Disadvantages Of Strategic Planning

1979 Words4 Pages

15. Types of Planning. The reasoning behind the various types of related plans is explained here (Bartol, Tein, Matthews, Sharma and Scott-Ladd, 2011, pg 157 - 158):

Strategic planning. The reason for this high-level planning is to identify or confirm the organisation’s core values, mission or purpose, longer-term strategic goals and priorities for the organisation’s growth, productivity and profitability, and key strategies for their obtainment. Some 30 years ago organisations attempted to look at least 30 to 40 years into the future. However, today’s environmental uncertainties mean that the strategic planning horizon is about ten years only and the resultant vision of the organisation’s future now needs to be reviewed at least annually …show more content…

Once a strategic plan is confirmed, shorter-range tactical planning, which is narrower in scope than strategic planning, can proceed, which mainly involves determining how strategies will be implemented in the next year. Thus, tactical planning breaks down the strategic plan into shorter-term plans. The reason for tactical planning is to translate strategic plans into actions needed in the various functional areas of an organisation – such as marketing, manufacturing, operations, and finances (Koontz & Weihrich, 1990). While strategic goals were couched in general terms without financial projections, tactical goals have a shorter timeframe, are more precise expressed and likely to conform to SMART criteria, but no necessarily detailed in content. Tactical goals enable tactical planning to proceed. Tactical planning focuses on a single area of the business and traditionally produced at middle-management level (Riskope, …show more content…

Measure performance. During project execution it is important to measure actual progress. Such measurement often involves tools and techniques such as risk log, issues log, change log, accident register, progress reports, status reports, exception reports, site visits, variance reports, milestone slip charts, questionnaires, sampling and testing, reviews and audits, prototypes and trials, structured walk through, demonstrations, simulations, benchmarking, peer reviews, and earned value analysis. Jim tells me there is often a trade-off between cost to monitor and the value of the resultant information. Project control should be cost-effective. Thus, the need to monitor performance may be influenced by considerations such as (Young,

Open Document