Violence In The Film V For Vendetta

1676 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Essay on v for vendetta

In the film, V for Vendetta, a man called V, acted by Hugo Weaving, starts a revolt on a forgotten day, November the fifth, against those who have committed heinous wrongdoings to him and also to the people of London. The people he takes his vengeance on identify themselves as good, but they really exploit their title of power. The endless thrill that takes place in this film keeps viewers engaged in not only the actions taken place, but the purpose behind those actions. The actions of V’s character are clearly very violent and wrong, but V states in the film that, “violence can lead to justice.” The government’s broadcasting wants the people of London to consider V’s tactics to be terrible acts of terrorism because the manipulative Chancellor Adam Sutler believes them to be. However, the truth is through these terroristic approaches, V wants the people to unite against the corrupt government and let them gain their freedom back. …show more content…

This statement is factually correct; without citizens there wouldn’t be any need of a government to be established. So, do V’s violent acts make him a terrorist or a freedom fighter? Well, according to the government officials in the movie and current legal laws in the United States, he is considered a terrorist. However, according to the people of London in the film and to Evey he is a freedom fighter. It is possible that he can be both terrorist and freedom fighter; for example an essay entry in Sons of Liberty: Patriots or Terrorists, Todd Kreamer said the Sons of Liberty in the American Revolution were a terrorist group fighting for American freedom

Show More
Related

  • Thomas Hobbes V For Vendetta

    1604 Words  | 4 Pages

    V for Vendetta completely encompasses and illustrates Thomas Hobbes social contract. As mentioned above, the people living in London were scared of what their society had become, and were willing to go to any length to fix their issues. The people handed over their rights to the Norsefire. The entirety of their rights were transferred to the new government with the Norsefire's promise of “strength to unity, unity through faith” (Moore,

    Read More

  • "V is For Vendetta": A Civics Lesson

    733 Words  | 2 Pages

    V’s plan or main goal in this movie is to bring freedom and justice to a cruel and corrupt society. He feels that citizens of the country are not allowed freedoms and rights which should be a must. Similarly in Civics class, we had discussed that in a democracy, citizens are assured that the government will protect interests in the form of rights (a freedom that is being protected, such as right to speech) and freedoms (power to act without unfair interference by an individual or state). So we can understand that...

    Read More

  • Comparing 1984 And V For Vendetta

    1354 Words  | 3 Pages

    In 1984, children are exposed to depravation by government ideals, and are taught to expose all insurgence. In Vendetta, children are born into a media-corrupted world, unknowing of deprivation by lacking exposure. These negate the modern belief that children learn beliefs and ideas unbiasedly. Without communication, relationships in 1984 are restricted, thereby maturation is controlled. To mature, Winston used a diary, visited illegal places and engaged in an illegal relationship to grow his confidence in his experiences. In Vendetta, people do not mature intellectually, attributable to controlled communication. V matures his character through illegal practices; by murdering for liberation, and engaging in a relationship with Evey Hammond. In 1984, relationships between people are forced for procreation, or are amicable to government ideals. Winston's desperation for emotion and connection lead him to engage with Julia, who assists Winston’s psychological insurgency. V serendipitously encountered Evey, who dependently aids V’s emotional understanding of a civilian's perspective of his actions. Both females helped mature the protagonists’ critical life experiences, analogously with modern human values to support and love others. The evaluative question, ‘what is the good life?’ is evaluated in 1984, with Winston’s perspective being nonsynthetic food, freedom, real history and the ability of expression. Similarly in Vendetta, V convincingly claimed that society too often, “Appreciate the comforts of everyday routine, the security of the familiar, the tranquility of repetition”, thus indicating ignorance of governmental corruption. 1984 Londoners are ashen ascribable to the permanent presence of dust, providing an atmosphere of inevitability, where dust asphyxiates Winston's spirit. Working 60 hour weeks and earning little

    Read More

  • V For Vendetta And 1984 Comparison Essay

    680 Words  | 2 Pages

    The approach towards freedom is hard to achieve against a totalitarian government, but possible to win with the people’s belief. 1984 by George Orwell and James McTeigue’s V for Vendetta portrays the same idealism of the anti-heroes, Winston and V. An anti-hero is “a protagonist who lacks the attributes that make a heroic figure, as nobility of mind and spirit, a life or attitude marked by action or purpose” (“Antihero”). Winston is not courageous, peaceful, and self-centered along the path of freedom for Oceania, whereas the anti-hero, V, is violent in his actions, impatient and careless in his pursuit to free London from the totalitarian government. As a matter of fact, V and Winston have the opposite behaviours; this is significant because it helps to compare the approach of the anti-heroes toward freedom. At the end of 1984 and V for Vendetta, the result of their approach is different from each other; Winston gives up on the liberation of Oceania, while V dies knowing that London is freed from Norsefire Party.

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of V For Vendetta Speech

    338 Words  | 1 Pages

    Rhetorical Analysis V For Vendetta The Speech Precis: The character V, in his speech to the citizens of London, suggests that words are the most powerful weapon one can possess, and the truth can be deep under the surface to reveal even greater power. He supports his claim by referencing historical events, relating himself to his audience, and even blames the people for the problems he is addressing, creating a sense of responsibility. V's purpose is to frighten, motivate, and inform the citizens so that they too will see that their world is corrupt, and cannot be tolerated any longer. He adopts a calm, yet firm tone to emphasize the gravity of what he is saying, while also trying to not act like

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Animal Farm And V For Vendetta

    1178 Words  | 3 Pages

    Through this dramatic irony Orwell is trying to picture to the audience the selfishness of the pigs, and so criticizing the selfishness of Stalin and the leaders of the Russian Revolution. The selfishness of totalitaristic leaders is also depicted in V for Vendetta. James McTeigue draws this idea into V for Vendetta through allusions to the Nazi Party and Hitler. This allusion is established throughout the film, with direct representations, such as the close up of the Nazi flag in Gordons house and through the symbolism of the finger men logo which vaguely resembles the swastika. Allusions to Hitler are also drawn straight from Sutler himself. The rhyming of Hitler and Sutler as well as during flashbacks of

    Read More

  • Marxist Criticism In The Film V For Vendetta

    1274 Words  | 3 Pages

    The setting of the film, as a whole, displays Marxist ideas of capitalism. One of the foundational themes of Marxist thought is that, within a capitalist society, there will be a distinct polarization between two classes: The ruling class (bourgeoisie), and those whom they rule over (proletariats) (Korczynski, Hodson, & Edwards, 2006, p. 33). V for Vendetta takes place in a not-so-distant future version of a dystopian England.

