Thomas Jefferson Vs Hamilton

1145 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Alexander hamilton vs thomas jefferson beliefs

American politics were fueling with passion, due to the adoption of the constitution. Ideas for the future U.S. were under the fire, especially between Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson. Hamilton, a federalist who grew up with a humble background, envisioned America a place where economy relied on commercial marketing and a national bank, an army with strong military advantages and a government inspired by Britain. Jefferson saw the United states based more on the French, with the nation held up by an independent agrarian republic with small militias instead of a federal army. Unlike Hamilton’s idea for a loose interpretation of the constitution Jefferson push for a strict construction. Jefferson’s goal was to limit the power of the federal …show more content…

like I pointed out before Hamilton based his ideal society and government off of British values. He believed a powerful respected government that is able to stabilize its society’s economy are crucial components for a working society. For instance, take his “law Enforcement” of 1794 expressing his plans to shape American economy, “the constitution you have ordained for yourselves and your posterity contains this express clause ‘The congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes, duties, imports, and excises, to pay the debts…” (Law Enforcement). Even though Hamilton has a loose interpretation of the constitution he is basically tell the protesters that they have chosen this path themselves and they must obey the Constitution to help their nation prosper from debts. In this excerpt he treats the protesters as spoiled children that need to be told what to do, because he treats them like this it is crucial to understand that he values an obeying society. He takes in consideration what society wants however the public must respond appropriately towards authority. Thomas sides more within the public than the government, standing his ground with small knit farmers for constructing the economy. On December 24 1798 he informs the public of how dangerous the Alien and sedition acts are towards their rights. “…Ought to produce universal alarm, because it is leveled against the right of freely examining public characters and measures and of free communication among the people thereon, which has ever been justly deemed the only effectual guardian of every other right” (Virginia Resolutions). He warns society that this limits their right of expression, furthermore it prevents them from analyzing the actions of government officials leaving the public defenseless. Next his ally James Madison claims that the Alien and Sedition acts are “Palpable violations” of the Constitution. He wants the

Show More
Related

  • Jefferson And John Adams Compare And Contrast

    154 Words  | 1 Pages

    Thomas Jefferson and John Adams were the last living individuals from the first American progressives who had confronted the British people and manufactured another political group in the previous provinces. Then again, while they both trusted stock in vote based system and life, freedom and the quest for joy, their conclusions on the best way to accomplish these standards separated after some time. Later, serving two presidential terms, Jefferson and Adams each communicated to outsiders their appreciation the other and their longing to recharge their friendship. Adams was the first to end the hush; he sent Jefferson a letter around the time of new year’s, in which he wished Jefferson numerous great new years to come. Jefferson reacted with

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Jefferson And Adams

    613 Words  | 2 Pages

    Jefferson and Adams Thomas Jefferson and John Adams were both strong presidents who kept a stabile nation, but they differed in their methods of doing so. Adams was a federalist so he helped establish a stable government by focusing on forming a strong central government. Jefferson being a democrat-republican worked to establish stability in the US government by promoting state’s rights. They both worked for stability in different but successful ways.

    Read More

  • The Fedarlist Papers - Ed Millican

    1329 Words  | 3 Pages

    Within the pages of One United People: The Federalist Papers and the National Idea, author Ed Millican dissects not only The Federalist piece by piece, but scrutinizes numerous works of other authors in regards to the papers written by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay. As a result, a strong conclusion asserts that the motives of The Federalist was to create a sturdy nation-state but above all, that American polity is far more complex than pluralism and a free-market economy.

    Read More

  • Strict Constructionism Dbq

    930 Words  | 2 Pages

    During the early 1800s America was still developing, trying to develop the government so it can learn to stand up on its own. Both Thomas Jefferson and James Madison played a key role in the country’s developing time, they created the idea of strict v. broad constructionism. Political parties were contradicting each other on the different point of views they had on the Constitution. Thomas Jefferson during his presidency sometimes made decisions that were based literally on the Constitution, whereas James Madison being a broad constructionist didn’t always take the Constitution literally.

