The Moral Life Of Babies Analysis

1719 Words4 Pages

“The Moral Instinct” According to the dictionary the word moral is defined as the relating to, or concerned with the principles or rules of right conduct or the distinction between right or wrong: ethical. Meaning that everyone has a sense of moral, it’s our ability to put into practice our knowledge of right or wrong and that’s what makes us unique, our perspectives vary. In the article “The moral instinct” published in the New York Times on January 2008 professor of psychology Steven Pinker analyses morality from different points of views and explains how it influences in our daily lives. In this essay I’m going to examine Pinker’s article along with two other sources called “The Moral life of Babies” by Paul Bloom where he exemplifies how …show more content…

The experiment was about three puppets playing, two of them were “playing nice” they were passing each other a ball, but when they passed the ball to the third puppet, he would run away with it. When they brought the puppets to the boy they were set up with a pile of treats in front of them, the task was to take a way a treat from one puppet, so he did, he took a treat from the “bad” puppet but for their surprise the boy did not think such punishment was enough so he hit the puppet in the head for his actions. Therefore, Bloom concludes that “people everywhere have some sense of right and wrong”. Who would have known that a one-year-old boy, someone who you think has a lack of morality, in fact has a sense of it, maybe he does not have the complete knowledge yet, but there is something as such a young age in the life of a human being. In addition to this experiment he adds that our morality is based on “good acts should be meet with a positive response and bad acts with a negative response” that’s why the baby took justice into his hands, the puppet got what he …show more content…

That boy felt the consequences of pushing her sister, there was an emotion of discomfort. Although at the same time Kahn qualifies Pinker and Bloom because she adds that “callous-unemotional kids don’t develop the same aversion to punishment or to the experience of hurting someone”. Meaning there is no emotion, there’s no existence of control of

Open Document