Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ethical dilemma about animal rights
Should animals be in captivity
Should animals be in captivity
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Ethical dilemma about animal rights
Human fascination for lions and tigers has prompted circuses, such as Ringling Brothers, to hold these feline animals in captivity for entertainment. However, these actions are morally impermissible because it causes unnecessary harm and suffering, therefore compromising the animal’s welfare (21). Furthermore, the moral issue that arises is whether these circuses are minimizing the level of discomfort their animals experience. The basis of these arguments is not whether lions and tigers have the same mental capacity or communication skills as humans, but the ability to feel pain and discomfort. Not to mention, the capacity to feel suffering should be the basis for moral consideration to provide these animals a stable environment that allows …show more content…
These animals require an ambient temperature range, similar to that of humans to survive and live comfortably (124). However, traveling circuses do not invest in air conditioning or heaters. Therefore, subjecting their animals to extreme heat and cold, which fails to complement their required temperature range (124). A study by Texas A&M University revealed that Ringling Brothers made their caravan of tigers experience 86 degrees Fahrenheit temperatures for more than ten consecutive hours …show more content…
Shows comprise of predatory animals like tigers and lions performing tricks through the command of a trainer. This gives the wrong impression to children that these animals are used for amusement and as objects (127). Rather than highlighting the ecological significance and the need for conservation towards these animals, children will most likely remember them as animals that perform (128). Further implications can increase exotic pet trade, under market values, the price for a lion or tiger cub is $2,500 (127). The survival rate for these cubs are slim because 98% of all exotic pets in the United States die within the first two years (127). These are the results of treating wild animals as mere objects for human
In conclusion, I agree with Tom Regan’s perspective of the rights view, as it explores the concept of equality, and the concept of rightful treatment of animals and humans. If a being is capable of living, and experiencing life, then they are more than likely capable of feeling pleasure and pain, except in a few instances. If humans are still treated in a respectable and right way even if some cannot vote, or think for themselves, then it is only fair that animals who also lack in some of these abilities be treated as equals. As Regan puts it, “pain is pain, wherever it occurs” (1989).
Goodall argues that her readers have an ethical obligation to protect animals from suffering, but she also implies that it might be necessary sometimes to abandon that obligation. She points out that animals share similar traits with human beings: they have a capacity for certain human emotions, and they may be capable of legitimate friendship. Goodall’s evidence for this claim is an anecdote from her research. She recounts that one chimpanzee in her study, named David Greybeard, “gently squeezed [her] hand” when she offered him food (62). Appealing to readers’ emotions, Goodall hopes to persuade readers that the chimp is “sociable” and “sentient,” or feeling (62). According to Goodall’s logic, if researchers are careful to avoid tests that cause human suffering, they should also be careful to avoid tests that cause suffering for other life forms.
Both in and out of philosophical circle, animals have traditionally been seen as significantly different from, and inferior to, humans because they lacked a certain intangible quality – reason, moral agency, or consciousness – that made them moral agents. Recently however, society has patently begun to move beyond this strong anthropocentric notion and has begun to reach for a more adequate set of moral categories for guiding, assessing and constraining our treatment of other animals. As a growing proportion of the populations in western countries adopts the general position of animal liberation, more and more philosophers are beginning to agree that sentient creatures are of a direct moral concern to humans, though the degree of this concern is still subject to much disagreement. The political, cultural and philosophical animal liberation movement demands for a fundamental transformation of humans’ present relations to all sentient animals. They reject the idea that animals are merely human resources, and instead claim that they have value and worth in themselves. Animals are used, among other things, in basic biomedical research whose purpose is to increase knowledge about the basic processes of human anatomy. The fundamental wrong with this type of research is that it allows humans to see animals as here for them, to be surgically manipulated and exploited for money. The use of animals as subjects in biomedical research brings forth two main underlying ethical issues: firstly, the imposition of avoidable suffering on creatures capable of both sensation and consciousness, and secondly the uncertainty pertaining to the notion of animal rights.
Mulkeen, Declan and Carter, Simon. “When Should Animals Suffer?” Times Higher Education Supplement 1437 (5/26/2000): p34
Wildlife department officers seized 137 tigers and transferred them to animal refuges. The officers found 60 jars full of tiger cubs frozen and bottled up with also other endangered species’ carcasses and pelts and a cache of other parts and products in the freezer including tiger skins. The tigers at the temple ended up being sedated by the monks to make them calm. They were chained so close to the ground that they were not able to stand up. The monks removed the tiger 's’ claws and teeth so they wouldn’t hurt the visitors or themselves. The tigers were kicked, punched and pulled by their tails. Their own urine was squirted in their face at close proximity and baby cubs were taken from their mothers after two weeks instead of being two years like in the wild. The Ringling Brothers Circus was ordered to pay a fine of $270,000. They had violations from the Animal Welfare Act of improper handling of dangerous animals and no veterinary care. Having no veterinary care caused trauma, behavioral stress, physical harm, unnecessary discomfort and poor maintenance of their enclosures. The tigers were forced to live in tiny cages, no bigger than their own bodies. They were forced to perform and interact with the other animals during the day and not allowed to sleep at night. The cubs were also taken away from their mothers at an early age. The circus even gets away with their
Hills, Alison. "Do animals have right?" In Chapter 13: Science and Suffering, by Alison Hills, 199-218. Cambridge: Icon, 2005.
