The Most Important Contribution to Eucharist Theology

592 Words2 Pages

The Most Important Contribution to Eucharist Theology

The reconciliation of the physical world and faith has always been difficult, especially in regards to the Eucharist and accepting bread and wine to actually be the body and blood of Christ. Father Sergius Belgakov's The Holy Grail and the Eucharist examines the most important contribution to Eucharistic Theology by an Orthodox theologian. He insists on a "properly Christological" and Gospel-based interpretation of the sacrament, while acknowledging Thomas Aquinas' interpretations as well as the Aristotelian differentiation between substance and accident.

Fr. Sergius Belgakov states that according to Catholic theology, the Eucharist consists of a "supernatural union" of the substance of Christ's body and blood, deprived of their accidents, with the accidents of the bread and wine, which have been deprived of their substance. In this way the body and blood are offered under the appearance of bread and wine. In regards to the real presence of Christ in the Eucharist, Belgakov recognizes the contradiction between the idea of the Lord's ascension and the "Lord Himself mysteriously return[ing] to the earth and abid[ing] in the host." (page 81) In opposition, he asks that one "return[s] to the theology of the fathers, to the patristic doctrine" and to not just restate but completely the change the question being asked about the presence of Christ and the substance of Christ's body and blood.

Belgakov goes on to examine the understanding of the heavenly food in connection with earthly food. When we eat, food, a thing of the external world becomes human body blood; thus, a natural transubstantiation occurs. In itself the food sustains mortal life, but does not assure ...

... middle of paper ...

...till reaffirm their faith in the Catholic Church, it is an indication not of blind faith, but of true understanding and a meaningful relationship with the Church and with God. It must be kept in mind that his arguments are valid and some definitely ring true as catholic, and can be used to process ones own beliefs. Especially in regards to a sacrament as mystifying as the Eucharist in which the beliefs of today's society and scientific evidence must be put aside, purely receiving the sacrament on faith is difficult, while an understanding of the history and the different opinions regarding the body and blood of Christ in the bread and wine may allow for the "validation" of the sacrament for oneself. In a time of increasing skepticism and atheism, it is critical to examine ones faith and question it, and no longer accept merely tradition for the sake of tradition.

Open Document