Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Abstract on the importance of bureaucracy
Abstract on the importance of bureaucracy
Abstract on the importance of bureaucracy
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
1. a. As outlined in article 2 of the Constitution, the president as chief legislator and is responsible for shaping policy. The connection between Congress and the executive is one of the most important aspects of government. The Constitution is discrete about the president 's part in legislating, yet the president can collect information for the bureaucracy, give a legislative agenda to Congress, and go to the public for backing his legislative agenda. The president may propose an appeal to Congress, to enact laws he believes are needed. He can try to sway Congress through promises of support and favors. The President stays in touch with Congress formally through written letters, private meetings, parties, and phone calls. When the president gets a bill, he chooses whether to veto it, use the pocket veto, sign it, or do nothing. If the president does nothing, and Congress is still in session 10 days later it becomes law. The president and the bureaucracy is a major foundation of information and influence for the president, but its awkward makeup requires controls and may often work against the president. Retaining control over 2 million employees is a round-the-clock occupation itself. Affiliates of the bureaucracy work to guard their own interest or their departments when in jeopardy of budget cuts. They may overlook the presidents requests and delay or impaired his agenda. To gain the support of his bureaucracy, the president must negotiate and convince the executive offices of the presidency. The president is the chief administrator and the leader of the executive branch of the federal government. This branch administers and carries out the laws passed by the legislative branch and is headed by the president. The executiv... ... middle of paper ... ...tes and municipalities. It is for this purpose that a decrease in federal aid by matching grants to block the grants is happening. This has given the states greater flexibility to execute federally funded programs in curtail federal mandates, devolving the federal responsibilities to lower levels of government. Advocates of block grants believe that block grants increased government proficiency and critics argue that block grants weaken the accomplishments of national objectives. The Supreme Court decided the federal government only has power that is interpreted within the Constitution. Implied powers of the federal government has long been disputed between the federal government and the belief in the sovereignty of the states. The Supreme Court stands by the belief of the sovereignty to the states. Therefore, states are within their rights to implement block grants.
Often, when the discussion of American bureaucracy is broached in conversation, those holding these conversations often think of the many men and women who operate behind the scenes within the government. This same cross section of Americans is looked upon as the real power within the federal government and unlike the other branches of government, has little to no oversight. A search of EBSCO resulted in the following definition, an organization “structure with a rigid hierarchy of personnel, regulated by set rules and procedures” (Bureaucracy, 2007). Max Weber believed that a bureaucracy was technically the most efficient form of organization, one structured around official functions that are bound by rules, each function having its own specified competence (2007). This wide ranging group of Americans has operated within the gaps, behind the scenes, all under the three core branches of government: the legislative, executive, and judicial branches. The division of government into three branches and separate powers gives each branch both exclusive powers and some additional power...
The President of the United States is instrumental in the running of the country. He serves as the chief executive, chief diplomat, commander in chief, chief legislator, chief of state, judicial powers, and head of party. Article II of the Constitution states that the President is responsible for the execution and enforcement of the laws created by Congress. He also is tasked with the authority to appoint fifteen leaders of the executive departments which will be a part of the President’s cabinet. He or she is also responsible for speaking with the leaders the CIA and other agencies that are not part of his cabinet because these agencies play a key role in the protection of the US. The President also appoints the heads of more than 50 independent
Congress and The Presidency Congress as a whole makes laws. When Bills are addressed they must meet the approval of both the House and the Senate in order to become a Law, and then the President can always veto it. Congress also deals with matters of public concern be it something that needs to be investigated or something that needs to be put before the public to raise awareness. Congress is made up of two parts: The Senate and the House of Representatives. Each is granted different powers and responsibilities.
In order to run more efficiently, there are certain responsibilities that Congress has given to the President over time. But that doesn’t mean Congress is losing any power or authority. It just means that they are giving up a responsibility that they don’t need. One of these responsibilities that were given to the President is the raising and lowering of tariffs. When it came to this issue, Congress can’t act decisively on its own. So even though Congress appropriates funds, they gave the President this fiscal responsibility. Again I want to stress that they didn’t lose any authority or power because of this. All they lost was a responsibility that they no longer have to worry about as it’s the President’s responsibility now. Still, the president has no authority or power regarding this issue. However, when he was given this fiscal responsibility, Congress also gave him staff assistance in the form of the Bureau of the Budget. This department helps the President make up the budget he wants to propose.
