Over ten million people use marijuana regularly even though it is illegal, which clearly shows that the government’s anti-marijuana campaign has been useless (“NORML Report on Marijuana”). The government should stop spending scarce federal funds on the campaign against marijuana, and use that money to conduct more research so that the Food and Drug Administration can approve the legalization of marijuana (Grinspoon, “Whither Medical Marijuana” 27). No amount of research is likely to show that marijuana is as dangerous as tobacco and alcohol because marijuana is a harmless drug. If marijuana had official medical uses, then people would be more likely to accept it. Also, the legalization of marijuana would be regulated so it would not be a threat to society and its users.
The United States has introduced the Foreign Corrupt Act Policy to disallow any bribery in foreign Markets whether or not the country allows it, it is merely enough that you belong to The U.S. that you follow their ethically values wherever your business may go. We need to educate these countries and their youth about the bad problems derived from smoking before they get hooked. We weren’t aware of the initial effects smoking had on us, and this allowed it to be socially acceptable.
Guns do not kill people; people kill people. Cigarettes do not kill people; people who choose to smoke are killing themselves. The health risks of using tobacco are common knowledge. It is a known fact that if someone smokes their chance of getting lung cancer is increased drastically, yet so many Americans choose to do so. The FDA is taking steps to tighten the rules of tobacco marketing, some of these rules will include prohibiting self-service tobacco displays in stores, restricting vending-machine sales, and forbidding most free samples of tobacco products.
Even though e-cigarettes can potentially reduce health implications to both users themselves and the public, there is a huge concern that the nature of e-cigarettes may lure non-smokers to start engaging in such addictive behavior. Up to date, there is limited information and testing on the levels of nicotine and other chemicals which e-cigarettes imposes on users and the public. Thus, neither have the Food... ... middle of paper ... ...conventional ones might give people the perception that e-cigarettes are equally as harmful as conventional cigarettes, hence affecting their sales. However, as identified earlier, there are nonetheless many potential concerns that e-cigarettes indirectly pose to the public. Hence, while e-cigarettes have the potential to help smokers manage their addiction, there is a need for a strong regulatory framework to control the possible concerns.
Advertising i... ... middle of paper ... ...cohol is not hypocritical. Yes there is drunk driving, alcoholism and liver cancer but comparing the immediate health affects of cigarettes to alcohol, the dangers of tobacco use is much higher. I understand the consumer point of view and if I was an uneducated smoker I would want to continue smoking. If there is more global awareness about the risks of cancer and and other diseases that could be preventable from not smoking than more people would continue to quit. Tobacco companies could start making profit off of nicotene gum and more products that will help people quit to stay out of bankrupcy while helping the population quit cigarettes.
Tobacco use is a big controversy in many parts of the world and the topic of banning the advertisement of these products has been around for many years. Some countries have placed bans with success in declined of users however they are faces with pros and cons from many parties. Banning Tobacco Advertisement in India People in favor of the ban, such as the government, argue that it is for the benefit of the public’s health, since it does not restrict the trade of tobacco. Furthermore, since advertisement can be viewed by adults and children alike, the lack thereof increases the chances of younger generation being less likely to develop a habit. In the countries that have successfully implemented and maintained bans on tobacco advertisement, a
Regular cigarette users are now using electronic cigarettes to kick their habits of smoking tobacco to the curb. Studies have shown that electronic cigarette use is more helpful than nicotine patches for the smokers who are wiling to quit. Fairchild and Colgrove provide an article debating on whether electronic cigarettes should be banned from society and the benefits of the e-cigarette “The Case for Tolerating E-Cigarettes”. The authors incorporate a simple approach to establish that nicotine is not good for anyone who uses cigarettes. Therefore, a well-known alternative to cigarette users, electronic cigarettes were created to reduce the harmful effects associated with smoking cigarettes.
ng children and teens are the easiest target for Tobacco Companies. Tobacco Companies have found ways to dodge the restrictions and regulations that the Federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA) have put into action. Though Tobacco Companies claim their forms of advertising does not influence children and teenagers, their advertising techniques and icons clearly have a huge effect on young audiences. Some people may wonder why there are restrictions on tobacco advertising, and others will give facts to argue reasons why. The FDA believes Tobacco Companies aim their products towards minors though Tobacco Companies deny they do, yet they claim their target audience is from the ages 18 through 21.
Electronic Cigarettes should be outlawed Electronic cigarettes are more accessible to kids aged 18 and under. Today in the U.S there is a debate about cigarettes being outlawed. Although people in the U.S believe that e cigs should be outlawed because they are easier to access for kids under the age 18 they are causing kids to get hurt by e cigs; however some people might say E-cigs are enjoyable and are better than regular cigarettes. Others might say that E-cigs are just nothing but water vapor and can’t harm you. But, what they don’t know is that it’s more than just water vapor there is a lot of poisonous chemicals involving the liquid.
In their promotion, they claimed light cigarettes were softer and safer option for women and people who need to switch to low level of tar and nicotine. They marketed light cigarettes as a healthier smoking choice. Nevertheless, they refer to it as a first step of quitting smoking altogether. The introduction of this new brand affected people disproportionally. The governments at first supported the idea of the new brand because it was for the concern of the heath of individuals but later on, they began to have doubts about it.