The Supreme Law System Of New Zealand's Legal System

809 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Unique features of constitution of new zealand

Under the current New Zealand legal system, there is no written constitution. Various elements including the Constitution Act 1986, the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 and the Treaty of Waitangi help to build our constitution. It is not in one supreme law document but instead is formed by a range of constitutional conventions, acts and documents . The three branches that make up New Zealand’s constitution are the legislature, the executive and the judiciary which are examined heavily within New Zealand’s Constitution Act 1986. By concentrating on New Zealand’s current constitution in comparison with the United States constitution, we can see how the power of the judiciary would compare in terms of its ability to act as a check on the other branches of the government under a supreme law constitution.
Unlike New Zealand’s Constitution Act 198, “The Constitution is the supreme document in the United States legal system ” therefore any other law that conflicts with it “can be declared void by the judicial branch of the constitution, the courts ”. Like the key constitutional concept in New Zealand, the separation of powers doctrine is included in The Constitution and offers an outline of the powers that each brand holds. The United States Bill of Rights is formed by the first 10 amendments of the constitution and reflects similar rights found in the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 although there are some key differences . Contrasting New Zealand, there is no overlap of the executive and the legislature and the judiciary (the courts) have more assigned power than in New Zealand. It does not fall behind the other two branches due to the written Supreme Law Constitution.
In New Zealand, Parliament has supremacy over both the e...

... middle of paper ...

...f Waitangi and make it enforceable rather than just an element in vague and uncertain constitution.
The creation of a supreme law constitution would enhance the judiciary’s ability to act as a check on the legislature and the executive. A written constitution would remove parliamentary supremacy and allow the judiciary to monitor the legislature and rebut against legislation that does not align with the constitution. Similarly, the judiciary’s ability to check the actions of the executive would improve by laying out formal written limitations of power. Ideally, introducing a supreme law constitution would formalise current constitutional conventions such as the separation of powers and the Treaty of Waitangi making them supreme in New Zealand. Overall, the judiciary would become more able to check on the branches of the government under a supreme law constitution.

Show More
Related

  • The Australian Legal System

    1301 Words  | 3 Pages

    Since the dawn of time for a society to work it needs to have a level of structure that applies to everyone and is understood by everyone. Australian legal system is broad and complex. It is the nature of the encompassing laws and regulations which reflect how people, organisations and governments behave on the many different levels of operation and these are created to make sure that everyone understands their rights and obligations. There are two sources of Law in Australia: Statute Law regulated by Parliament and comprise of legislations and acts; and Judge-made Law or Common Law where decisions made by judges are based on previous cases.

    Read More

  • Uncodified Constitution Of The UK

    1198 Words  | 3 Pages

    The absence of a codified constitution raises numerous questions. The main one being,

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of The Australian Constitution

    1026 Words  | 3 Pages

    In conclusion, equivalent contentions on the constitution being static or adaptable demonstrates that certain parts of looking at the constitution shows alternate points of view on whether it adjusts to the needs of the Australian public. Subsequently, the general population ought to be mindful of any alterations made or to be made to guarantee the significance and needs of the nation is fulfilled.

    Read More

  • Fairness in the Australian Legal System

    1299 Words  | 3 Pages

    Nowadays, the Australian legal system has three powers, which are legislative, executive and judicial. Legislative power is in charge of making the laws; subsequently those laws will be passed to the executive power to administer the laws it...

    Read More

  • Three Branches: The Impact on Law Enforcement

    1151 Words  | 3 Pages

    September 17, 1787, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; during the heat of summer, in a stuffy assembly room of Independence Hall, a group of delegates gathered. After four months of closed-door quorums, a four page, hand written document was signed by thirty-nine attendees of the Constitutional Convention. This document, has come to be considered, by many, the framework to the greatest form of government every known; the Constitution of the United States. One of the first of its kind, the Constitution laid out the frame work for the government we know today. A government of the people, by the people, and for the people; constructed of three branches; each branch charged with their own responsibilities. Article one established the Congress or Legislative branch, which would be charged with legislative powers. Article two created the Executive branch, providing chief executive powers to a president, who would act in the capacity of Commander in Chief of the Country’s military forces. The President of the United States also acts as head of state to foreign nations and may establish treaties and foreign policies. Additionally, the President and the departments within the Executive branch were established as the arm of government that is responsible for implementing and enforcing the laws written by Congress. Thirdly, under Article three of the Constitution, the Judicial branch was established, and consequently afforded the duty of interpreting the laws, determining the constitutionality of the laws, and apply it to individual cases. The separation of powers is paramount to the system of checks and balances among the three branches; however, although separate they must support the functions of the others. Because of this, the Legislative an...

