The Miseducation Of Cameron Post Analysis

The Absurdity of Censorship and Banned Books Emily Danforth’s The Miseducation of Cameron Post is an engaging, meaningful novel, but one would only know that if he or she actually read the book. Others challenge the book because of the troubling passages, heavy content, and intense language. In fact, the majority of opposing people have not even read the book to appreciate its contribution to young adult literature. Rather, these people are consumed by the deep content that is strewn throughout the pages. From a generalized perspective, I think that this reluctant attitude comes from an uncomfortableness of and ignorance to important stages or events in an adolescent’s life. Having read this novel prior to Professor Danforth’s explication,

Yes, there were explicit words here and there, but not enough to detract in any way from the book. I completely agree with Professor Danforth that many people are uneducated and uncomfortable with the coming of age of a lesbian teen. I think that this topic is difficult for people to accept, and I think that this book was challenged primarily for this reason. I feel as though people focused on the language as a safe way to ban the book from school curriculums. I find this very sad, because adolescents can certainly learn from this book. Considering the hardships that gay and lesbian teens face, I would recommend this book to them as an outlet to explore and develop a personal comfortableness. I think that this book is very valuable and can certainly help people accept homophobia in a more positive way, but the banning of this book probably made it even more difficult for teens to express their homosexual desires. For this reason, I am very angered by the negative attention that engulfed this book, and this pessimism derived from uneducated, bigoted people. It is sad, because I am sure that this book means a lot to