Running head: J. EDGAR HOOVER 2
For someone to say, “ It’s probably better to have him inside the tent pissing out, than outside the tent pissing in,” means it is better to get a powerful person on your side rather than having them lined up against you. Is this really necessary? President Lyndon Johnson said this in a New York times interview in 1971 when describing J. Edgar Hoover. J. Edgar Hoover was not a well liked man. His leadership style is still being scrutinized and discussed long after his death. His leadership of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) is legendary. The movie J.Edgar (2011) outlined his life and his rise to power within the FBI. J. Edgar Hoover
EDGAR HOOVER 4
within an organization allows each member to receive the necessary tools to run their immediate work functions. It also allows the leader to see how that function connects to the rest of the organization. Hoover was always aware of what everyone in his organization was doing as all times. Raelin (2003) also described four aspects of leaderful practice. He called them the Four Tenets of Conventional Leadership; concurrent, collective, collaborative, and compassionate. The definition alone of these four words is opposite of the kind of leader that Hoover was. He did not allow anyone to be in power with him, did not have multiple leaders, did not consider anyones views except his own, and he was the opposite of compassionate. He was not concerned about anyones dignity other than his own, and he did everything in his power to preserve it. Heifetz (2001) stated that followers want stability and comfort from their leaders. Heifetz considered that “babysitting.” Heifetz argues that real leaders ask hard questions and knock people out of their comfort zones. This leadership style clearly describes J.Edgar Hoover. When Hoover took control of the FBI he forced the agents to change to the way he wanted them to look. He required a certain dress code and personal appearance from all his
EDGAR HOOVER 5
speaking. Task oriented leaders maintain a “closed door” policy (Hackman, 2009). Hoover made demands in a loud, boisterous way to his agents. His agents were never allowed to discuss any grievances with him. If his agents did not like the way something was done, they either did it anyway or were fired. Only complete loyalty appeased Hoover; the smallest slight was likely to be interpreted as betrayal. Hoover’s followers could be described in two ways; conformists and passive. Conformist followers are committed to the organization 's goals but express very few of their own thoughts to the leader. Such followers are often referred to as “yes men/women” and tend to hold back their ideas out of fear of the leader. Passive followers show very little originality. They rely profoundly on the leaders direction (Hackman, 2009). Although passive followers can also be described as having a lack of skills or no commitment, Hoover’s followers did not meet this description. Could this be due to the fear factor first? It was clearly portrayed in the movie that his followers (agents) were afraid of him. They conformed to his expectations for fear of losing their job or being publicly harassed into
Leadership is portrayed at its pinnacle in William Bratton’s Turnaround, Rudolph Giuliani’s book Leadership, Oren Harari’s book The Leadership Secrets of Colin Powell, and David Lipsky’s book Absolutely American: Four Years at West Point. In each of these works, the author does an exceptional job of depicting the various traits and characteristics necessary for being a powerful and effective leader.
The Web. 1 Dec. 2013. http://www.jstor.org/> http://www.jstor.org/>. Hoover, Edgar J. COINTELPRO Black Extremist Part 01 of 23. N.d.
...mess the country was already in and knew that initially that the country as a whole is more important than him. The mess that was taking place during his term was the Vietnamese War. Wars are a really big deal, so it does not just take one person to deal with them, but many. Johnson sought a helping hand with Nixon. But it turns out that Nixon stabbed Johnson in the back and they don’t get along now because of the back-stabbing.
“Mitchell Palmer started the General Intelligence” (http://law2.umkc.edu) or the anti-radical Division of Bureau Investigation on August 1, 1919, with Edgar Hoover another Justice Department employee. The mission o...
History of the FBI The Federal Bureau of Investigation was founded in 1908 when the Attorney General appointed an anonymous force of 34 Special Agents to be investigators for the Department of Justice. Before that, the DOJ had to borrow agents from the U.S. Secret Service. In 1909, the Special Agent Force was renamed the Bureau of Investigation, and after countless name changes, it became The Federal Bureau of Investigation in 1935. When the FBI was established, there weren't an abundance of federal crimes, so it investigated criminal acts that dealt with national banking, bankruptcy, naturalization, antitrust, peonage, and land fraud. In June of 1910, the FBI grew larger because of the "Mann Act" (Made it a crime to transport women to other states for immoral reasons).
