Social psychology centres on a subject or person who has universal characteristics which can be studied independently of the social context.
Social psychology is a broad amalgamation of sub disciplines with various differing ideas of best practice. Generally, Laboratory based psychology (i.e. the experimental method) focuses more on the individual as if they have universal characteristics than some other forms of social psychology. As we move into a society that increasingly favours the notion of the “individual over the social”, psychology appears to be shifting in the opposite direction with much of contemporary psychology becoming increasingly interested in context and its impact on behaviour. There are certainly issues with removing the
…show more content…
(Burkitt, 2017 cited in Taylor, 2017) The idea of the monad is relevant when considering psychology from the standpoint of the current political climate, which favours neoliberalism. Neoliberalism is a policy model where individuals are deemed to act autonomously and competitively (specifically in a capitalist free-market context)- in short, as a Monad. (Taylor, 2017) This idea enables psychologists to study a subject without social context. If the individual behaves in a way that is uninfluenced, psychology doesn’t need to consider any social reasons for behaviour.
Experimental psychology typically favours the idea that the individual acts as a self- contained unit. To use a study as an illustration, Milgram’s famous experiment regarding authority uses the experimental method. (Milgram, 1963 cited in Gibson, 2015) – participants were asked to press a buzzer of increasing voltage, and, the experimenter would respond to questions using a list of predetermined prompts to reduce their influence on participant behaviour. This was deemed enough to assume that the participant acted in complete autonomy, and results were therefore, for the most part,
…show more content…
Holzkamp was concerned particularly with experimental methods and believed that they didn’t account for ‘psychology from the standpoint of the subject’ and developed “critical psychology”- a method which aims to dissect and question previously taken- for- granted ideas in psychology that assume the individual acts outside of the context.
Other research methods look to combat the experimental approach, and align with Holzkamp’s view that context is important, that the experimental method is simply one way of attempting to understand the individual. For example, Dr Alex Bridger (2013) discusses that society largely has heteronormative understandings of the individual. An example then, is a person who identifies as homosexual, exploring a space. (Bridger notes this type of study is categorised as psychogeography- the environment and its impact on the individual.). Instead of studying their subsequent experiences using heteronormative assumptions (i.e. the assumption that a male might be particularly interested in where women might congregate, as a crude example), psychologists might look to explore his own experiences as a gay man, And the impact that context might have on his experience of the environment. To add to this, Taylor (2017) introduces the notion that individuals are multiphrenic.
Social Psychology is the scientific study of how we influence, affect, and relate to one another. Social psychology is studied to see how the influence of others can impact how we act. This can be seen in many aspects in life. Most specifically, social psychology can be seen in movies. Recently, I have viewed the movie Shrek which was released in 2001. Shrek is a kid’s movie about an ogre named Shrek who rescues a princess from a castle for Lord Farquaad in order to regain his swamp and privacy. During this process, however, Shrek falls in love with the princess and discovers a secret about her. While watching Shrek, I have noticed that many theories and concepts from social psychology were apparent in the film.
By looking at Milgram’s experiment we can see how certain elements play a part in making our decisions. Like when the Teacher asked the experimenter who was going to take responsibly for shocking the learner. The Teacher was more willing to continue the experiment when the experimenter was in a lab coat instead of street clothes. From the experimenter wearing the lab coat the teacher saw him as superior individual making the teacher more likely to obey. Whereas the experimenter wearing street clothes made the teacher uneasy to obey his command to continue shocking the
The study of psychology began as a theoretical subject a branch of ancient philosophy, and later as a part of biological sciences and physiology. However, over the years, it has grown into a rigorous science and a separate discipline, with its own sets of guidance and experimental techniques. This paper aims to study the various stages that the science of psychology passed through to reach its contemporary status, and their effects on its development. It begins with an overview of the historical and philosophical basis of psychology, discusses the development of the various schools of thought, and highlights their effects on contemporary personal and professional decision-making.