    Read More

  • Constitutional Change In The Australian Constitution

    1733 Words  | 4 Pages

    A Constitution is a set of rules put in place to govern a country, by which the parliament, executive and judiciary must abide by in law making and administering justice. In many countries, these laws are easily changed, while in Australia, a referendum process must take place to alter the wording of the Constitution (Commonwealth of Australia, date unknown, South Australian Schools Constitutional Convention Committee 2001). Since the introduction of the Australian Constitution in January 1901, there have been sufficient proposals to alter and insert sections within the body to reflect the societal values of the day, ensuring the Constitution remains relevant to the Australian people. Although Constitutional reform can be made on a arrangement of matters, the latest protests on Indigenous recognition and racial references within the body of the Constitution has called into question the validity of racial inclusion, and whether amendments should be made to allow for recognition. This essay will focus on the necessity of these amendments and evaluate the likelihood of change through the process of referenda.

    Read More

  • The Inefficiency of the U.S. Constitution

    1287 Words  | 3 Pages

    The United States' Constitution is one the most heralded documents in our nation's history. It is also the most copied Constitution in the world. Many nations have taken the ideals and values from our Constitution and instilled them in their own. It is amazing to think that after 200 years, it still holds relevance to our nation's politics and procedures. However, regardless of how important this document is to our government, the operation remains time consuming and ineffective. The U.S. Constitution established an inefficient system that encourages careful deliberation between government factions representing different and sometimes competing interests.

    Read More

  • Structure of the Federal Court System

    1304 Words  | 3 Pages

    Before the adoption of the United States Constitution, the U.S. was governed by the Articles of Confederation. These articles stated that almost every function of the government was chartered by the legislature known as Congress. There was no distinction between legislative or executive powers. This was a major shortcoming in how the United States was governed as many leaders became dissatisfied with how the government was structured by the Articles of Confederation. They felt that the government was too weak to effectively deal with the upcoming challenges. In 1787, an agreement was made by delegates at the Constitutional Convention that a national judiciary needed to be established. This agreement became known as The Constitution of the United States, which explicitly granted certain powers to each of the three branches of the federal government, while reserving other powers exclusively to the states or to the people as individuals. It is, in its own words, “the supreme Law of the Land” (Shmoop Editorial Team).

    Read More

  • Rise of Judicial Power: Constitution and Marbury v Madison

    1791 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Constitution of the United States was ratified in 1787 and it established the powers of the federal government. Its intended purpose was to protect individual rights and liberties. It constructed the three branches of government that we know today: Executive, legislative and judicial. These branches created a separation of powers, in addition to check and balances. Originally, the judicial branch did not have much power when the constitution was written. It was not until the case of Marbury v Madison in 1803 that it actually established the judicial review. The judicial review is what gave the federal courts a great deal of power to void acts of Congress that they deemed violates the Constitution. After this case, the Supreme Court Justices

    Read More

  • The Importance Of The US Constitution

    1142 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Constitution is responsible for establishing and distinguishing the powers of the presidency, Congress, and the court system. It says that each state must acknowledge the laws of other states and that the Constitution is the supreme law of the land. The Constitution is made of seven articles and twenty-seven amendments

    Read More

  • Structure of American and California Governments

    9636 Words  | 20 Pages

    The United States of America is one of the most powerful nation-states in the world today. The framers of the American Constitution spent a great deal of time and effort into making sure this power wasn’t too centralized in one aspect of the government. They created three branches of government to help maintain a checks and balance system. In this paper I will discuss these three branches, the legislative, the executive, and the judicial, for both the state and federal level.

    Read More

  • Criminal Justice System and Law

    1239 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Supreme Court and Federal court have the same authority as in the Constitution. This system is called checks and balances which prevents the sole power of any one of the three branches. In addition, this power can be divided between the states and Federal government. The Federal government’s role in “domestic and foreign affairs and how they have grown” (Fe...

    Read More

  • The Australian Legal System

    1294 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Australian Legal System has a rich and detailed history dating from 1066. Law is made in Parliament. We have four sources of law and three courts with different jurisdictions that interpret the law when giving out justice. Important doctrines act as the corner-stones of our legal system. There is a procedure in the courts for making appeals. Separation of powers exists between officials in the courts, the parliament and the Executive. Everyone in Australia is treated equally under the Rule of Law, no matter their office or status. The Law is always changing as society changes, but it can never be perfect and cannot please everyone.

    Read More

  • Parliamentary Sovereignty Or The Rule Of Law Essay

    858 Words  | 2 Pages

    While an uncodified constitution has the advantages of dynamic, adaptability and flexibility to meet the ever-changing needs of the society , it poses much difficulty in pinpointing the ultimate constitutional principle that should provide legitimacy in the British constitution. This results in a battle between two broad schools of thought––political constitutionalism and legal constitutionalism.

    Read More

  • Judges Must Make Law

    2340 Words  | 5 Pages

    The strict supremacy of statute over judicial decisions and a tradition of literalism in statutory interpretation, 2. Where no legislation exists, the courts are bound by the doctrine of precedent in accordance with a strict hierarchy of judicial authority, 3. In the absence of a relevant precedent, the judges will be guided by legal principle and reasoning by analogy, and 4. There is a clear way of distinguishing the ratio of a case. A key feature of the unwritten constitution is ‘the separation of powers’.

    Read More

More about The Supreme Law System Of New Zealand's Legal System

Open Document