Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
What are the motives behind crime
Criminal interrogations psychology
Criminal motivation theory
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: What are the motives behind crime
The interrogation room is seen from two opposite views. The suspect sees it as the end. The place where their life either comes crashing down, or a place to provide information that could lead to an arrest. The detective sees it simply as his work space. Both views see the Out, however. The imaginary window to the outside world somewhere in the room. The suspects see this as the thing that will help them through this time of their life. It is what will help them answer every question in a believable manner, and every excuse that will come off as legitimate. Most guilty suspects are looking for the Out the moment they walk into the interrogation room. Detectives wait for suspects to try and find a way to use the Out to their advantage, and then they start asking the real questions. They ask the questions that someone would only answer truthfully if they were truly innocent, or if they were looking for a way to ease some of the potential consequences they might face. The intended audience of this passage ranges from those that are fascinated by criminal law and the interrogation process, to psychologists studying the behaviors of suspects while they are in the interrogation room. The purpose of this passage is to inform readers of the different behaviors of suspects in interrogation rooms, and how many suspects seek the Out before being asked questions …show more content…
Sometimes those who commit crimes do not intend to hurt or kill someone, and that can leave a permanent emotional scar on a person. Not everyone who has committed a crime is a bloodthirsty monster. Sometimes people just end up in situations they cannot get out
As a result of Ford’s threatening interrogatories, the four suspects made a false confession, in which they stated that they committed the murder. The tight, dark room and the long time the interrogatories took made the four men subject to Ford’s psychological abuse and falsely confessed. Most of them said that they told him what he wanted to hear. The author Chapman (2013) argued that, “psychological research is applied to interrogation, the result can be that the officer already believes that the suspect committed the crime and is not likely to take no as an answer,” (p.162).
After reviewing the article “Inside Interrogation: The Lie, The Bluff, and False Confessions”, it became very evident the huge problem with interrogations and false confessions in the criminal justice system is with false confession. Jennifer T. Perillo and Saul M. Kassin crafted three distinct experiments to try and better understand false confessions and how trues the actual numbers in real life are. What Perillo and Kassin were trying to prove is that “the bluff technique should elicit confessions from perpetrators but not from innocents” (Perillo, Kassin 2010). What is called the “Bluff Technique” is an interrogation technique that uses a sort of threat or hint that there is certain proof that a person will think is more of a promise for
In order to incriminate Danial Williams, Joseph Dick, Eric Wilson, and Derek Tice with the rape and murder of Michelle Moore-Bosko, Detectives Maureen Evans and Robert Ford conducted long, grueling interrogation sessions using many provocative and manipulative tactics. Throughout this process, Ford and Evans coerced the suspects into renegotiating their perception of the crime until an entirely new reality was created. This new reality evolved as the police elicited additional confessionary evidence to account for each new piece of physical evidence from the crime scene. Eventually, in an iterative process that had police editing their theories of the crime and then forcing the suspects to claim this new reality as their own, the reconciled reality of the crime became one that was consistent with both the criminal evidence and the suspects’ new perception. An analysis of empirical m...
In summation, is can be identified in this paper that eye witnesses do not play a constructive role within the criminal justice system. This can be seen through a thorough discussion of the many issues portrayed through this paper. To conclude Schmechel et al. (2006) reiterates that statements this paper has presented and discussed;
Emotions get the best of everyone in stressful situations, but what about those without any emotions to spare? The media glamorizes murders and serial killers by making them the spotlight of movies, shows and novels. What readers and viewers often forget is that these people are real and have resided on the same street that their kids ride bikes on. The people that commit these horrendous crimes are often known as sociopaths. Not all sociopaths become serial killers, but the combination of abusive childhood, environment and genetic influences pushes them to repeatedly kill and take innocent lives.
Redlich, A. D. (2007). Double jeopardy in the interrogation room for youths with mental illness. American Psychologist. doi:10.1037/0003-066X62.6.609
Torture is one of the most extreme methods of eliciting information; unfortunately, it has been used for centuries and is still prevalent worldwide.
Many of today’s interrogation models being utilized in police investigations have an impact on false confessions. The model that has been in the public eye recently is the social psychological process model of interrogation known as the “The Reid Technique.” There are two alternatives used by the police today to replace the Reid Technique, one is the PEACE Model and the other is Cognitive Interviewing. These methods are not interrogation techniques like Reid but interview processes.
Byrd, S. (2005). On getting the reasonable person out of the courtroom. Journal of Criminal Law. 571-571. Retrieved from http://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/osjcl2&div=41&id=&page=
The Forensic interview technique is a result of the increasing awareness of child abuse and neglect cases in the United States in the last quarter of the 20th century (Newlin et al, 2015). Forensic interviewing has come a long way from when it was first being developed and has continuously evolved to have the best outcome for children. The purpose of Forensic interviewing is to be more child friendly, to consider the age and development of the child, and to be cognizant of a child’s trauma which is specified in the “Purpose of the Child Forensic Interview” and “Considerations Regarding the Child” sections of the Newlin article. Forensic interviewing has become more specialized and developed since it first began to be utilized. It has developed
Severence, L., Goodman, J., & Loftus, E. (1992). Inferring the criminal mind: Toward a bridge between legal doctrine and psychological understanding. Journal Of Criminal Justice, 20. 107-120.
The murders committed are not just random, as we saw with the hit men. These organized killers typically are aware of the police system and know how to make their way around it. “The organized serial killer is often familiar with police procedures and takes great pride in thwarting investigations and taunting law enforcement officials by the careful placement or concealment of evidence” (Miller 5.6.1). This organization and careful placement allow the serial killer to become exceedingly dangerous, allowing them to accomplish their crimes. This adds to their motives that it is easy and there are no consequences. This allows the murder to continue to kill for their own personal reasons with no remorse. What adds to the aspect of a serial killer other than no remorse is the social alienation which we see often in the non typical serial killer due to the fact that they like normal serial killers, are often loners (Culhane 32). The hit man is another example of the non typical serial killer, yet he still follows this social alienation in his life. Even the most non typical killers have this social alienation in common whether it is before and continues after or during their kill
I wanted to look at the investigative and criminal procedures following the arrest of an alleged criminal and the powerful effects via testimonies and evidence (or lack thereof) it can have on a case.There is an importance of the courts in regards to crime that can’t be over looked. The primary function of the criminal justice system is to uphold the established laws, which define what we understand as deviant in this society.
Unfortunately some crimes are driven by needs of survival; despite the consequences one can infer that once given little options a person will do whatever means necessary in order to survive it’s instinctive.
While child abuse does not always result in a serial killer, the aftermath of the neglect and abuse is unforeseeable and can have many alternate routes. The researchers were trying to answer the question of if there was a common factor that many or all serial killers shared that could have attributed to their psychological issues. From the research gathered, it would appear that child abuse is a common factor, however it is not guaranteed that all serial killers experience child abuse and not all children that experience abuse will become serial killers. Some problems posed with this research is that an extensive amount of the information obtained was from an unconnected third party, therefore the truthfulness of the information must be scrutinized. Also, some criminals may lie about their past. Some may say that they were abused to have an explanation for their heinous crimes, or some may downplay their past because they do not wish to disclose vulnerable aspects of their life. In all, the child abuse among lust serial killers could be considered to be a factor in their murderous actions. It is warned, however, to not generalize these findings to all serial killers, as the information gathered was determined off a group of lust serial