Truth Commissions Before A Criminal Trial

445 Words1 Page
bulb-icon

Recommended: Strengths and weaknesses of the international criminal justice system

Criminal trials enable the international community to enact a system of justice against the perpetrators of crimes against humanity. This charter limits the scope and responsibilities of the tribunal largely to a role of accountability. Yet, one may argue that simply by levying charges against the accused, the international community has acknowledged crimes of the past. The purpose of the judiciary is to “investigate the specific acts of accused perpetrators” (Hayner, 22). Nevertheless, standard rules of evidence, which may exclude important or relevant information, limits the ability of the court to document the truth for historical record (Hayner, 107). Trials do not share the responsibility inherent in a truth commission to focus on the …show more content…

Although the international community does not recognize truth commissions as legitimate alternatives to criminal justice, such commissions offer a complementary approach that is able to initiate judicial proceedings. Furthermore, truth commissions enable the state to offer victims “the full and complete truth as to the events that transpired, their specific circumstances, and who participated in them, including the circumstances in which the violations took place, as well as the reasons for them.” (Hayner, 24) In transitional societies or developing countries, a truth commission may offer a more comprehensive approach to reconciliation and accountability than a trial (Teitel, 77). Such a setting facilitates framing the problem of transition in human rights terms (Teitel, 81). Furthermore, truth commissions provide a more variable depiction of justice. Transitional justice transects “legal, political, and religious language” that supplements traditional jurisprudence in areas of the world with developing judicial systems (Teitel, 82). Ultimately, truth commissions provide options for societies in transition, and a means through which to provide an accurate record of the past, restore personal dignity to victims, safeguard against impunity, and provide recommendations for institutional reforms to prevent new violations (accessed at

Show More
Related

  • The Pros And Cons Of The Nuremberg Trials

    2518 Words  | 6 Pages

    The Nuremberg Trials is considered being both a step forward in for society as it brought the birth of the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights. However, the tribunal was a step back for society, this is because the Allies implicitly designed it to be a show of ‘Victor’s Justice’.

    Read More

  • We Have NOT Done Enough to Respond to the Legacies of Historical Globalization

    868 Words  | 2 Pages

    How much more do we need to do before we start responding to these legacies? Works Cited United Human Rights Council. United Human Rights Council. N.p., n.d. Web. The Web.

    Read More

  • The History of Juries

    590 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the United States, jury trials are an important part of our court system. We rely heavily on the jury to decide the fate of the accused. We don’t give a second thought to having a jury trial now, but they were not always the ‘norm’.

    Read More

  • Dbq Essay On Human Rights Violations

    693 Words  | 2 Pages

    There have been many humanitarians that strive to help countries suffering with human right abuses. People think that the help from IGOs and NGOs will be enough to stop human rights violations. However, it hasn’t been effective. Every day, more and more human rights violations happen. The problem is escalating. People, including children, are still being forced to work to death, innocent civilians are still suffering the consequences of war, and families are struggling to stay firm together. Despite the efforts from the people, IGOs, and NGOs, In the year 2100, human rights abuse will not end.

    Read More

  • The Constitution's Ambiguity

    1142 Words  | 3 Pages

    For our government to function it must be able to resolve the conflicts that arise as a result of this ‘struggle’. The rule of law is the principle that enables reconciliation and its primacy to the successful implementation of our government cannot be understated. Simply stated t...

    Read More

  • Civil War Victimization Analysis

    681 Words  | 2 Pages

    Since this is true, states are less restrained by the potential risk of humanitarian consequences of their actions. However, global human rights norms do make a difference, but to what extent? This article explains that the U.S violated the fundamental norm to not target civilians on multiple occasions during the Iraq war, however it was not blatantly done; the targeting was done indirectly, and more secretive. The ability for the United States to commit these international crimes discretely, without repercussions displays the level of influence the United Nations has. However, when civilian targeting is discovered this is the point where international humanitarian norms come into play; states fear being shamed or illegitimated. Since the establishment of an international court there has been a reduction in this type of crimes against humanity. Actions such as torture during war has been significantly reduced because of its

    Read More

  • The Criminal Trial Process

    1065 Words  | 3 Pages

    The use of evidence and witnesses is a mechanism in which the law attempts to balance the rights of victims and offenders in the criminal trial process. Evidence used in court are bound by the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) and have to be lawfully obtained by the police. The use of evidence and witnesses balance the victims’ rights to a great extent. However, it is ineffective in balancing the rights of offenders. The law has been progressive in protecting the rights of victims in the use and collection of evidence and witness statements. The Criminal Procedure Amendment (Domestic Violence Complainants) Bill 2014, which amends the Criminal Procedure Act 1986, passed the NSW Legislative Council on 18 November 2014. The amendment enables victims of

