Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The shawshank redemption film analysis
The shawshank redemption analysis essay
The shawshank redemption analysis essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The shawshank redemption film analysis
The Shawshank Redemption
The Shawshank Redemption" is a movie about time, patience and loyalty,
which is about how two men serving life sentences in prison become
friends and find a way to fight off despair.
The scene I am studying is the one when Andy escapes from the
Shawshank prison.
The main actors in this film are Tom Robbins as Andy Dufresne, Morgan
Freeman as Red and Bob Gunton as Warden Norton.
Settings are an important factor in a scene. The setting can give
clues to what is going to happen next in the film. The setting in this
film plays a big part in this film. The settings in the prison can be
totally different to the setting in other places. For example the
prison cells are dark, tiny, cramped, there is a tiny window, no
privacy and the only view is inwards. In contrast the wardens office
is much more luxurious, the room is spacious, tidy, comfortable, big
window. The big window represents the freedom where as in the cells
there is a tiny window. The pipe, which Andy escapes from, is
claustrophobic, dark and foul smelling. Only absolute desperation
would make someone do this. This represents his final trial. From this
kind of setting the audience can see how bad the living condition of
the prisoners really are. It also shows that the wardens live in a
mansion compared to the prisoners.
Costumes can easily affect the scene. They can tell the audience the
status of a person. If the person in dressed smartly then he or she is
usually a professional. The warden wears a suit, this shows his
importance and power in the prison. He is dressed smartly, and he can
wear what he wants, he is not bound by immediate aut...
... middle of paper ...
... of
special effects. The only special effects are the thunder lightning.
The lightning helped Andy escape. This shows the audience that nature
helped Andy escape.
The poster is very vital, it hides Andy's escape routes, and without
this there would not be an escape. The bible is also very helpful,
this hides the rock hammer. These two items are very important in the
film.
I think this scene is effective, it shows suspense, anger and power
being lost. At the end of scene they narrate the story very well, this
fills all the gaps in the audiences mind. I did not like the film as a
whole, some scenes where excellent but I thought the film just dragged
on, just get to the point. I also thought it was predictable, I think
you predict that Andy was going to escape. These are the reason why I
did not like the film.
Society can be very cruel; hopes and dreams can become reality or vanish away into the shivering winds. It is important to maintain hope when life is crumbling around you and freedom is what humans strive for in order to execute what they please during their existence on earth. Rita Hayworth and Shawshank Redemption by Stephen King, is a clear example of freedom combined with hope, illustrated by the characters of Andy Dufresne and Red. Andy, like Red, never loses hope of leaving prison; furthermore they gain a sense of freedom when departing from Shawshank. Having beliefs, in addition to fighting for what you believe is right are virtues that help you to strive for success which ultimately, lets you reach for freedom and hope.
The film conveys the feelings of the characters very well. Phillip Noyce uses lighting which always goes very well with the scenes even though he uses a lot of non-diegetic and contrapuntal sounds. The film?s shots are always correct and seem to have a purpose and the editing is wonderful.
In my opinion, this movie is boring and confusing for the first time but, from the second time, this movie starts reveal the fascination. At the first time, I do not like this movie so much but after I watched second time, I became to like this movie. If I asked
The movie teaches us to look beyond the cover and into who someone is as a person. We also learn that sometimes contact with people makes us reconsider our judgement towards them, to find out the real person underneath.
The movie is, most likely, done well enough to intrigue its intended audience. It captured the theme and story line of the book. It falls short, though, when compared to the beautiful, sensitive and contemplative prose of Natalie Babbitt. One could only hope that a viewing of the film will lead the watcher to try the book and be delighted all the more.
