Along with many established universities, University College London (UCL hereafter) is located in the centre of a busy city. This prime location brings many advantages for its student population, such as easy access to a range of facilities and the latest research, in addition to encouraging greater participation in the vibrant local culture. At the same time, the university’s central location denies it the possibility of expansion to cater for ever-increasing numbers of students, and the local environment can make movement between buildings both dangerous and difficult. Furthermore, recent research has indicated possible links between health issues and urban university environments. It has been suggested, therefore, that UCL should look for a new site on the outskirts of London, and rebuild a modern university suitable for the 21st century. This essay will firstly discuss key arguments in favour of a possible relocation for UCL away from the centre of London, followed by the main reasons against such a move. It will aim to show that despite concerns over health, safety and space, modifications to the current site may in fact be preferable to relocating the entire campus.
The first reason for moving is the provision of larger, better equipped buildings. According to a recent survey, inner-city colleges almost all suffer from a lack of suitable classroom space, well-lit and well-ventilated laboratories and sufficient meeting places such as cafes (Edwards 2006, 101-102). In this survey, both UCL and Imperial College were near the bottom of the table and well behind universities in smaller cities or towns. On the other hand, students at out-of-town universities, such as Brunel, said in general that they were “satisfied” (ibid., 1...
... middle of paper ...
...like to feel they are “at the centre of a country’s academic life”. He argues, however, that more research needs to be conducted.
In conclusion, there are valid reasons both to move and to remain in the centre of London. On balance, however, it would appear that UCL’s loss of contact with the centre of the capital and the perception that it is no longer at the heart of British academic life are persuasive arguments against such a move. It would seem, therefore, that instead of relocation, the university will have to radically review current use of its buildings and resources in order to maximise efficiency and address problems of space, improve security arrangements and road safety within the vicinity, and conduct further research into student health issues. This will enable UCL to retain its current position as one of Britain’s top universities into the future.
No matter whether it is a facility being upgraded or a volunteering opportunity being organized, a university primarily strives to stimulate students’ enthusiasm, find their real interests, and establish a careful view of the world. Edmundson claims that universities undergo such changes because “Schools want kids whose parents can pay the full freight” (43). Despite the construction projects and campus upgrades, the quality of educational diversity relies on the students, a group of talents that is carefully selected by the admission office. The admission rate for elite universities has remained low for years. With more competition in the educational market, universities are still strict on their principle of recruiting talents. The better resources provided the more quality that schools expect to see from their students. The quality of teaching and the standard of education do not decline as a result of funding
Society’s expectation of Ian to strive for superior education in a big city holds a large role in negatively impacting his struggle to achieve his goals. Modern society has inclined towards a Charles Darwins Principles of Biology (1864) occupational system, or as Herbert Spencer coined: survival of the fittest. In current civilization, the competition in the job industry has become vastly augmented due to the influx of individuals striving for the maximum level of education possible. With this development of competition, location and degree of study is imperative to success in one’s future. The expectation to receive a higher educa...
First positive externality I face on campus is staying inside because everything that I need for studying is near: faculty, library, pavilion. It does not take a lot of time to get from my college to faculty or library.
Imagine the senior year of high school when students are poised to enter college and become adults. It's a time of responsibility, of being on one's own, and of shaping lives by making daily decisions. One of the major decisions is where to attend college. Should a person stay close to home and attend an in-state school where people and even campuses are somewhat familiar? Or should the decision be to start a completely new chapter in one's life by attending a college farther away, with totally new challenges? I believe the answer is definitely to leave town.
We all know that old saying “big fish in a small pond.” What about small fish in a big pond, Going to a big college campus to a small college campus can be really jarring or it really could be just that change you need in your life.
... research facility located close to a city rich is different prospects. The advantages of these important learning styles are what uphold the University of North Carolina at Charlotte as a school with deep values and comforting surroundings that houses students who value not only an exceptional education, but also an unforgettable college experience.
"University Policy on: Overcrowding in Venues and Teaching Spaces." The University of Western Australia. Web. 3 Feb. 2014. .
A recent survey asked college students the top reasons for re-applying to a university and the top reasons for not re-applying. They had around 58% of the university respond the survey which is around 793 students out of 1373 students (Cleave). The researchers found that the most influential reasons why students did return to school was because of the convenience and the social life (Cleave). On the other hand, the top reasons students did not return to college because of living conditions, and the shear cost of attending (Cleave). This survey further listed the reasons for not re-applying which were, students did not make good enough grades to be re-administered (low GPA), living carders were too noisy, to support a family, rooms were too small, food quality was poor, they had little to no privacy, residency on campus was too expensive, and taking out loans every year was putting them into too much
Hutcheson, P. (2011). Goals for United States higher education: from democracy to globalisation. History Of Education, 40(1), 45-57.
First we need to recognize the scholar's resources: nature, classification, and the presents of spirit. Second, we need to examine the duties associated with being a scholar: trust, honor, and the ability to dedicate ourselves to the institution in which we belong. Third, we need to go beyond our old ways of thinking we need to create a unique culture and traditions distinctive to this new Country.
In conclusion, the school should solve the housing problems for students regarding cost and small dormitories. To do so, the school should contract with apartments near Seattle central or extend the small dormitory. Furthermore, the school should stand up for student’s positions. The school should acknowledge the necessities of needing to improve these problems. If these problems are solved, students can put all their effort into studying and the school can retain competent students.
Students living on campus don’t have to worry about time because they live in the college. On the other hand, students who commute to school, have to worry about getting to class on time. Students living on campus don’t have to waste money on transportation or food since it is all covered under a plan. Unlike commuters, who aren’t covered under a plan, they have to pay more money to get to school as well as for food. Students who live on campus tend to know more people and they know more about what’s going on around campus. However, students, who commute, don’t have that advantage because they are home most of the time. Living on campus can be more beneficial than living at home in many ways.
In the present modern day, and seemingly for an extensive period of time, society has tended and still does, hold a predisposed idea that a university is associated with a building and the location that it is in. What society does not realise however the fact that it is a place to study where the location does not matter because towards the end you still achieve the same degree as anyone else.
The majority of students will be living by themselves for the first time, away from the support of their parents and siblings. Furthermore, living alone ensures that students must monitor and manage finances, clean their living quarters, and cook for themselves. The continuous practise of these skills ensures that students are equipped with abilities they will need for future living, thus improving their independence. Moreover, students often share a flat together. Living in close proximity to one another ensures that students develop their social skills. Aside from living away from home, the constantly monitored work, paired with the necessity to attend lectures, means that students learn to be organised, furthering their independence. In conclusion, a university education entails far more than simply attending lectures, completing coursework and taking exams. Students benefit from the diversity of social interactions offered in a university setting, and may encounter more opportunities through the social networks they develop. In addition, the ability to work independently and solve a range of problems will make them far more attractive to future employers. In short, gaining a degree entails far more than simply acquiring another
A Student 's life on University campus revolves around going to classes, studying in the library or in their own room, getting involved in co-curricular activities made compulsory by the university and sometimes hanging out with their friends to have fun after an exam. For many students who live in students accommodation being away from their family will require them to be independent and some students need quite some time to get adjusted to their new environment or they will be homesick or stressed. They need to practice housekeeping, to manage a budget, and to find their way around new place. Stress is also a part of every student’s daily life. It can be very damaging for students when stress becomes excessive. It can harm student 's health, happiness, work performance, relationships and personal development.