Even the lives of the owners can be put in danger when it comes to these creatures. The owners think that because they have raised the exotic animal that it will do no harm to them or others. That is not entirely true in some cases. No matter how trained these animals may be or how close they are to the owner they still have their wild life natural instincts. Good Morning America on the ABC network reported the death of a zookeeper called the tiger whisper back in April. Stacey Konwiser worked every day, one-on-one with the tigers until one day the tiger turned on her. Emergency crew airlifting Konwiser to a nearby hospital where the 37-year-old was later pronounced dead (Pilgrim, no page). Even this professional zookeeper, who worked with the tiger everyday was not able to keep it from its natural instincts. These animals were born in the wild and there is no telling when they will snap. Owners need to be more aware of the dangers they are putting their lives in and the lives of others.
Animals should not be kept in captivity These poor defenceless creatures are being held hostage in cages and every time you go to the zoo and pay them, to get in, to get food, to ride the train, you are helping them earn profit for taking these animals away from their family and the only home they've ever known. Imagine how scared they must be. I know I would be terrified. Zoos have been around for centuries, in the early days of zoos, animals were often diseased and treated poorly. Nowadays things are much better but it still isn't right to have animals locked up in cages.
Before divulging into the biological aspects and psychologically driven actions that prove sympathy in animals, one must understand the reason why the presence of sympathy in animals seems to be a novel concept. Contemporary animal compassion is primarily driven by access to information about the cruel treatment of animals particulary in slaughterhouses and labs. Therefore, this information is one of the primary causes of widespread animal compassion. In 1995, “two-thirds of Americans agreed with the following statement: ‘An animals’ right to live free of suffering should be just as important as a person’s right to be free of suffering’” (Leslie and Sustein).
“Virtually 96 percent of their lives are spent in chains or cages,” and “11 months a year they travel over long distances in box cars with no climate control; sleeping, eating, and defecating in the same cage,” as stated by PAWS, Protective Animal Welfare Society, is one of the many organizations that strives to protect animals right and sheds light on this horrific situation that should be stopped at once. This is an insight of what the animals have to endure just for our entertainment. PAWS also discuses when these animals are eventually allowed out of their cages they undergo “extreme ‘discipline’ such as whipping, hitting, poking, and shocking with electrical prods,” for training purposes to ensure that the performance goes without any complications. The transportation of theses animals is cruel and unusual no matter how it is looked at.
Animal welfare is a serious aspect to consider in relation to different farming facilities. Animal welfare is defined as the well-being of animals. This is a controversial topic, which is due to the nature of the definition of "good" and "bad" and morality with respect to animals. Farmers attempt to balance the welfare of animals along with trying to maximize the productivity of the farm as well. There are four main aspects to animal welfare: good feeding, good housing, good health and appropriate species-specific behavior performed by the animals.
While in transit, animals are confined in boxcars, trailers and trucks. During transit, tigers do not have access to food, water, and veterinary care. They are forced to live in tiny, cramped cages, no bigger than them. The cages remain chained in arena basements or parking lots. Since they are forced to live in cages, they are also forced to eat, drink, sleep, defecate and urinate in the same place. The tigers don’t receive any exercise besides, when they perform. This reason is because they are held captive. Captive results in the tigers being overweight, while the others suffer from psychological damage. The unnatural environment causes them to pace back and forth and sometimes mutilate themselves. According to PETA (n.d) in the article “6 BIG Reasons Why Big Cats Don’t Belong in Circuses,” “Tigers are naturally semi-nocturnal and love the water” (para.4). Semi-nocturnal means animals sleep during the day and are active during the nighttime. In the circus, the tigers are forced to perform during the day and they are not allowed to sleep when they want to. Tiger also love water, but they are not given access to any type of watering hole. In the wild, tigers grow up with their mothers, but the Ringling Brothers keep the tigers separated long before causing them to have emotional distress for both the mothers and
Animals should not be kept in captivity for any reason unless they have been harmed and need to receive treatment but they should be released as soon as they are healthy and capable of taking care of themselves again. The use of a captive animal for research, education, or entertainment is just wrong no creature deserves to have their life taken away for our benefit. Would you want to be captured and put in a tiny box or a fake little ecosystem, or abused and tortured because apparently that’s the only possible way to train an animal? How about just knowing that your real life is over and now all you get to do is put on a show for people? That is what we put these animals through for our entertainment we tear children away from their parents. In what way is that right? It’s just like kidnapping we put humans in jail for that but only when it’s another human. People act like just because they aren’t human that its ok and they lie to themselves telling themselves that its okay and that the animal will be taken care of, fed, and have a nice little “fake” forest or desert to live in. Just think of it as having a zoo full of humans, or stealing other humans to make profit or teach someone something new by doing something totally wrong and unethical.
The article “Animals Used as Entertainment” lists rodeos, circuses, bullfighting, horse racing, cockfighting, dog fighting, and zoos as examples of the many ways animals are used in entertainment. Circuses and zoos are the two most relevant forms of animal mistreatment. Both of these are sources of entertainment for children and adults. Zoos declare that the...
Animal rights have unequivocally been a major concern amongst humans for some time now. Animal rights are based on the notion that non-human animals should be allowed to live freely: free from abuse and suffering, as humans are. The extreme issue amongst humans is whether or not non-human animals have the capacity for rationality to deserve such equal consideration. When examining the issue of animal rights, one may have come to question one’s psyche on whether or not animal rights are ethical.