Thomas Paine Common Sense Essay

1495 Words3 Pages

Unequivocally one of the most historically and culturally-significant pieces of literature, Thomas Paine’s Common Sense has been meticulously analyzed for its effectiveness in eliciting the reaction that Paine himself intended in 1776. At the forefront of Paine’s pamphlet is “Thoughts on the Present State of American Affairs,” notable for its first sentence: “In the following pages I offer nothing more than simple, facts, plain arguments, and commonsense” (7). Within, Paine “elaborates” on three main points that strengthen the option of independence: the effects of British rule on the colonies; the plausible relationship with Britain upon reconciliation; the actual role of England as a parent country as opposed to England’s optimal role. However, …show more content…

Economically, the main benefactor of success in the American colonies was international trade. To funnel profits through only British merchants, Oliver Cromwell passed the first Navigation Act, which limited all imports of the colonies to be transferred on English ships. However, this first act was impotently enforced, and reform was imperative. Honing its economic control over its colonies, England passed an additional Navigation Act, albeit it was largely an upgrade to the former. All imports to the colonies were to only be transferred on British ships; correspondingly, all exports of the American colonies were forbidden to be disembarked on any country other than England (Elson 1). In fact, these acts were met with more consternation than the stemming of trade during a time of war. However, referring to the Navigation Acts, which were not mentioned in Common Sense, does not detract from the pamphlet itself, but is merely to expand upon the text. In reality, both utilized in conjunction assist in helping the reader understand Thomas Paine’s next point: the colonies’ future relationship with …show more content…

The author stems his views from this: “…PARENT OR MOTHER COUNTRY hath been jesuitically adopted by the King and his parasites…” (8). From this, Paine gives two examples of what he feels is misemployment of America by Britain, the parent country. Primarily, the author feels that a parent country must always keep the interests of the colony in mind. According to the pamphlet, Britain has protected America to uphold British interests, and that it has protected the people not from countries with ill will towards America. Continuing further, the author feels that in order for a world power, such as Britain, to rightfully control a colony, the colony cannot have a gamut of people of various nationalities. As “not one third of the inhabitants, even of this province, [Pennsylvania], are of English descent,” (8) Paine feels that the rule of Britain is unjust and selfish in that it controls a country whose inhabitants have no connection to the world power. Although I agree strongly with Paine concerning the information pertaining to Britain’s actual role as a parent country, I do not concur with what he believes is optimal rule as history has displayed otherwise. In short, Paine does not consider the dominant economic policy during the 18th century:

Open Document