    Read More

  • Differences and Similarities Between V for Vendetta and 1984

    693 Words  | 2 Pages

    In “ V for Vendetta “ Fear became the ultimate tool of this government”. Adam Sutler is able to create a constant fear factor in the citizen’s mind by filtering everything that the media broadcasts. The attack on Old Bailey and Jordan Tower was deemed a “terrorist” act. V was labeled as a “psychotic terrorist”. The media claimed that V used explosives and weapons against unarmed civilians.

    Read More

  • Literary Criticism In Alan Moore's V For Vendetta

    986 Words  | 2 Pages

    History cannot be ignored when reading V for Vendetta, which is why cultural poetic criticism goes along with V for Vendetta very well. Alan Moore’s history, the state of 1980s England, and the decades leading up to it shaped the ideologies in the novel and it was those ideologies which became the driving force behind V for Vendetta. Under Marxist Criticism, Marxists generally view literature "not as works created in accordance with timeless artistic criteria, but as 'products' of the economic and ideological determinants specific to that era" (Abrams 149). Moore first came into contact with the middle class and better educated people when he started to attend Northampton Grammar School.

    Read More

  • V For Vendetta Film Techniques Essay

    923 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the film V for Vendetta the director James Mcteigue uses a range of different film techniques in order to gain the audience's attention and to make the movie more interesting. The four film techniques I’m going to focus on in this essay are editing, music, camera angles and the lighting. I am going to do this by analysing the ‘Domino Montage’ scene.

    Read More

  • The Role Of Thought In Measure Of Freedom In V For Vendetta

    2115 Words  | 5 Pages

    In the Locke-inspired film of V for Vendetta the disposition is that people should not be afraid of the government, but the government should be afraid of the people. The obligation of the people to revolt gives purpose as well a bigger picture of balance and a brighter future for the self and therefore the rest of community in seeking after noble ideals. Even if a political structure was to fail, it is better to have revolted in exercise of rights possessed than to have never truly experienced the adventure that is progression and deliberation. To stay silent in a time of oppression is one of the greatest sins that Abraham Lincoln pointed out, and that the freedom of one’s souls right to breathe should be verbally manifested as well. Taking Rousseau’s thought experiment of stripping away all cultural and human norms and then evaluating life should be part of the design of the political structure that is worth investing in.

    Read More

  • Anarchism In Frankenstein

    481 Words  | 1 Pages

    V may very well be a non-anarchist after all. He certainly justifies in his fight against the state, which is nothing more than a band of criminals, and while V appears to correctly understand that anarchy and chaos are two totally separate things. His torture of Evey demonstrates how he is willing to violate the nonaggression axiom. Considering that the nonaggression axiom is what anarchism is all about, his vile act of aggression against Evey throws out whatever certainty we might otherwise have that V is a bona fide anarchist. V is not an anarchist, it will have been his violation of natural

    Read More

  • Do People Obey Government Or The 'Law,' Out Of Fear Of Being Punished?

    1016 Words  | 3 Pages

    Like Hobbes Locke believed that revolt was necessary if a state failed to protect order, however Locke also justifies revolt by “In case of the abuse of power and the removal of rights” (Lectures.) This is where “V” finds some legitimacy in his quest for radical social upheaval. The abuse of power is obvious, but in some ways ok in exchange for order, however as Evy finds out in the film the Norsefire regime artificially created fear in the population, and therefore a greater reliance and need for themselves. The regime created the virus that decimated the rest of the world, sending it into chaos. Therefore

    Read More

  • Evey Hammond as a Revolutionary in V for Vendetta

    827 Words  | 2 Pages

    Alan Moore's graphic novel V for Vendetta is not only a call for revolution, but also an explanation of how such process should materialize. V, who transcends beyond a character and embodies the concept of revolution, establishes the procedure for social change. He understands that his role is to avenge and “make rubble” of injustice and corruption; however, true social reform must move beyond destruction and forge an improved society on the ruins of an oppressed past. Therefore, V adopts Evey Hammond, a young victim of the regime, as his protégée and educates her to guide society through the second stage of revolution: reconstruction. Evey's character embodies the stages of revolution, preeminently reconstruction. Through her, Moore recognizes not only the need for destruction, but also for rebirth in a transcendental revolution.

    Read More

  • Violence In The Movie Unforgiven

    1345 Words  | 3 Pages

    Unforgiven is a unique, nontraditional western. It shows us not how good triumphs over evil, but how the consequences of violence are dire and permanent. There is an anti-violence message purveyed by the movie, we see that violence is ugly, the brutal beatings and death do not come in neat tidy package as typical westerns would normally show, we see the toll that violence has on the characters and the real message in the movie is not that violence is bad and should be avoided, it is that violence can solve problems but there is an enormous cost to its survivors. Unforgiven highlights that violence is not an easy tool to use and can turn against anyone at any time, including the people who have been using it the longest.

    Read More

More about Violence In The Film V For Vendetta

Open Document