    Read More

  • Federalist vs. Democratic-Republicans

    796 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Hamiltonians favored a strong central government, with the elastic clause allowing whatever power “needed” to the government. The elastic clause had a very loose construction. The government should use power to control and help with large trade. The high class people should have control over the people. People in lower classes were not trusted and could not make decisions for the nation. The Whiskey Rebellion was unconstitutional, rude masses of people did not understand the democratic ways, and think they can form a rebellious group every time a law they do not like gets passed. It showed that they need a strong government to prevent that from happeni...

    Read More

  • John Adams Dbq Essay

    1481 Words  | 3 Pages

    Even though John Adams (1735-1826) and John Quincy Adams (1767-1848) were father and son, also they were our President in the United States but they are not the same. The differences are their early lives, the early political career, and major presidential actions.

    Read More

  • Alexander Hamilton: Strong Central Government

    468 Words  | 1 Pages

    Alexander Hamilton was a Federalist. A federalist is Supporter of the Constitution during the debate over its ratification; someone who favored a strong central government. Hamilton believed in a loose interpretation of the Constitution. This means that he believed that the Constitution was a set of guidelines that did not need to be followed strictly. Hamilton wanted to expand the economy and increase the nation's wealth by using the power of the federal government to promote

    Read More

  • Did The Founding Fathers Create The Constitution Essay

    1108 Words  | 3 Pages

    He states that the government had too many leaders and not enough followers. That the government administrated by too many people who had a different motive on running the state. In addition, Madison agreed to what Hamilton was saying. Therefore, Madison helped Hamilton settle this dilemma. “It has been seen that delinquencies in the members of the Union are its natural and necessary offspring; and that whenever they happen, the only constitutional remedy is a force, and the immediate effect of the use of it, civil war.” (Hamilton) Hamilton father explains why this would be a problem with government and predicts what might happen if it reaches to that point. “To this reasoning, it may perhaps be objected, that if any State should be disaffected to the authority of the Union, it could at any time obstruct the execution of its laws, and bring the matter to the same issue of force, with the necessity of which the opposite scheme is reproached.” (Hamilton) Both Alexander Hamilton and James Madison wrote the 18th and 19th Federalist paper. The 18th article spoke about contradicting the argument of anti-federalists that proposed a monarchical rule in America. Madison states that if the anti-federalist and federalist do not collaborate on the rule that they established for the people. They would become like the people in Greek history. “Instead of this obvious policy, Athens and Sparta, inflated with the victories and the glory they had acquired, became first rivals and then enemies; and did each other infinitely more mischief than they had suffered from Xerxes.” Demonstrating a jealous view of power and disorganized fashion. “Their mutual jealousies, fears, hatreds, and injuries ended in the celebrated Peloponnesian war; which itself ended in the ruin and slavery of the Athenians who had begun

    Read More

  • Federalism Dbq

    585 Words  | 2 Pages

    However the federalist lost out to a new Republican government. Federalist saw a government that would be defined by expansive state power and public submission to the rule of elites however; Jefferson (a republican) said the American nation drew energy and strength from the confidence of a reasonable and rational people. “Once the legitimate party prevailed, Madison and his allies believed, the “monocratic” crisis would end, parties would be rendered unnecessary, and the high-minded decision of enlightened natural leaders would, at last, guide the nation.” (Wilentz, pg. 65). A strong central government would be one with checks and balances to keep fairness as well as branches to represent different parts of government. A strong government would also help to prevent riots and chaos in America when people did not like the decisions made. However, it still upheld the ideals of a weak central government where fairness of the people was in place. Incompletion the formation of the Republican opposition in the 1790’s continued the legacy of the American Revolution through inclusion of all Americans and fairness in the

    Read More

  • Jefferson and Hamilton

    978 Words  | 2 Pages

    Alexander Hamilton exerted the most influence in the new Federalist Party. He believed that only an enlightened ruling class could produce a stable and effective federal government. The government therefore needed the support of wealthy men. Thomas Jefferson and the Republicans defended more the rights of the common man and an agrarian society with little power from the federal government. His basic principle was "in general I believe the decisions of the people in a body will be more honest and more disinterested than those of wealthy men."

    Read More

  • Thomas Jefferson: Pragmatics over Doctrine

    624 Words  | 2 Pages

    During the period 1800-1817, the Jeffersonians to a great extent compromised their political principles and essentially “out Federalized the Federalists”. While traditional Jeffersonian Republicanism advocated a strict interpretation of the Constitution and an emphasis on an agrarian economic system, the actual policies of Presidents Thomas Jefferson and James Madison were markedly different from their theoretical principles. This obvious compromise of Jeffersonian principles is evident in the Federal government’s assumption of broad-based political powers and institution of capitalistic Hamiltonian economic reforms, both of which stemmed from Jefferson and Madison’s adoption of broad constructionist policies.

