The Tempest Comparative Essay

973 Words2 Pages

The excerpted statement, the elucidation of which is the primary concern of this essay, can be found in the fifth section of an article entitled "Nymphs and Reapers Heavily Vanish: The Discursive Con-texts of The Tempest" by Francis Barker and Peter Hulme. Through this comment, the authors have put forward their argument that, the play by Prospero and The Tempest are not essentially telling an identical story and for a brief moment the audiences are afforded a chance to make distinction between these two accounts.
In The Tempest we find, a number of events which disturbs the normal hierarchy of power relations and these disturbances have been collectively termed as ‘usurpation’. Barker and Hulme begin the fifth section with the assertion that, …show more content…

However, it is interesting to notice here that, the events depicting the failed and successful attempts of overthrowing the ruling party has not been embedded in the text as extractable themes but, “Rather, they are differentially embedded there, figural traces of the text's anxiety concerning the very matters of domination and resistance.” (Barker, and Hulme 786). If we take a look at the protasis, we would find that, Prospero recounts to his daughter Miranda the events that lead his exile to the island. On the first look this exposition seems a rather indispensible part of the play that informs the audience regarding the events predating The Tempest. However, a deeper exploration of the play would verify that, Prospero’s account has been consistently called into question by claims made by Ariel and Caliban respectively. It seems that, by some divine law of nature, Prospero and Miranda are the rightful owner of the land, where as the claim made by Ariel and Caliban are dismissed immediately. It is also fascinating to notice that, while both Prospero and Miranda are both depended upon the services provided by Ariel and Caliban, they each gets very dissimilar treatment. Ariel gets an expansive …show more content…

And thus the story of Prospero becomes the main plot and the story of Caliban and others becomes the comic subplot. And soon the main plot pushes the subplot from the prying eyes of the critics. However, the trace of real drama reveals itself when the elaborate masque conjured by Prospero vanishes, leaving hi quite perturbed. Although Prospero is able to recover very quickly from the situation it leaves a unique opportunity for the critics to study the potential fissure that helps us to pinpoint the exact position where the play of Prospero and The Tempest take their different paths. The interruption is important because The Tempest is one of Shakespeare’s last plays that possess a highly structured plot development. The sudden outburst in Prospero’s emotion and thereby the disappearance of the dancing nymphs are open to interpretation from different perspectives. Barker and Hulme provides a psychoanalytic interpretation of the incident as, the reason why Prospero is so much disturbed by the thought an impending attack by Caliban and his co-conspirators is the fact that, deep down Prospero himself knows he has no legitimate claim not only over the island as a ruler but also over the events that takes place in it. So far, Prospero has been able to maintain his composure but the fear rooted deeply in his mind distracts

Open Document