Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Analysis of chekhov
Analysis of chekhov
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The Uskov family in Anton Chekov's "A Problem" is in a dilemma. This is due to Sasha Uskov illegally obtaining a sum of money. As a result, the Uskovs are deciding whether to pay off his debt, or turn him over to the authorities. Personally, I would have had Sasha arrested and put to trial. There are two advocates for these contrasting ideas. They are Sasha's uncle Markovitch, and the Colonel, who respectively represent fighting for Sasha's innocence and discipline. Naturally, uncle Markovitch would like to defend his nephew from being incarcerated, despite there being substantial evidence against him. The Colonel however, being in the Military, instinctively attempts to put Sasha through trial as compensation for his theft. I agree with
A sportsman sketches, by Ivan Turgenev, tells several short stories about himself traveling around Russia. In some of these short stories, he writes about the treatment of the serfs. In the short story called The Agent, Turgenev tells us about an acquaintance of his named Arkady Pavlitch Pyenotchkin. A landowner and retired officer of the Guards, Arkady like many nobles of the time spends his life looking after his estate. In the treatment of his peasants he considers himself harsh but just, believing that peasants behave like children and need a good beating once in a while. He cultivates many French goods and speaks some French phrases but has a dislike for German philosophy. Turgenev prefers not to get involved with the man and only visits the area for the quality of the game to hunt. One night he was forced to stay at Arkady Pavlitch estate while traveling to Ryabovo. While their Arkady asks to accompany
During the Civil War, there were people who were extremely prejudiced against the 54th regiment because the soldiers were all different colored skin and the people where used to the idea that different color skinned people worked as slaves. In “Glory,“ Colonel Montgomery, the Sargent that trained and prepared them for war, and the colonel that was in charge of distributing necessities, served as the people who discriminated the African American soldiers. When he was teaching the soldiers how to march, some of them couldn’t tell the difference between left and right. He acted as if all African Americans were uneducated and they were hopeless to teach. Shoes were an essential part of training. Many of the African American soldiers didn‘t even have decent shoes when they enrolled for the war. Naturally, after all the training, their shoes wore down. If the 54th regiment were composed of white soldiers, the department that passed out shoes would already have prepared extra shoes for them. But since the 54th regiment was composed of all African Americans, the regiment was discriminated and there were no extra shoes for them. The other white generals thought the 54th regiment would never go on a battlefield and even if they did, they probably would all die. Therefore there were no extra resources for them. Another fact that there were some racist sentiments was that the African American soldiers only got a $10 pay while the white soldiers got $13.
For example, Annette makes the comment that Benjamin was in the right to smack Henry because he was defending himself from Henry’s assault of insults to which Alan agrees with immediately. Veronica and Michaels sense of righteousness involves other people, Veronica especially believing everyone needs to uphold a standard morality. For example, the idea of bringing Benjamin over. Veronica and Michael want to make sure Benjamin understands his implications so this situation won’t happen again. Veronica worries about their children having morals while Alan and Annette don’t care much for that. When arguing about whether or not Benjamin disfigured Henry, Alan shrugs off the fact that his son just smacked another kid in the face. He instead diminishes Benjamin’s injury saying how it’ll go away and he’ll chip in on the costs of the dentist. He’s not interested in the same sense of morality that Veronica is. These contrasting views come from how Alan and Annette are able to get away with more that Veronica and Michael. For the Novaks there are consequences to their actions, while in Alan’s case with the pharmaceutical companies he gets rewarded for defending
a dilemma is taking place due to its content. Based on moral obligations, the action to coming to
Dostoyevsky, a Russian novelist and writer, gave a great contribution to the exploration of human nature as well as development of deep and profound psychological character profiles. Usually this means that Dostoyevsky puts great emphasis on what an individual experiences and relationships between an individual and the society. In his master piece Crime and Punishment the author goes beyond just asking primordial questions like what is right and what is good. Dostoyevsky pleads us to go inside the mind and try to understand the reasoning process behind the crime of the main character Rodion
The Romanov family story is one that ends in tragedy and mystery. The Romanov dynasty ruled Russia for over 300 years coming to an end with Nicholas II. The book The Family Romanov: Murder, Rebellion, & The Fall of Imperial Russia, written by Candace Fleming, tells the story of Tsar Nicholas II of how he came to become the Tsar and fell trying to protect his family. Fleming tells the story of young Nicholas coming to power when his father, Alexander III, died and how ill-prepared Nicholas was to rule due to his father’s inferior teaching skills. The story goes on to Nicholas meeting his future wife, Alexandra, and how they had four daughters, Olga, Tatiana, Marie and Anastasia. With each daughter came a disappointment of not having an heir
Despite serving No 1 now, compassion and understanding did not disappear completely in Ivanov. He refrains from using physical violence against Rubashov; instead, through the twisted and complex logic of the Party, he tries to “recall him to his former acceptance of party discipline”, and persuade him, that he has erred. However, in the eyes of No 1, Ivanov has treated Rubashov too kindly, and he himself is later
The young boy Called Colonel Sartoris Snopes or Sarty was living with his family which included his father, Abner Snopes, which believed heavily in Blood Loyalty. Abner Snopes thinks of his family as himself and everyone else as “they.” In the Story Abner is blamed with burning down the barn of his landlord. The reader can easily see at the beginning of the story that Sarty is not okay with his father’s actions at the first trial, and he is uneasy about lying for his family. This uneasiness and the judge saying someone with the name Colonel Sartoris Snopes couldn’t be lying foreshadowed that his loyalty was to be tested again.
