows that Shamash a god gave Hammurabi the set of laws so we don’t know if Shamash hated Babylon, and wanted to see everybody die. So Shamash might of made the laws have harsh punishments. In document (D) Law 23 and 48 have harsh punishments. Law 23 states that a mayor and the city have to repay of what he has lost. That is unfair because that mayor and city shouldn’t have to lose product because someone got robbed. In Law 48 it states that if a man borrows money to plant his crops and his crops are flooded by a storm the creditor
…show more content…
In document (C) there are 2 laws that should not be laws due to the unfair reason of this law. Law 129 states that if a married lady is caught [in adultery] with another man, they shall bind them and cast them into the water. That shouldn’t be a law because one woman in Babylon are sold in auctions so they might not like their husband. Also the man they are caught with might not know she is married, that is why that law has an unfair reason. Law 195 states that if a son strikes his father, his hands shall be caught off. This is an unfair reason because hitting your father is not a big enough deal to be a law. These laws are unfair because they have unfair reasons to
Ancient laws were brutal. Babylonian laws, like Hammurabi's Code, included physical torture and death as punishments. The rule behind these punishments was "an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth."Hammurabi was the name of the king in the city-state of Babylon who ruled for nearly 4,000 years ago.This code was a set of 282 laws that maintained order. Hammurabi's Code was unjust because accidents were punished, punishments for intentional damage was extreme, and it focused on revenge instead of preventing future crime.
Is Hammurabi’s Code just or unjust? Hammurabi ruled for 42 years. By his 38th year, he already had 282 laws. He ruled over most of Mesopotamia. He became king of a small city-state called Babylon. He wasn’t the first king to write in cuneiform for his laws.
Hammurabi’s code was based on the saying ‘an eye for an eye’. This means that the retribution for the crime would roughly fit the severity of the crime. For example, if someone poked someone’s eye out, someone would poke that someone’s eye out. I think this is fair because it doesn’t make sense any other way. For instance, if one was jailed ten years for a minor theft (a purse, a bike, etc.) and someone else was jailed ten years for a major theft (robbing the bank, stealing a valuable painting, etc.), that wouldn’t be reasonable. In Hammurabi’s ‘an eye for an eye’ theory, all the punishments are equal to the crime, which is very practical. Most of his laws are based on this.
Does he have mercy,she cheated on my husband so they tied up and through in the river. Hammurabi,he was a ruler. He wrote a 292 laws down on stone and was going to make life fair, These laws was harsh, but I believe they were fair. We will be disgusting if Hammurabi's code was Just or unjust. in other words fair,Was Hammurabi’s code FAIR? Was Hammurabi’s laws fair or unfair to the people.I believe that Hammurabi’s code was JUST. In this essay I will be discussing my reasons why I think Hammurabi’s code was just.
For example of a law that is not-just is “If a surgeon has operated with a bronze lancet on a free man for a serious injury, and has caused his death,..... his hands should be cut off. (Doc E). This law is unjust because nobody in this world if perfect and they shall not have their hands cut off for making a mistake. An example of a just law is “If a son struck a father, his hands shall be cut off.” This law is fair because it is teaching people to not strike their father. However three examples presented above of the laws are: Family laws, Property laws, and Personal-Injury law. Hammurabi’s code was just in so many
The Code of Hammurabi has a slightly different way of describing the way a society should maintain stability and avoid chaos. In this code of conduct it is more on the lines of something similar to the Bill of Rights where each idea is stated in form of a law. For example, in the 15th amendment of The Code it staes “15: If any one take a male or female slave of the court, or a male or female slave of a freed man, outside the city gates [to escape], he shall be put to death.” It is a listed set of laws followed by a consequence whether it is minor or as harsh as the death penalty. If such harsh punishments were informed, I believe the law makers or theorists saw it as a type of scare which would prevent people from committing the crime. There are those people who do break the law and make stupid decisions, but it would keep the amount of people making stupid decisions and breaking the law to a
Hammurabi’s Code provides evidence for early documents that signify law and order. For instance, Hammurabi’s says in his code if a man wrongs another with his false accusations, he shall be subjected to death (1, 3). His laws illustrate a judicial system in which someone has to pay someone that they wronged in either the same way that they wronged him or through money depending on the person’s social status. It is also said in his code of law that there were penalties for those who disobeyed his laws. For example, Hammurabi says, “If that man do not pay attention to my words…may the great god, the father of the gods, ...