Quentin Tarantino’s 2009 film Inglourious Bastards entails a Jewish revenge fantasy that is told through a counterfactual history of events in World War II. However, this story follows a completely different plot than what we are currently familiar with. Within these circumstances, audiences now question the very ideas and arguments that are often associated with World War II. We believe that Inglourious Basterds is a Jewish revenge fantasy that forces us to rethink our previous understandings by disrupting the viewers sense of content and nature in the history of World War II. Within this thesis, this paper will cover the Jewish lens vs. American lens, counter-plots with-in the film, ignored social undercurrents, and the idea that nobody wins in war. These ideas all correlate with how we view World War II history and how Inglourious Basterds muddles our previous thoughts on how these events occurred.
film usually involves a criminal case. Someone gets murdered and the audience has to wait until the very
In one particular scene, director was truly a great one, featuring special focus on his dad life and the Colorado River. It was so cool to highlights of the movie by one of his favorite poem written by his dad when he was born, the Important Place. Also, this film was a good length, not excessively long but long enough to tell the story. This is really important today there were no such unwanted scene in the film, which literary the most closely and accurately delivered. In my opinion, this film is forced to possess the characters of a great aspect, and turns to make for quite the adventurous. There was no special character encounter rather than his dad, learned something from the secret Colorado River. Another great aspect of the film was the special footage that were introduce in this film was an enjoyable aspect to be a good documentary film, and that’s how this film is different from the rest.
Solomon Northup was a black man who was born a free man at a time when slavery was still legal in America. He was born in Minerva, New York, in the year 1808 (Northup 19). Northup’s father, Mintus, was originally a slave of the Northup family in Rhode Island. He was freed when the family relocated to New York. When he was growing up as a young adult, Northup helped his father with farming chores and became a raftsman for a short while on the waterways of New York. As an adult, Northup married Anne Hampton, who was of mixed heritage on Christmas day of 1829. Together, they had three children. Over the years Northup became a famous fiddle player, and this gave him recognition in his town.
In conclusion, details involving the characters and symbolic meanings to objects are the factors that make the novel better than the movie. Leaving out aspects of the novel limits the viewer’s appreciation for the story. One may favor the film over the novel or vice versa, but that person will not overlook the intense work that went into the making of both. The film and novel have their similarities and differences, but both effectively communicate their meaning to the public.
Each element helps each other by making the next scene better than the one before. It has the storyline come to live, and having people thinking what can happen next or who has the power in the movie. By seeing this movie it can make someone feel complete and satisfied for a long time.
make us see exactly what he wants us to and this film is a very good
A wise man once said, “Memory is the library of the mind.” All of the events in one’s life, ranging from birth to the present, are stored in this complex catalog of experience. There they remain untouched and collecting dust until a time of need, much like the scores of books found in today’s libraries. No matter how obscure, their topics represent the various trials of life that build one’s character and forever serve as the most reliable source of the human psyche. The novella, “Hope Springs Eternal: Rita Hayworth and Shawshank Redemption”, is part of a collection of stories that comprise Stephen King’s book Different Seasons which was first published in 1983. It is the story of Andy Dufresne, a successful banker incarcerated, despite his innocence, for the murder of his wife and her lover. Leaving behind not only his status, but every known aspect of his life up until this point, Andy is submerged in a culture he knows nothing about. However, he manages to adapt to these unfamiliar surroundings through the use of his former knowledge and keen intellect. King uses Andy’s character as a liaison to convey the concept of memory within the novella. He outlines the stages in Andy’s journey throughout his time in Shawshank Federal Prison by highlighting the many channels in which his wisdom aids him. Furthermore, King shows the reader how this passage develops Andy as a person through the different ways he utilizes this remembrance, both for his benefit and that of others. Andy’s heroic metamorphosis provides a template for the different perceptions of memory within the text; such as that of a self-fulfilling resource, liberating gift to othe...
...impossible to find myself anywhere but sitting on the edge of my seat. It was difficult to predict what would come next, constant suspense was all around. Thus, making the situations portrayed more interesting and entertaining to the viewer of the film.
There are many positive things and negative things about the movie and the story. In the movie