Walmart De-Escalation Policy

2067 Words5 Pages

In recent news, a Utah court is pondering if the right to self defense superceeds a Walmart “de-escalation” policy, which led to the firing of six Walmart employees. (Kieler, 2014) The former Walmart employees’ behaviors appear to be within human nature to protect oneself and the organization. Why would Walmart view the former employees’ behaviors as damaging to the corporation? What are the impacts of the firings on Walmart’s remaining workforce? How do Walmart’s actions influence employer and employee relationships? The aforementioned questions come to mind when contemplating if Walmart made the right decision(s) following their employees’ actions. Although Walmart views their former employees’ actions as black or white, others within …show more content…

Amarsingh violated company policy. From Walmart’s approach, this alone would constitute immediate termination. My initial response, however, is to question the current JetBlue policy. Under the circumstance, I did not review the policy (as it is not provided), but I will make a few assumptions. First, is the policy supportive of organizational goals (vision) or is it a legal protection document, which corporate attorneys fabricated? My instinct leads me to believe that corporate legal gurus put the policy together in order to protect the company from lawuits. As the Vice President, I want all policies to reflect our company’s vision. Great leaders would not create a vision centered on “lawsuit prevention.” Leaders focus on developing an organizational vision (what the organization, as a team, moves towards) and all corporate policies support that …show more content…

(Dizik, 2010) Corporate policies, and training on those policies can mitigate the risk of customer-related disturbances. JetBlue failed to arm Mrs. Amarsingh with the proper “know how” on dealing with unmannerly customers. JetBlue is aware that “passenger frustrations” are increasing and flight attendants continue to be “walking targets” for intense customers. (Kinicki & Fugate, 2012, p. 170) Since the company understands the current environment, it is JetBlue’s duty to protect Mrs. Amarsingh, and all employees, from belligerent customers. JetBlue employees should not expect to fend for themselves against hostile patrons, without support from the corporate leadership. (Bloom,

Open Document