In the 21st century, the world as we know it suffers from psychotic, demented, treacherous and, sophisticated crimes. This world would be corrupt without a tunnel of light if it was not for the Federal Bureau of Investigation. The Federal Bureau of Investigation, also known as the FBI, is a corporation that seeks fidelity, bravery and, integrity for the United States of America. The FBI researches shocking and concerning crimes the news reports about politics, war and, safety that we hear on the television about issues that are being reported to the people. These cases of transgression are missions the FBI analyzes, such as hacking information from double spies, locating terrorists, seeking pedophiles, cracking down unknown mobsters, gang leaders and serial killers, white-collar crime, public corruption, cyber-crime, counter intelligence and civil rights.
In this book, the authors Tom Rath and Barry Conchie examine the question “What are the keys to being an effective leader?” To answer this question they had a team that reviewed data collected from Gallup polls. The data came from interviews from 20,000 senior leaders, over a million teams and more than fifty years of Gallup Polls of the most admired leaders in the world. The authors then had the team do a study of more than 10,000 followers to find out why they follow the influential leaders in their life.
Throughout the history of the United States there has been extraordinary individuals both in business and government that have demonstrated their abilities to be affective leaders among the people in which they are in charge of. There are many definitions of what a leader is and what characteristics a leader should have. One man that demonstrates all aspects of a leader and that has been deemed on the list of one of the greatest presidents who has ever served respectfully belongs to Franklin D. Roosevelt.
G-man was a slang word for special agents that were working under the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) of the US government. This special agents that were put together by the US government existed to stop any illegal transactions and crimes. The detectives that were working under J. Edgar Hoover’s Bureau of Investigation were consisted of small quantities of detectives that the public often mistaken them with the Secret Service or Prohibition Bureau agents. The slang word ‘G-man’ is created during the arrest of George “Machine Gun” Kelly, a gangster and wanted for fugitive reason. When the special agents of the FBI found “Machine Gun” Kelly on September 26, he shouted the specific words of “Don't shoot, G-Men! Don't shoot, G-Men!”. Early
Our world is filled with many successful leaders. The gift of being a leader can be learned; however some individuals have a natural born talent to be a leader. Each leader has his or her own unique leadership style. The gift of being a leader can be learned. Certain individuals are born with a charismatic style and can easily be a leader. A successful leader is one who can inspire and motivate people towards a goal. Martin Luther King Jr. was an individual with a born gift to lead people. The following paper will discuss how Martin Luther King Jr. was able to inspire and motivate people with his effective leadership style.
There isn’t a perfect way to lead and while some may be stubborn to certain ways, eventually it will be tested and the ultimate answer comes through the success of that leader. Philip Purcell led with a coercive style; demanding his way was the way. Sumner Redstone believed in empowering his employees and allowing them to be a part of the success; he led using a democratic style. Lastly, Martha Stewart was old school and always gave direct orders and expected them to be followed; she led using the authoritative style. All very different styles with amazing success; finding the right approach is the most important aspect of
Throughout life one faces many situations therefore coming into contact with a variety of different people, in turn making relationships that one can learn from. It is from the opportunities we have working with others that we form our own personal leadership traits. There are many different leadership styles and over the course of the many opportunities that I have to serve as a leader, I have not only developed, but formed my personal leadership style. In his book, The 21 Irrefutable Laws of Leadership, John Maxwell explores laws that include aspects of leadership such as laws that can be learned, laws that stand alone, and laws that carry consequences, but all are the foundations of leadership. As a past and present leader of a variety of
Have you ever had a leader that inspired you to develop your own leadership traits? “A leader is someone who demonstrates what’s possible” (Mark Yarnell, 2015). There are numerous leadership styles. Each of the numerous leadership styles can be beneficial if utilized in an appropriate means. I have chosen three leaders and their unique leadership styles to discuss in this paper. The unique styles that will be discussed are situational leadership, transformational leadership, and laissez-faire leadership. I will also discuss each leader’s approaches, their fundamental leadership principles, and how each leader used their style within their profession.
Bennis, W. & Nanus, B. (1985). Leaders: The Strategies for taking charge. New York: Harper Row.
Leadership and the study of it has roots in the beginning of civilization, Egyptian rulers, Greek heroes, and biblical patriarchs all have one thing in common-leadership (THE HISTORY OF LEADERSHIP FOCUS,2005). There are numerous definitions and theories of leadership, however there are enough similarities in the definitions to conclude that leadership is the effort of influence and the power to induce compliance (Wren,1995).The organizational focus of the leader has evolved over this same period, early organizations with authoritarian leaders who believed employees were intrinsically lazy transitioned into way to make work environments more conducive to increased productivity rates (THE HISTORY OF LEADERSHIP FOCUS,2005).