(Rodrigo) Thus, when the higher power in the room is the one telling them to keep going, the experimenters feel as if it is not their responsibility and they continue with the shocking. However, Parker criticizes Milgram for not conveying all of the information about the experiment. Parker expresses that the test subjects had no way out, or felt trapped, like they had no alternative to obeying the authority figure (Parker 98). The power of situational influence on obedience in society has tremendous implications, as shown by Milgram in this experiment. In an article by Saul McLeod titled "Milgram Experiment", he goes as far as to say that ordinary people are likely to follow orders given by an authority figure, even to the extend of killing an innocent human being (McLeod). When people are placed in situations such as Milgram's experiment, one's own beliefs and morals can easily be
In 1961, Stanley Milgram, a Yale University Psychologist conducted a variety of social psychology experiments on obedience to authority figures. His experiments involved three individuals, one of them was a volunteer who played the role of the teacher, one was an actor who played the role of the student, and one was the experimenter who played the role of the authority. The teacher was instructed by the authority to administrate shocks to the student (who claimed to have a heart condition) whenever they answered a question incorrectly. The voltage of the shock would go up after every wrong answer. The experimenter would then instruct the teacher to administrate higher voltages even though pain was being imposed. The teacher would then have to make a choice between his morals and values or the choice of the authority figure. The point of the experiment was to try to comprehend just how far an individual would continue when being ordered by an individual in a trench coat to electrically shock another human being for getting questions incorrect. The experiment consisted of administrating pain to different people and proved that ordinary people will obey people with authority. Some of the various reasons are that the experimenter was wearing a trench coat, fear of the consequences for not cooperating, the experiments were conducted in Yale University a place of prestige, and the authority f...
The Milgram obedience experiment began in July of 1961. The experiment was conducted by Stanley Milgram, a psychologist at Yale University. The experiment was met to measure the willingness of participants to obey an authority figure who instructed them to perform an experiment that was against their moral views. Milgrams participants for his experiments were from all backgrounds. The subjects ranged from college graduates to people that had not finished grade school. (Milgram’s Experiment on Obedience to Authority)
Social Psychology is the study of how we think and relate to other people. These psychologists focused on how the social situation influences others behavior. We see social influences everywhere we go, but might not notice it. Like when watching a movie for fun you do not notice it as much as when you are actually looking for the behaviors, like in the film The Breakfast Club. There are several examples of social psychological behaviors in the film.
The birth of psychology was in December of 1879, at Germanys University of Leipzig (Myers, 2014, p.2). In 1960, Wilhelm Wundt and Edward Titchener defines psychology as “the science of mental health” (Myers, 2014, p.4). However, two provocative American psychologists, John Watson and B.F Skinner, redefined psychology in 1920. They redefined psychology as “the scientific study of observable behavior” (Myers, 2014, p.4). The problem arose when psychologists realized people could not observe feeling or thought so they needed to come up with a new definition for psychology. We define psychology today as “the science of behavior and mental processes” (Myers, 2014, p.4). Psychology includes many subfields such as human development, social behavior,
The Milgram experiment is probably one of the most well known experiments in Psychology. The reason being is because its participants were not told what was really occurring in the experiment. After the experiment was over, the participants were mentally and emotionally affected. Later, a cognitive psychologist, George Miller described Milgram’s experiments, together with Zimbardo’s Prison Experiment, as “being ideal for public consumption of psychological research” (Blass, 2002). And indeed, Milgram’s studies, as Zimbardo’s, are clearly meant to be spread to a broad audience, the moral and preventative objectives permeating the experiments from their very outset (Stavrakis, 2007).. In this paper, I will explore how experiments such as Milgram and Zimbardo’s, as well as the Tuskeegee Syphilis Experiment, changed the way experiments are conducted today because of the formation of the Institutional Review Board (IRB).
...nated in order to have production, psychologists needed to find ways to identify human qualities; this was done through Methodological Individualism. Psychologists have formed tests, and the education system, as well as employment assessments; this has been used in society to identify specific traits which can then be used by the capitalist society to identify the people that will fit in to their system. Furthermore, psychology deducts individuals with mental illnesses to allow pharmaceutical companies to market “cures”. In essence, Methodological Individualism was created by psychologists in an alienated society run by capitalism, in order to enhance capitalism as it was the only way that a new discipline of study could have grown in that society. The capitalist economy supports the field of psychology if the research from psychologists supports the market economy.
Psychology is a social science that aims to study the mind and the behaviors of humans. It aims to understand what drives humans to act the way they do. It differs from sociology and anthropology in that it takes accounts the individual rather than society as a whole.
Watson, J. B. (1994). Psychology as the behaviourist views it. The Centennial Issue of the
Hergenhahn, B.R. (2009). Social and Theoretical Psychology: Conceptual and Historical Issues 1. An introduction to the History of Psychology. 1 (1), p1-28.
Somerville, John. The Strange Case of Modern Psychology. The Journal of Philosophy. Vol. 31. October 1934. pp. 571-577.
The development point of view of social psychology has changed the understanding of human nature in relation to social contexts. Social psychology is the study of how individuals act, think, and feel in relation to the context of society. Furthermore, social psychology concentrates on how other people influence an individual’s behavior, thoughts, and feelings. Basically, social psychology has changed our understanding of human nature as it investigates how an individual’s behavior influences a groups’ behavior or internal mechanisms; attitude or self-concepts. Post-World War 2(WW2), researchers were curious to investigate the reasonings for why people follow orders, despite the potential repercussions of those actions. Furthermore, social experiments are usually applied to demonstrate key