The Success of Louis in Overcoming the Problems He Inherited in the Period 1816-1820
Louis XVIII faced many difficulties during the period 1816-1820 due to
the previous French rule under Napoleon. This is because of the
Napoleonic wars of 1792 to 1815 and his reappearance in 1815 which had
a dramatic effect on the nation in almost every respect. As a result,
Louis XVIII had to contend with political, social, economic and
external difficulties where his decisions could have had a detrimental
effect on his hold of power. He was triumphant economically and
externally by solving problems. However, politically and socially
Louis accomplished successes but France was not stable in these areas
during this period for Louis to be considered successful. The problems
were merely avoided or not pressed upon in order to stay in the middle
path of political opinion.
The economic situation was dealt with in an efficient manner. The
finances of the nation from 1815 were revamped and French credit was
re-established owing to the experience of the ministers, Baron Louis
and Count Corvetto. They managed to develop a system of accounting
that was adopted to be extremely efficient. French finances after 3
years since the battle of Waterloo were stronger than their
counterpart nations in Europe with the exception of Great Britain.
What is more, this in turn re-establishment of credit in turn made
sure that payments of reparations were fast and prompt. This therefore
enabled France to be rid of the Allied army in a short period of time.
By 1817 Wellington had already consented to reduce it by thirty
thousand British soldiers. Therefore, the way in which L...
... middle of paper ...
...vision of the electoral law and rapprochement
with the Ultras. This is one other example of the apparent successes
of the liberal approach which Louis adopted. However, this only causes
governments and the public to be torn in two directions while the king
remains in the middle of the problem which means he leaves himself
isolated and open to criticism when a problem arises.
In conclusion, Louis XVIII was successful in dealing with economic and
external problems because this did not affect any different factions;
it was a benefit for the whole nation. Nevertheless, politically and
socially it was impossible to overcome these problems entirely because
there were many separate groups who shared distinct opinions. This was
impossible for all appease to be appeased so it was impossible to
completely overcome the problem.
... defeat the German Army, the French had to create strategies on how they were going to accomplish a victory over the German Army. World War I also brought new technology that would assist the men involved in the battle. A variety of new weapons were introduced to the French and German armies during the Battle of Verdun. One of the newest weapons was Diphosgene gas. Diphosgene was used to harm a large amount of people at once. It is a poisonous gas first introduced in World War I because of the effects. Henri Philippe-Petain possessed a huge quantity of supplies. Being prepared for the war was vital to the troops. They had to be aware of their surroundings while in combat and always have weapons handy because of the fear of a surprise attack. In addition, the strategies and new technology used by French were significant in the victory over the Germans in world war I.
One of the most controversial figures in European History, Napoleon Bonaparte has never ceased to be a generator of debate and analysis among historians, authors, and students. Napoleon has been closely scrutinized by many in attempts to defend or demote his motives, ambitions, and actions as Emperor of France. Nonetheless, those with true qualities of a ruler are few and far between – and Napoleon possessed the drive and ambition to bring these qualities to their full potential. Napoleon was the hero of nineteenth-century France, restoring the country to its former glory after the violence, instability, and turmoil of the French Revolution. Napoleon was the classic underdog, originally viewed as a “second-class Frenchman” due to his Corsican origins, but rising to success based on his own hard work and determination. He demonstrated the most improbable capacity for resilience; although he faced defeat on multiple occasions, he persevered and continually refused to surrender. As well, Napoleon was a protector and enforcer of “Liberté, Egalité, Fraternité” through the promotion of religious freedom and the nationwide application of French laws throughout his rule.
The later 18th century was a time of crisis for the old regimes of Europe and their economic systems and political agitation sometimes breaking out into revolts. English Industrial Revolution vaulted Britain to the fore. France was the most powerful and the most typical of the old aristocratic absolute monarchies of Europe. (lower taxes off backs of lower classes).
This gallant effort single handedly got the retreating American troops into a charge against the enemy, which in the end created a victory for the Americans and convinced the French to enter the war.
The French Revolution evokes many different emotions and controversial issues in that some believe it was worth the cost and some don't. There is no doubt that the French Revolution did have major significance in history. Not only did the French gain their independence, but an industrial revolution also took place. One of the main issues of the Revolution was it's human costs. Two writers, the first, Peter Kropotkin who was a Russian prince, and the other Simon Schama, a history professor, both had very opposing views on whether the wars fought by France during the Revolution were worth it's human costs. Krapotkin believed that the French Revolution was the main turning point for not only France but for most other countries as well. On the other hand, Schama viewed the French Revolution as unproductive and excessively violent.
The French Revolution began after some of the great philosophers such as John Locke, Voltaire, and Rousseau were establishing contracts and trying to create a way for people to have a government without a king or at least without a king being in control. The king during that time was King Louie XVI and his queen was a young woman by the name Marie Antoinette. The royal couple was not well liked due to the careless spending and lack of concern for the citizens beneath them. France was on the verge of becoming bankrupt and the crops did very poorly leaving people suffering, starving and fighting for food.
The French placed their defense in old, outdated tactics of static warfare. Gone were the days of two sides slugging it out against prepared reinforced defense structures. Closely integrating concentrated armor, infantry, and closely supported by aviation assets all combined to crush France in a matter of only six weeks. France was simply not prepared for this new age of warfare.
Napoleon Bonaparte did establish a dictatorship within France during his reign as Emperor. He introduced reforms that seemed to contradict the ideals and goals of the Revolution. However, the changes that he did make were usually improvements of those ideals or laws put in place to achieve those ideals through means that appeared anti-revolutionary and they transformed France into a superpower.
...a huge change to the way wars were fought and also prolonged the war for a whole five years.
they led to the success of the Allied forces. It will also discuss how the
13, General taxation is indispensable for the upkeep of the public force and for the expenses of govern...
... move, defunding any revolts they might plan, and preoccupying their time with petty social matters instead of matters of the state. If Louis’ reign was not supported by the enabling qualities of the Palace of Versailles, his reign would certainly not be as absolute as it was.
The French Revolution last from 1789 to 1799. This war had many causes that began the revolution. Its causes ranged from the American Revolution, the economic crisis in France, social injustices to the immediate causes like the fall of Bastille, the Convening of he Estate-General, and the Great Fear. As a result of this revolution there many effects , immediate and long term. The immediate effects were the declaration of rights of man, abolishing of olds reign, execution of king and queen, the reign of terror, and war and forming of the citizen-army. The long term effects were the rise of Napoleon, spread of revolutionary ideas, growth of nationalism, and the conservative reaction.
Each social class in France has its own reasons for wanting a change in government. The aristocracy was upset by the king’s power, while the Bourgeoisie was upset by the privileges of the aristocracy. The peasants and urban workers were upset by their burdensome existence. The rigid, unjust social structure meant that citizens were looking for change because “all social classes.had become uncomfortable and unhappy with the status quo.” (Nardo, 13)
prosperity and security in the old regime, and all he had to do was pay homage