The Reliability Of The Dark Sucker Theory

The usage of vague and opinionated premises in the theory of the “Dark Sucker” causes some second guessing and misconstrues the reliability of the theory. In comparison to the standard “Photon Emitting” theory, the Dark sucker theory does not produce a clear explanation of why a light bulb should be considered a Dark Sucker. The Dark Sucker theory cannot be proven better than the scientific theory of the way that light is emitted and visual to human eyes. The Explanations that are given by the Dark Sucker theory can all be re-explained in vivid details, along with common scientific laws, such as its reason for the black smut, which can be re-explained through science as the residue left from the heated material as it is burnt during the transfer of kinetic energy from the atoms as they explode and transfer energy from one another. The Criteria of Adequacy can also further prove why

According to the Criteria of Adequacy, the Photon Emitting theory does not interfere, or differ from things that are proven by scientist as laws, and valid theory’s that never fail to explain under any circumstance. Scientist have studied and tested the cause of light emission and energy through years of test and adequate trials, which is why much of the proven ideals become laws after many test, in which, the outcomes never change. Their studies allow them to produce artificial light creators through their knowledge and proven facts that photons emit light during the transfer kinetic energy. These theories are proven and because the dark sucker theory goes against proven theories it breaks the criteria of adequacy in terms of conservation. The