The presidential role as Chief legislator is not written in the National Constitution, it is, however, one of the created major roles that the president must fulfill. Chief legislator is defined in the as the president having an influence on making and recommending laws to congress. For example, it allows the president to either accept bills into law or veto (denying) bills from becoming law. Speaking of vetoes, the veto power has developed into a powerful instrument of the President’s leadership in legislation (Binkley, 1956). Meaning, the president has the ability to threaten to veto a bill as a tool to spook Congress into changing a part of legislation that the president does not agree with. Being chief legislator is one of the many hats that the president wears while in office that grants him/her a persuasive voice in the legislation process as well as recommending legislation to
From the inception of the Constitution, there has always been a power struggle between the President and Congress. In the beginning, Madison and the Jeffersonians were placed in a gridlock with Hamilton and his school of political philosophy. Andrew Jackson fought to extend the powers of the President, then Congress spent 50 years fighting to repeal the powers of the Executive. Abraham Lincoln refined Jacksonian presidential politics, then Congress impeached his successor, Andrew Johnson, for fear of another quasi -- tyrannical President. Even today, a Congress, whose majority is of the same party as the President, fights 24 hours a day to check the power of President George W. Bush. But why, and how? Inherent Power Struggles Within the Constitution: Article I, Section I -- "All legislative powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and a House of Representatives" VS. Article II, Section I -- "The executive power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America" Article II, Section II -- "The President shall be the Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several states, when called into the actual service of the United States" - The Founders' ambiguous and contradicting language sets the stage for a power struggle between the Executive and the Legislative branches - Being that the Founders were political masterminds, they realized that unique circumstances would demand some deviations from the restraints that the Constitution places on both the Executive and the Legislature - Founders anticipated that during times of crisis', the nation would need ...
The executive branch comes with Executive freedoms. The President has certain powers, such as permitting pardons for federal offenses if need be. For example, when Nixon was impeached, President Ford had pardoned him. Even though the Legislative branch makes the laws, the President is the one who puts the laws into action with the support from Congress. However, if the president does not agree with the law trying to be passed, he has the right/power to veto the law. After the president veto’s a bill, the likelihood of that bill becoming a law is very slim. If Congress decides they want to override a veto from the president, two-thirds of both the House of Representatives and Senate must vote agai...
In my opinion, the relationship between the Federal government and the States is unclear whether which institution has the authority to implement legislations. The vagueness of the American constitution particularly in the 10th Amendment of the Constitution that quote ” The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.” The ambiguous of the American Constitution may be the main cause of the over power of Federal government.
The main powers of the executive branch rest with the President of the United States of America. Powers granted to him by the constitution include serving as commander in chief of the armed forces; negotiating treaties; appointing federal judges, ambassadors, and cabinet officials; and acting as head of state. The president also has a cabinet which includes officials such as the attorney general and the secretaries of State, Treasury, Defense, Interior, Agricu...
Bureaucracy, a system of government in which most of the important decisions are made by state officials rather than by elected representatives. Bureaucracy is the way the government appoints large numbers of skilled people who must work together to decide how the daily government activates and decisions must be made. The word bureaucracy means “rule by desks or offices”. Many people see bureaucracy as pointless, but without a bureaucracy many people would not be able to begin to understand how to work together to actually accomplish goals. The president also plays a role in bureaucracy. The president is the head of the executive branch, and bureaucracy allows
The power of the Executive branch has expanded over time to become the most authoritative division of government. In contrast to the Constitution 's fundamental designer, James Madison, who predicted the Legislative branch would dominate due to it’s power in making laws and regulating taxes/spending, the executive powers have proven to be superior and ever broadening. From the birth of the Republic, the President has sought to protect his rights and seek beyond his restriction of power. Setting the precedent as early as 1795, George Washington refused to relay documents relating to the Jay Treaty to the House of Representatives and saw his actions as a justified act of “executive prerogative.” Moreover, weaving throughout the Nineteenth century, presidents such as Andrew Jackson and Abraham Lincoln conceived and added functions, such as the extensive use of the veto and the president’s direct and active role as Commander in Chief to their executive tool-belt. The Constitution communicates very little details regarding the President’s use of the power of veto and the role as Commander in Chief, but it was these presidents which established the major authority of the executive branch in these areas.
The Executive branch is all under the President's command, he is the one in charge of the final decisions. The Executive may veto the bill, all the hard work from the rest of the branches for the Executive to deny the bill. It also enforces laws which can be a major responsibility. It can also negotiate foreign treaties with other countries, in other words they inform and talk to other countries about what is happening. The President appoints the federal judge and this judge has his job for life or until he resigns.
Federal limitations to certain amendments, known as federal mandates, have taken power away from the masses. To secure democracy and avoid further abuses of power by the judicial courts, an amendment should be made to the Constitution prohibiting the federal government from putting down mandates that directly interfere with the power given to the states by law. Federal politicians use desultory commands as leverage to ensure that the states comply with their wishes. The federal government cannot tell the states what to do but such schemes are just unfair. An amendment abolishing federal mandates would create a stronger democracy by giving the state legislatures full control over the implementation of laws at the discretion of the voters thus placing power back in the heart of the US democracy, the people, where it belongs.
Even though bureaucracy and red tape are overwhelming the accumulation of federal, state, and local mandates make working with the Discussion Board 4 Govt 475
The executive branch includes the head of government/head of state and their cabinet. As the leader of the state, the executive is considered the “top-tier of government.” Their job is to be the political leader of a country. In the case of