The Pros And Cons Of Standardized Testing

488 Words1 Page

“Children are like wet cement, whatever falls on them makes an impression” -Hain Ginott
“Schools use externally mandated written examinations to assess student progress in specific curricular areas and to aid in a variety of administrative and policy decisions.”1 This standardized testing started roughly in 1875. Since this time it has only caused unwanted stress for not only students but teachers alike, and not only does it cause stress but it can place high risk students at an even higher risk, reduce curriculum, and give a false sense of security.
Standardized testing has been known to put stress on students teachers and school faculty members. These test are stressful for not only the fact that the teachers are graded on the performance of the students for classes but the school is also ‘graded’ by the test scores of the students. This can drive cheating by students and teachers through the roof. At one point 80 Arizona educators were asked to depict what they felt standardized testing does to students and classrooms. The resulting images showed test-driven classrooms where boredom, fear, and isolation dominated. The plain …show more content…

They emphasize math. So what is this showing every student that ever has to take one of these tests? Maybe it’s telling young students that science, art, music, and basic life skills don’t matter as long as they can pass a tests. According to these tests the talents and abilities of the students that schools and state seemed to care about will never matter, student are reduced to a number and a score. Not only does it tell children that uniqueness is unimportant standardized testing is also given to every student whether they are from a posh rich school or an under-funded school the students are given the same test. It gives kids from lower income families a disadvantage that can lead to them not graduating high school or dropping out entirely. (Test

Open Document