    Read More

  • The Jury and Its Role in the Courts of Trial

    1507 Words  | 4 Pages

    The jury plays a crucial role in the courts of trial. They are an integral part in the Australian justice system. The jury system brings ordinary people into the courts everyday to judge whether a case is guilty or innocent. The role of the jury varies, depending on the different cases. In Australia, the court is ran by an adversary system. In this system “..individual litigants play a central part, initiating court action and largely determining the issues in dispute” (Ellis 2013, p. 133). In this essay I will be discussing the role of the jury system and how some believe the jury is one of the most important institutions in ensuring that Australia has an effective legal system, while others disagree. I will evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of a jury system.

    Read More

  • The Criminal Trial Process

    1108 Words  | 3 Pages

    The criminal trial process is able to reflect the moral and ethical standards of society to a great extent. For the law to be effective, the criminal trial process must reflect what is accepted by society to be a breach of moral and ethical conduct and the extent to which protections are granted to the victims, the offenders and the community. For these reasons, the criminal trial process is effectively able to achieve this in the areas of the adversary system, the system of appeals, legal aid and the jury system.

    Read More

  • Mass Incarceration In The Criminal Justice System

    2695 Words  | 6 Pages

    The criminal justice system is always criticized for a range of issues concerning the injustices that has taken place throughout history and even today. Many political leaders and social activists have sought to reform the criminal justice system; however, some have realized that there are systematic barriers that inhibit reformation. Political ...

    Read More

  • Arguments For and Against Juries

    692 Words  | 2 Pages

    ... In a speech to the House of Lords in 1844 Lord Denman remarked: 'Trial by jury itself, instead of being a security to persons who are accused, will. be a delusion, a mockery and a snare. The question of juror competence remains a recurrent feature in both the research and policy. literature (Horowitz et al., 1996; Penrod & Heuer, 1997). Indeed, in the. 1998 the Home Office invited commentary on whether an alternative to the traditional jury system was appropriate for cases of serious fraud.

    Read More

  • Exonerating Wrongly Convicted People

    2160 Words  | 5 Pages

    Criminal Law declares what conduct is illegal and proscribes a penalty. Although, we rely on our court system to administer justice, sometimes the innocent are convicted (Risinger). Most people would not be able to imagine a person who is convicted of a crime as innocent, sometimes that is the case. Imagine what a variance that is: an innocent criminal. In an article by Radley Balko he asks the question, “How many more are innocent?” In his article, he questions America’s 250th DNA exoneration and states that it raises questions about how often we send the wrong person to prison. The other issue that follows is the means of appealing the court’s decision and who they can turn to for help.

    Read More

  • Preventing Wrongful Convictions

    1088 Words  | 3 Pages

    Commissions must be formed to defend the wrongly convicted and inform the public of the horrific wrong that has been done to them. The objective of these commissions is to free those who were wrongly accused. They work to find evidence and reasons to exonerate the innocent. Good things can come from the public being informed about dire issues such as wrongful convictions. When people hear about situations like these they look to volunteer. Also the commissions are a great way to focus on gathering ev...

    Read More

  • The Role Of Victims Of The Criminal Justice System

    1024 Words  | 3 Pages

    Wemmers (1996) highlights that an effective criminal justice system also protects human rights. Victims are gradually being seen as the notable possessors of such rights that lead to reviews in our domestic system and also by international bodies. The protection of said rights, such as in South Africa where less express definitions between ‘victim’ and ‘human’ rights are being made by policy m...

    Read More

  • Witness Tempering Essay

    2070 Words  | 5 Pages

    Witness tampering: A never-ending challenge to the International Criminal Court? Introduction Jeremy Bentham, an eminent philosopher and jurist, portrayed the significance of witnesses in criminal trials when he stated: “Witnesses are the eyes and the ears of Justice.” The term ‘witness’ is neither defined under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (Rome Statute) nor under the Rules of Procedure and Evidence (RPE) to the Rome Statute. Per Black’s Law dictionary, “witness is a person who has knowledge of an event and whose declaration under oath is received as evidence.” There are several types of witnesses who can testify before the International Criminal Court (ICC).

    Read More

More about Truth Commissions Before A Criminal Trial

Open Document