The Pros And Cons Of Darwinian Medicine

584 Words2 Pages

Darwinian medicine is a radical approach that considers why evolution has not “freed” humans from disease. Traditional medicine, for example, would examine who contracted a cold, why, and how to treat the symptoms. Evolutionary medicine examines the interplay between virulence, transmission, natural selection, and evolution in an attempt to understand why anyone would catch a cold. This presents a potent example. With a pathogen like a cold, generation time is short, mutation rates are high, and genetic information can spread rapidly through a population. Therefore, evolution (a shift in gene frequencies within a population through time) can occur in weeks (as opposed to the slower pace most commonly associated with evolution). Evolution occurs via natural selection. Pathogens meet the requirements of natural selection by having variability of heritable traits which impact their reproductive success in comparison to others in the population. Consider the heritable and highly variable trait of virulence. Evolution predicts that those pathogens with high virulence must also have successful transmission when their host is …show more content…

Others include defenses, genes, and design compromises. Some health practitioners treat symptoms without consideration of evolution. This is dangerous both to the individual and to society as a whole. If a fever is viewed as a highly evolved bodily defense, then the decision to treat that fever takes on a new level of consideration. If iron deficiency is a defense to chronic infection, should a supplement be prescribed? If the defense threatens the well being of the patient, then treatment is necessary. If the defense presents discomfort, but is fighting the pathogen, treatment may present the greater danger. On a societal scale, failure to consider evolution combined with over prescription of antibiotics to treat bodily defenses has lead to “superbugs” resistant to

Open Document