Thomas Paine Rhetorical Analysis

764 Words2 Pages

Thomas Paine was a quite possibly one of the most important revolutionaries for America. He was an English-American political activist, philosopher and political theorist that wrote a political pamphlet, back in 1776, that was extremely influential in convincing colonists that declaring their independence was the appropriate thing to do during the revolutionary. This revolutionary pamphlet was named “Common Sense”. The pamphlet inspired people in the Thirteen Colonies to declare and fight for independence from Great Britain in the summer of 1776. In Common Sense, Paine challenges the authority of the British government and the royal monarchy. Thomas Paine was very direct in the pamphlet and addressed the common people of America. It was …show more content…

“Europe is too thickly planted with kingdoms to be long at peace, and whenever a war breaks out between England and any foreign power, the trade of America goes to ruin,because of her connection with Britain. The next war may not turn out like the last, and should it not, the advocates for reconciliation now will be wishing for separation then, because, neutrality in that case, would be a safer convoy than a man of war. Every thing that is right or natural pleads for separation. The blood of the slain, the weeping voice of nature cries, 'TIS TIME TO PART. Even the distance at which the Almighty hath placed England and America, is a strong and natural proof, that the authority of the one, over the other, was never the design of Heaven.” (Paine 6) He states multiple times in different ways how America did not need Britain to succeed as a country. In fact, America would have been better off without …show more content…

Thomas writes “In this extensive quarter of the globe, we forget the narrow limits of three hundred and sixty miles (the extent of England) and carry our friendship on a larger scale; we claim brotherhood with every European Christian, and triumph in the generosity of the sentiment. It is pleasant to observe by what regular gradations we surmount the force of local prejudice, as we enlarge our acquaintance with the world. A man born in any town in England divided into parishes, will naturally associate most with his fellow parishioners (because their interests in many cases will be common) and distinguish him by the name of neighbor; if he meet him but a few miles from home, he drops the narrow idea of a street, and salutes him by the name of townsman; if he travels out of the county, and meet him in any other, he forgets the minor divisions of street and town, and calls him countryman, i.e. countryman; but if in their foreign excursions they should associate in France or any other part of Europe, their local remembrance would be enlarged into that of Englishmen. And by a just parity of reasoning, all Europeans meeting in America, or any other quarter of the globe, are countrymen; for England, Holland, Germany, or Sweden, when compared with the whole, stand in the same places on the larger scale, which the divisions of street, town, and

Open Document