Hammurabi is best known for his succession in writing down the first complete set of laws, titled Hammurabi’s Code. He strived as a king to bring protection, fairness, and justice to the weak of society using laws from the God of justice, Shamash. Hammurabi’s Code was written on a large stone pillar called a stele. In addition to writing a set of 282 laws, he expanded the territory of Babylon northward and westward, encouraged agriculture, and oversaw the erection of many buildings and temples. One may argue that since Hammurabi changed and eliminated some of the laws before he published the complete set, he was changed by the times. However, revising some of the laws was necessary to ensure the best protection and fairness for the people. Overall, King Hammurabi laid the foundation for the laws that we have today and his legacy continues on in our justice
The formers of the Hammurabi’s Code of Laws surely created strict rules with severe punishments for their violation. In fact, these laws played a big role in organization of Mesopotamian society. Reading these laws, reader may learn about ideals people of Mesopotamia had about crimes, their attitude to the lower and higher social classes, and legal rights between men and women. Reading the laws I noticed that many crimes were punished by death penalty. Many laws tell that guilty person has to pay the same price for the physical harm one did to another person or one’s relative. For instance: law 196 states (encyclopedia.com): “ If a man put out the eye of another man, his eye shall be put out.” In addition, at that time, people were penalized to death for many crimes or wrongdoings that almost never would be penalized with capital punishment at a modern time. Among such felony and misdemeanors are stealing, robbery, accusation, adultery, and desertion. Hammurabi’s Code also, reveals inequality between social classes. Slaves were not treated by the laws the same as free-born people. According to the Code of Hammurabi, women had some legal rights, but these rights were not equal to men’s. Married women had a right to divorce as well as men. In fact, in order to acquire the right for divorce, a woman has to find a reasonable explanation for her desire, and only than the divorce could be possible.
The form of the Code of Hammurabi is significant in the way that it is written. The simple language used to write the Code allowed the average member of Babylonian society to understand the expectations placed on them. Each of 282 laws was written separately with specific examples of indiscretions that were illegal, and the precise form of punishment that would occur. The Code also sets guidelines for the fees that were paid to doctors, veterinarians, shipbuilders, ferryboat operators, and to the owners of rented livestock.
One of the most important aspects of any society is the ruling system. A society simply could not function without any sort of rules or regulations. With the tremendous growth of Babylonian society came the need for law systems. Perhaps one of the most well known law systems was Babylonian ruler Hammurabi’s compilation of Mesopotamian laws known as Hammurabi 's Code. Hammurabi 's Code contained laws pertaining to trade, marriage, property, crime, social class, and more (Judge and Langdon, 25). So much can be learned about early societies through this famous artifact. Although these laws may have been accepted by the Babylonian citizens at the time, it is now clear to see that the code was extremely unjust. Hammurabi 's Code uncovers the social
In Babylon the law was harsher and stricter these laws where very dark but it gave us the idea of a justice system but their punishment wasn’t something to be desired usually the people found guilty were sentenced to the removal of a tongue, breast, hands, eye, or ear (history.com). as to the code of Assura there laws where mostly against women though men could be tried but untimely it was a man’s word over a women and the man’s word was more believable than a woman but here in these set a laws it states the consequences of cheating on your husband or sleeping with another
The Hammurabi Code and Mosaic Law were used to lead their people during two different era. They were similarities and differences, between the two. For example, they were both discovered by their leaders in similar ways, but differed in their approach to justice and morality. Hammurabi Code respects women, but has distinct social class and penalties based on the class you belonged to, while the Mosaic Law had no distinction between people and gave everybody even fairness.
After the Commercial Law came the Penal Law. This had to do with the issue of crime. The laws were unusually harsh do to their ineducation. Despite this the wealthy class usually enjoyed more freedom from the law than the lower classes. There was no jury in the court back in the times of Babylon. The code of Hammurabi was like an eye for an eye punishment. If you killed someone than you would be killed.
Q2:What values or ideals governing the code are expressed in these excerpts? Hammurabi was the creator of the “eye for an eye” laws. However a hierarchy still exist inside these laws. If a crime occurs between two upper class citizens the punishment is equal to the crime. If a crime occurs between an upclass and lower class citizen a small payment is made for compensation.