Leo Tolstoy as one of Russia’s great writers, wrote marvelous pieces looking at societal questions and playing with the minds of his readers. The Death of Ivan Ilych is one of Tolstoy’s best written short stories and a popular story for the world on the topic of death and the process of dying. This story is about a man confronting death and in a way bringing life to him during the process of his death. Ivan Ilych fell onto the inevitable trail of death and had realized the true meaning of living along the way. The concept of writing about death is not in any way a new concept nor was it obscure to read in Tolstoy’s era; what makes this short story special is the way that Tolstoy illustrates his character. Ivan Ilych goes through a journey of discovery while he is dying. This story attempts to tackle the questions that cannot be answered; what makes a man happy in life, what makes life worth living?
The question of how we determine what is right and what is wrong has been one that has plagued humankind for centuries. Although many have tried to answer this question there is still no definite answer. Adam Smith believes morals are grounded in sympathy and experience. Immanuel Kant however, is certain that morals should not be derived from experience but from pure reason. I for one believe that neither of these men are entirely correct. Both of their theories on morality are flawed in that one does not account for the human experience and the other takes the human experience too much into account. With this being said the only logical thing to believe is that morals should be derived from both reason and sympathy.
The 20th century has been a rough time for Soviet-American relations. Since its post-World War 2 enactment, The Cold War did more damage than previously thought. While not a single shell was fired during the war, the cultural embargo that was in effect ravaged each country. The effects of which are still felt in today’s modern society. Now, nearly 20 years after the ending of the Cold War, American and Russian cultural exchanges have started taking shape. While each culture is beginning to share and draw off one another, problems still exist. The problems of translating the language barrier in a post propagandized world have taken their full effect, and are playing heavily on the remnants of Cold War ideologies. By highlighting some problems
A Comparative Analysis of the Novels We by E. Zamyatin and One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich by A. Solzhenitsyn
Growing up in poverty stricken Russia, Anton Chekhov was forced provide for his family at an early age by writing short stories for various Russian periodicals while simultaneously attending medical school. Although his life was rather stressful at times, Chekhov still enjoyed visiting with family and friends both in Russia and abroad. He obtained a life long habit of having numerous affairs until he settled down in Yalta and married his wife Olga. It is said in a biography that his travels and personal experiences inspired many of his later stories such as "The Darling" and "The Lady with the Dog" (Silet 3). In these stories full of love and despair, Chekhov demonstrates a similar theme of emptiness in marriage, the struggles of Russian women in society, and the writing style of realism.
“To live anyhow is better than not at all” (Chekhov 1) , the short story, The Bet commenced with the conflict when the person had no choice but to choose between the death penalty or life in prison. The Bet was originally written by Anton Chekhov, a profound Russian short-story writer who concentrated a lot on human values and the reflection of the extravagantly selfish Russian nobility. And through The Bet he was able to express all those ideas in two sides, the banker and the lawyer with the conflict along the story line.
In Fyodor Dostoevsky’s drama, Crime and Punishment Rodion Romanovich Raskonlnikov exclaims, “I didn’t kill a human being, but a principle!” (Dostoevsky, 409). This occurs in part III, chapter VI of the novel when he’s battling with the confession of his murder he committed. In the beginning, Raskonlnikov, the protagonist of the novel, was a former student, struggling to get his life in order. He contemplates on whether he wants to assassinate his old land lady, Alyona Ivanovna, because he believes she was the cause for his debt. He finally slaughters her, and ends up slaughtering her sister, too, when she walked in on the murder. Afterwards, the crime he committed began to carp at his conscious psychologically. In a key passage of Crime and Punishment on page 409 , Fydodor Dostoevsky uses major themes, irony, language, symbols, and foreshadowing to emphasize the psychological effects that Raskonlnikov is struggling with before he confesses his murder.