Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Discipline in class easily
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Discipline in class easily
There are a number of rituals and routines outlined in the “Rules, Rituals, and Routines” section of the text. The main ritual/routine discussed is the distribution of textbooks, one that can make or break the atmosphere in the classroom. In the example provided, the teacher was not very organized in the distribution of the books, thus holding up the flow, and eventual lack of completion, of the lesson he had planned. Simple things like that executed properly can make for a much better learning environment; had the books been handed out in a timely and orderly fashion, the students would have been able to start the lesson faster and likely would have been able to finish the lesson, as there would have been more time for the teacher to cut down on distractions earlier on (talking, etc.).
Class time is greatly related to student achievement if the class time is regulated properly. The quote from page 117 cites research that states when “more time
…show more content…
First, it reduces patterns of discrimination and gives relative equal opportunity to students regardless of race, socioeconomic standing, etc. and creating a different classroom environment. This, in my humble opinion, makes peers be able to be more cohesive and work together both in and out of the classroom regardless of any preconceived prejudicial thoughts or actions. Second, the concept of “ability grouping”, from my understanding, is similar to what I experienced in my time as a student in middle and high school; the practice of placing students on certain levels based on ability in a particular subject. Personally, math was not a strong suit, however English and reading comprehension was, thus the staggering of placement in those particular areas. One area of an individual’s intelligence should not automatically place them in a low-level track for all subjects, and it seems as though that train of thought (pun intended) is gaining momentum as it rightfully
Learning that having good time management skills has shown me that I can take my time and accomplish more. When relating this to school, I can honestly say that starting early is the best gift that I can give myself. As a full-time student with a family and a full-time job, my time is a limited resource (Britton & Tesser, 1991 pg.405). When I start early on an assignment, I don't have to rush and if I mess up, I can start over or seek help if necessary. My work schedule doesn’t always agree with my school schedule but for the most part, I try to have all of my school work completed by Thursday. As I'm approaching the last week in this class, I have began to look over the discussion posts first and then I look over the complete section to familiarize myself with the material before I even go to the read section (Chambers, 2015 pg.4). I found that to be especially helpful when I first began this class because the things that I already knew or felt like I knew, I went ahead and did it.
"Schools Give Extended Class Time a Longer Look." Gannett News Service. 18 Sept. 2006: n.p. SIRS Issues Researcher. Web. 15 Nov. 2013.
How widespread is ability grouping? No reliable national surveys of ability grouping in elementary schools have been conducted, but a consistent picture emerges from several local studies. According to the article “Ability-Group Effects: Instructional, Social, or Institutional?,” (Pallas, 1994) ability grouping for reading instruction appears nearly universal, especially in the early grades. Schools seek to create teachable groups of children within classes containing a broad range of skills, from students who independently breeze through children's novels to those who have yet to learn basic letter sounds. Ability grouping in math is less frequent and only in the upper grades, but remains rare at the elementary level.
The idea behind ability grouping, or tracking, is that “many school practitioners assume that grouping by ability promotes student’s achievement because, it is argued, all students learn best when grouped with students of similar capabilities or levels of achievement.”(Perceptions) There are many arguments for either side, thus begging the question “is ability grouping an efficient way to handle differences in student abilities?”(Education World) Contrary to today’s popular opinion, which naturally runs against the current educational structure of our schools, I believe ability tracking is an effective and worthwhile means of educating our youth, for a variety of reasons. Ability tracking promotes academic achievement, quality instruction, and is a means of student motivation. Unfortunately, those who do not participate willingly in the tracking program can easily become lost or distraught with the system. This having been said, I don’t deny the fact that many improvements can be made to the existing system as a means of expanding and providing opportunities to all those who desire success.
The issue of ability grouping has caused controversy in the education community. Some education scholars say that ability grouping. A study by Dallas Independent School District found that ability grouping not only helped the top groups of students, but the entire spectrum of students learned more than mixed-ability classrooms (Garelick 2). This is not a practice that benefits only the white, rich, or intelligent, but a practice that helps the entire student body. Joann DiGennaro reminded us that mixed ability groups hurt almost everyone involved because the top students are bored and unchallenged and the bottom students are left behind (DiGennaro 2). Ability grouping insures that every student in every school is challenged yet prepared, and prevents anyone from being left behind or ahead. It is the duty of the education to meet the needs of every student, and ability grouping is a medium to insure that the goal is met.
