Theories Of The Atonement: Ransom Theory

665 Words2 Pages

Part 6 - Theories of the Atonement: Ransom Theory

The Ransom theory of the atonement is one that has its roots in some of the earliest church fathers. Erickson agreed stating, "The theory with the greatest claim to having been the standard view in the early history of the church is probably the so-called ransom theory."[1] This theory declares that the atonement was primarily a means of ransoming humanity from the clutches of Satan.

Early proponents of the ransom theory were Origen and Gregory of Nyssa. Elmer Towns explained, "Endorsed by early apologists such as Origen and Augustine, and even contemporary authors C. S. Lewis, J. R. Tolkien, and the Seventh-day Adventists, simply stated this view contends that Christ's death was a ransom …show more content…

While Jesus did say that He came to give His life as a ransom to many, He did not intend to give it as a ransom to …show more content…

With this emphasis, it appears to make God look as if He were enjoying deceiving the great deceiver by hiding the deity of Christ. Erickson quoted Gregory of Nyssa stating, "The Deity was hidden under the veil of our nature, so that, as the ravenous fish, the hook of the Deity might be gulped down along with the bait of flesh."[5] Gregory of Nyssa even went so far as to justify his view of God's deception of Satan which suggests that the end result justifies the means. The Ransom theory fails in its attempt to explain the atonement of Christ. A view that is similar in many ways to the Ransom theory is the Christus Victor theory and will be analyzed in Part

Open Document