Transformational Leadership Theory Essay

565 Words2 Pages

I absolutely agree with the “Transformational Leadership Theory”. It breaks down into two parts, one is Transformational Leader and the other is Transactional Leader. While Transformational leaders are charismatic, considerate and inspirational, they align workers goals with their own which helps employees focus more on their job and the well-being of the company rather than themselves. The Transactional Leaders are almost the opposite, they still make sure that the workers do their jobs correctly and behave properly, but in exchange for that, manager offers rewards. Whether its active manager by exception or passive manager by exception, both leave the workers to do their job and not interfere, only difference is that passive manager will only come to the rescue when something gone terribly wrong. I have worked at a place where my manager was a Transactional Leader, and the harder I worked the more money benefits I got and sometimes there were competitions and for winning you were rewarded with a gift of some sort, that kind of motivation made me work smarter and faster but there was no bond between the manager and I, now I have a job where the use of Transformational leadership is more common. My boss right now is kind, always make sure I am ok, to the point of, if it’s too hot …show more content…

They put workers first, focusing more on what the employees need and helping them achieve their goals. They understand personal and desires of their followers, their happiness is the ultimate goal for a Servant Leader. Even though that type of leadership approach is great for the employees, the production and the atmosphere of the company, the person holding that position is the only one who suffers. In order to put everyone ahead of him/herself, that person thinks about their own needs and wants last, sometimes sacrificing their own well-being. That is what makes me disagree with that kind of

Open Document