The Pros And Cons Of The Atomic Bombs

1591 Words4 Pages

On August 9, 1945 the United States committed one of the most inhumane acts of all time. When the U.S dropped the atomic bomb, “Little Boy” over Hiroshima, Japan; about 140,000 people were killed or died months after from radiation after effects (Mason, 2014). Three days later, about 80,000 people died in Nagasaki, Japan when the U.S dropped the second bomb over the city (“Hiroshima,” 2016). Not only did many people die in these places, many buildings and homes were destroyed because of the explosion of the bombs. Other countries were clueless as to the construction of an atomic bomb. Most countries were shocked when they heard the news. Terror, anxiety and agony were felt by the Japanese people, due to the horrific crime of the United States. President Truman made the choice to launch the atomic bombs in order to bring the war to an …show more content…

It was actually unnecessary for the United States to do this because the Japanese government was going to surrender anyway. Many critics that analyzed the military decisions insisted that Japan was forced to bend to the will of the Allies, even if it brought shame to their nation forgiving up (“Hiroshima”, 2016). For this reason, the U.S did not need to drop the bombs on Japan because Japan would have to surrender, since their military was defeated in other attacks. According to Barnes (2016), the estimate of the amount of lives of troops and civilians were way too high to be realistic. If the United States had waited for Japan to surrender, then the estimated lives of many people being lost would not have been accounted for because Japan would not have continued fighting in WWII. Therefore, the United States was not justified in dropping the atomic bombs because Japan was bound to surrender and the United States caused a lot of unnecessary casualties that would not have occurred if they had let Japan surrender on their

Open Document