    Read More

  • Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton

    653 Words  | 2 Pages

    For sure, if one vision had prevailed wholly over the other, the outcome would be substantial in modern society; Hamilton’s vision would have created another England and Jefferson’s – who knows? Works Cited Jewett, T. (2005). Thomas Jefferson: Agronomist. Retrieved from http://www.earlyamerica.com/review/2005_summer_fall/agronomist.htm Tindall, G.B. & Shi, D.E. (2010). America a narrative history 8th edition.

    Read More

  • Thomas Jefferson Vs Martin Luther King Jr

    1523 Words  | 4 Pages

    Although the time periods and goals may be different the method for bringing about change is usually the same, this method is protest. Martin Luther King Jr.'s letter from Birmingham Jail, which was written in April 16, 1963, is a passionate letter that addresses and responds to the issue and criticism that a group of white clergymen had thrown at him and his pro- black American organization about his and his organization's non- violent demonstrative actions against racial prejudice and injustice among black Americans in Birmingham. And The Declaration of Independence was written to show a new theory of government, reasons why they were separating from England, and a formal declaration of war. It gave the 13 colonies freedom from England's laws. The man responsible for writing the Declaration was Thomas Jefferson. He wrote the Declaration between June 11, 1776 and June 28, 1776. Benjamin Franklin and John Adams looked at what Jefferson had written and made some changes to the Declaration. On July 4, 1776 Congress adopted the Declaration. This method is supported by two different people, in two different time periods, with two different goals; these two people are Martin Luther King Junior and Thomas Jefferson.

    Read More

  • Jeffersonian Era

    1285 Words  | 3 Pages

    Throughout the period dating from 1801 to 1817, the United States government was primarily controlled by the Jeffersonian Republican party, whereas the Federalist Party began to slowly fade away from public view. The Jeffersonian Republican party, led by Thomas Jefferson, professed to favor a weak central government through the support of more states' rights, "...that the states are independent... to...themselves...and united as to everything respecting foreign nations." (Document A). The Federalists of the United States were known as the loose constructionists, where if there is something which the constitution does not state, then it should be allowed to be done. The Jeffersonian Republicans were known as strict constructionists for their views towards the constitution that if there is anything that is not in the constitution, then it cannot be done. The Jeffersonian Republican party centered many of their political moves on the basis of creating a strong agricultural society with a weakly centralized government where each of the states have more rights to govern themselves, where the Federalist party believed more strongly on industrializing the nation and creating a strong central government. Even though strict constructionism was the idea behind the Jeffersonian Republican party, both Thomas Jefferson and James Madison both have evidence against them which can prove that they were not strict constructionists. This is based on different political moves made by these two presidents which are more towards the Federalist side of things opposed to their own Republican and strict constructionist ideas.

    Read More

  • Democracy In The 19th Century

    1358 Words  | 3 Pages

    During the construction of the new Constitution, many of the most prominent and experienced political members of America’s society provided a framework on the future of the new country; they had in mind, because of the failures of the Articles of Confederation, a new kind of government where the national or Federal government would be the sovereign power, not the states. Because of the increased power of the national government over the individual states, many Americans feared it would hinder their ability to exercise their individual freedoms. Assuring the people, both Alexander Hamilton and James Madison insisted the new government under the constitution was “an expression of freedom, not its enemy,” declaring “the Constitution made political tyranny almost impossible.” (Foner, pg. 227) The checks and balances introduced under the new and more powerful national government would not allow the tyranny caused by a king under the Parliament system in Britain. They insisted that in order achieve a greater amount of freedom, a national government was needed to avoid the civil unrest during the system under the Articles of Confederation. Claiming that the new national government would be a “perfect balance between liberty and power,” it would avoid the disruption that liberty [civil unrest] and power [king’s abuse of power in England] caused. The “lackluster leadership” of the critics of the new constitution claimed that a large land area such as America could not work for such a diverse nation.

    Read More

More about Thomas Jefferson Vs Hamilton

Open Document