The Ones Who Walk Away From Omelas Critical Analysis

859 Words2 Pages

“The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas” is a short story written by author Ursula K. Le Guin. The story is set in the fictional utopian city of Omelas in which seemingly everyone is happy and lives a contented life. All of the town’s citizens are aware of a cellar in Omelas where a destitute, abused young boy is imprisoned in squalor. The very existence of Omelas and the happiness of its residents depends solely on the suffering of the young boy. If the boy was saved from his pitiful condition or shown the compassion he deserves, all of Omelas would come apart at that moment. The residents of Omelas know that they must realize the iniquity in their society to be able to appreciate the good they reap from it. Faced by an awareness of the oppression they inflict upon the innocent boy to preserve the happiness of the rest of Omelas, they rationalize the boy’s suffering, blurring the lines between what is truly good and truly evil. In the opening of “The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas” the citizens of Omelas are depicted as happy-go-lucky people alive in a society free from much of the negative tumult humanity is regularly subjected to yet justifies; dark institutions …show more content…

in “The Scapegoat” 1509)?” It is not clearly the idea that good does not exist without evil that Le Guin begs us to question in “The Ones Who Walked Away from Omelas”, but rather what is in fact good versus what is in fact evil. If one is compelled to repulsion at a necessary evil their lifestyle is dependent upon, when does the indifference they espouse toward the said evil decide what is unquestionably evil and what is

Open Document