Tim O Brien's The Things They Carried

443 Words1 Page

Case 2: people in crisis need to find alternative truths, either in a friend or in literature. Sometimes a person needs to make up their own truth to survive a crisis situation, so long as the person does not reject other philosophies as Grendel does. This is often the case in war, when a person must distance themselves from the violence, the cruelty, the sheer disgust of the fighting. In The Things They Carried, Tim O’Brien writes that he tells war stories that are not “happening truth,” but rather a “story truth” that feels more genuine. In other words, often the depiction of a single, real event cannot convey everything that a person feels. According to O’Brien, a story can reveal much more by emphasizing or recreating everything that conveys the essence of the truth into a …show more content…

They share their truths and he his. Usually, this comes in the form of stories. His life is accepted by the others, and he accepts theirs, even stories “that swirl back and forth across the border between trivia and bedlum” (O’Brien 85) about girlfriends gone wild in Vietnam and sanity-depriving jungle music. There is no other choice in the war— communication is a natural form of coping. This is true of other situations of prolonged hardship— for example, the extended hostage situation in Ann Patchett’s Bel Canto caused the unlikely friendship between the hostages and terrorists that even caused love affairs between the two parties. Months of intimacy cause a friendship past tolerance, past intimacy: something more along the lines of clear, pure understanding. While the hostages and the terrorists have completely different roles, they become a homogenous group to survive. The terrorists and the hostages, like the soldiers, are saved by their ability to understand that everyone else shares their pain. It’s a different kind of group mentality than that of cliques, one that is forced and more

Open Document