The Iowa Model Of Evidence-Based Practice

Iowa Model of Evidence-Based Practice Research in nursing is an important concept in which information is gained to increase the efficiency and effectiveness of nursing practice (Bjørk et al., 2013). One way in which research can be deciphered and utilized is through the application of research translation models. These models are frameworks for the development and application of evidence-based practice in various health-care settings (Polit & Beck, 2012). Numerous models are in existence and they all offer a variety of methods in which to translate topics of interest and issues into research-based evidence for the use in clinical practice (Polit & Beck, 2012). One such model is the Iowa model of evidence-based practice to promote quality

If they decide that there is ample material on the specific topic at hand, the team moves on to the next phase of the Iowa model. If sufficient amounts of research do not exist on the subject, a research study may need to be carried out (Brown, 2014). This stage also consists of the research team evaluating the rigor of the research that they have collected (Doody & Doody, 2011). It is important to have an analysis procedure in place for all members of the research team to follow when evaluating research studies to ensure consistency in the appraisal of the quality and precision of each research study found (Doody & Doody, 2011). According to Doody & Doody (2011), “effectiveness, appropriateness, and feasibility” (p. 663) are three of the grading standards that researchers can use in evaluating research studies.
The next stage is for the team to jointly develop an evidence-based practice standard based on the information compiled during the research process (Doody & Doody, 2011). An important concept of evidence-based practice as pointed out by Doody & Doody (2011) is the involvement of the patient in the development of new standards. The developed standard should apply to the research topic that is being addressed, however; it should also be modified from person to person based on morals and values for the standard to truly be evidence-based (Doody & Doody,