I mentioned earlier that within my own school, we have a problem with segregation between students that take different classes. While not an official program, my school system does have a practice of tracking students together based on achievement levels. Starting in elementary school students tend to grouped based on their academic ability. Often times you will see students of color and students from low-income families in what are often called the “bottom” classes. The students many times are then stuck in the classes that do not have the same high expectations as the one or two classes of our “top” students. Those “top” classes are often times over represented by the white students as well as students from more affluent families. Going back to Orfield, et al (2010), one way to keep this from happening is by “detracking” students (p 25). Oftentimes students are labeled at a young age and sent on track that will carry on all the way through graduation. Minority students, ELL students and students from low income families generally do not test well at young ages and then are put on track of education that has lower expectations than their peers that are from affluent white families. According to Orfield, et al (2010), schools that use detracking strategies for their students often see increased
...ing periods for each lesson within a unit will consume too much time. The time factor needs to be analyzed further.
“Power is exercised only over free subjects, and only insofar as they are free. By this we mean individual or collective subjects who are faced with a field of possibilities in which several ways of behaving, several reactions and diverse compartments may be realized.” (Foucault)
Brint, S., & Cantwell, A. M. (2010). Undergraduate time use and academic outcomes: Results from the university of California undergraduate experience survey 2006. Teachers College Record, 112(9), 2441-2470.
When a school or teacher groups students “based on their ability or achievement,” the school is practicing between-class ability grouping (Santrock 125). In many cases, between-class ability grouping is used in a high school setting as a way to group students with similar goals and skills. On the surface, between-class ability grouping appears that it benefits all students because it allows teachers to better teach students in a more focused manner. However, researchers have determined that this form of grouping harms those that are in a lower ability group (125). Recently, when I was helping out at a lower achieving high school this form of grouping was clearly evident. Students were clearly divided into classrooms based on their abilities. Each classroom was going over the same material but each classroom teacher was teaching the material differently to meet the needs of that group of students. The history classroom that was deemed an advanced placement class worked a lot smoother and the students had a good understanding of the subject as well as appropriate behavior. However, the “average” history
This policy can also prevent weaker students to have low expectations or perceptions on themselves. If they are grouped based on their abilities, it may convince someone who is in a class based on "lower ability" that he/she is dumb or limited and should not expect to achieve as much in life as the "higher ability" students. We all know that low expectations of oneself usually result in a low level of accomplishment. Therefore, the current policy can avoid stereotyping any kinds of students.
Heibutzki, Ralph. How Lack of Time Management Affects College Students. Demand Media, 2009. Web. 15 Nov. 2013
Another ritual that is done is the sharing of space in the classroom. This is important because by learning to share space with the teacher and students it teaches them social and behavioral skills. There have been incidents where students don’t share their playing space with others or class materials. It is so important to discipline students who have issues with sharing because in life you need to share with others and learn to be nice and respectful about it. One other ritual that is important for the flow of the class is transitions that occur throughout the day. The students have a set schedule every day where they transition say from lunch then to library time then to math center time etc. By having transitions happening in the classroom this gives students the opportunity to learn their schedule and lets them know what comes next in the day. One more ritual that I think is important for the flow of the class is the end of the day procedures that is followed by the teacher. What happens in the classroom that I noticed is that the teacher first asks the students to wipe down their desks. Then they are asked to put their chairs up on their desks and after that they are given their homework for the night which they put in their folders to take home. After that they wait for the announcement to go outside for recess and then after that they are
The first part of the research focuses on the difference between perceived study time and actual study time as well as how this affects students’ progress. A few interesting hypotheses were brought up in the research. Basically, they state that students overestimate time needed to complete arbitrary academic tasks and that students, who practice time management, have more resistance against stressful situations as well as complete their tasks faster. Unfortunately, the actual experiment has shown that the hypotheses were not close enough
When a lower tracked student is placed in the low-ability class, the placement can destroy a child’s confidence as well as promote inequality (Enns 2015). As the lower tracked education quality is much lower than a higher tracked classroom, there is a disadvantage for students who actually want to learn. There is not much encouragement for the lower-ability students because expectations are significantly reduced (Enns 2015). Despite being in a high-ability class, a child may feel pressure because he or she has to compete with other kids with the same intellect. When a child feels the need to compete, it could harm his or hers confidence level as well (Holloway 2003). A homogenous approach creates inequality within society because tracking is based off on an individual’s social background. Therefore, tracking will create a divide between the minority and majority groups. The majority dominant class has the upper-class advantage meaning that their children are most likely to be in the high intelligent class due to the extracurricular within their lives. While the minority is placed in the lower tracked class, they are given the lower quality education that they do not deserve (Enns 2015). Nevertheless, according to Paton (2012), the mixed approach was thought to have a its disadvantage because it might put high-ability children at a disadvantage. Parents were scared that the lower-ability children would hold their high-ability children back academically (Paton 2012). Having said that, the parents are wrong, as it is not another child’s fault in why their children are not pushed to their full potential. It is the teacher’s responsibility to provide more challenging lessons for the more intelligent children. The teachers are the ones who should push their students to their full potential (Paton