Conversation is the form of vital interaction and communication between two or more individuals verbally or in written form. Conversation is very significant and it is an effective way of not only sharing information but also about socializing. There are various ways through which communication can be passed depending on the relationship between the individuals. There are various ways of communication, including phone calls and texting. There are people who prefer texting while others prefer phone calls. This issue has brought a debate regarding the most favorable way of communication, especially to teenagers and those in colleges. Currently, many young people and even the old people in the community prefer texting to phone calls. The wide
Cullington in her article “Does Texting Affect Writing?” highlights both views of texting. People who support texting especially for students say that it is an effective way of building individuals’ confidence among students who are not confident enough to communicate with others. They believe that through texting, students are able to construct meaningful and concrete information. Supporters such as David Crystal believe that texting provides extra practice to those students who are not able to convey information. He believes that texting helps the student to know how to express themselves in the shortest possible way and in clear form. Crystal further explains that students who are not proficient with language will not be able to text and convey the required message. This means that texting not only improves the skills of the student but also does affect them negatively. From his argument, it can be seen that she advocates for writing as an effective, interesting and most effective way of improving and establishing language in students. She believes that texting facilitates language development and knowledge as students are able to learn new things
Some of the views in this essay are similar to those of Cullington while others are different. Turkle particularly focuses on technology and psychology to support texting. She explains that psychologically, many people find it much easier to open up in private or when hidden than in public. She uses an example of a seventeen years old girl, Elaine who completely hates phone calls. In her essay, she explains that most teenagers and young people are more comfortable and free with texting than phone calls. Because through texting, individuals are able to share their innermost and intimate issue. Technology is also used as a factor contributing to texting. Emails and other messaging application have made many people resort to texting than phone calls due to their flexibility and convenience. Another reason which makes people prefer texting is that it gives people a chance and time to think about a situation before giving their opinion or answer. The essay highlights an explanation on Audrey who is a sixteen years old and is not at all impressed with the idea of her calling. She prefers being texted instead of being called by the
In the article, “Stop Googling”. Let’s Talk” author Sherry Turkle wants to tell the reader that people should value and respect their relationships by replacing smartphones with face-to-face conversations. She is a professor who has been studying psychology for around 30 years; she uses many other psychologists studies to prove that people are relying on smartphones too much and start to replace conversations with texting. In the essay, she explains how the smartphone is becoming an essential part of American lives which later affects people’s way of communication. She also provides several solutions for people to solve the negative effects that come from those devices so people can learn how to push back against it and start to engage more in the conversation to benefit yourself and society.
This is where she uses ethos to provide the reader with an understanding that she is a credible writer. First she uses the National Center for Education Statistics information to provide a strong base of knowledge regarding the topic that is already available. The article from the National Center for Education Statistics includes a quote from a teacher stating “the use of acronyms and shorthand in text messages for students’ inability to spell and ultimately to write well” (pg. 2). She goes on to explain teacher’s viewpoints and their beliefs on the topic after seeing a decrease in writing abilities. There is a quote included by Naomi Baron, a professor at American University, in which states “so much of American society has become sloppy and laissez faire about the mechanics of writing” (pg.2). This quote provides evidence that everyone should be concerned about the effects because our society is facing the issues as well not only students. As she continues to provide a foundation for others ideas regarding the topic, she changes viewpoints to those who see the positives in texting. Cullington uses an author to elaborate on the positives that increased texting can have on individuals. David Crystal explains that students “sharpen their diplomatic skills . . . [because] it allows more time to formulate their thoughts and express them carefully” (pg.4). This is something that is important in today’s day and age where people want the short and sweet version, not something drawn out that can be hard to understand. In her background information regarding the positive aspects of texting, she uses emotions to connect with the reader when she discusses children who struggle with writing. Texting can help students “overcome their awkwardness and develop their social and communication skills” Crystal states (pg. 5). The use of emotion is key to capturing
Instead of trying to draw in the readers with mostly facts he brings up things that are very rare and unlikely. This seems more of an essay of him showing his hatred rather than giving us facts of why texting is bad. Although he did have facts many of them were still very biased and overdrawn. His strong usage of vocabulary toward this not only made me resent his thoughts but turn against
In our world there are many forms of communication and these devices are beginning to take a toll on our younger generations. In Jeffery Kluger’s article,” We Never Talk Anymore: The Problem with Text Messaging,” the idea that younger generations are becoming socially inept due to technology is discussed. As these younger generations consume texting as a main form of communication other important social skills deteriate.
A recent outbreak in teen texting is taking a toll on their daily lives. Many teenagers have cell phones. Their parents get them phones for their safety and well-being, but is that what teens really use them for? I for one know that I rarely call my parents or use my phone for important reasons. Most of the time, I’m scrolling through Instagram and snapchat, to keep up with everyone that I will see in less than a day. The editorial from The Jersey Journal, called Teens are going to extremes with texting, informs the common people of the statistics of teen texting. The editorials main argument is communicating the excessiveness of teen texting. The author develops this point through expert uses of word choice, but also extreme examples and statistics.
“Our generation doesn't ring the doorbell. They text or call to say they're outside,” this line is from one of the well-known social networks, Tweeter, which shows how the way of communication has change in this modern life. According to 2013 statistics by Business Insider, in United States alone, smartphone owners aged 18 to 24 send 2,022 texts per month on average — 67 texts on a daily basis — and receive another 1,831 texts (Cocotas). Nowadays, technology such as text messaging has practically replaced traditional face to face communication among the society primarily in young generations because texting allows messages to be sent fast and effortless. In order to quickly type what they are trying to say in text messaging, people are frequently using textspeak; the language created by using abbreviation rather than complete words. Based on this phenomenon, David Crystal, an honorary professor of linguistics at the University of Wales has published an article entitled ‘2b or not 2b?’ in the Guardian on July 5, 2008 comes out with the research and studies that state texting can actually improve the literacy of children and create creativity of writing. However, by observing more critically, texting do decrease a person’s ability to switch between textspeak and the normal rules of grammar and adversely affect formal writing and conversational skills.
In the article Turkle talks about positives and negatives so it doesn’t really focus on one aspect. Technology has a lot of pros and cons, and even the most technologically advanced person can agree with that. She starts the article with a short story about a teenage girl that depends on technology to communicate with her friends. This is also one of the main topics of her article, Turkle believes that phone calls are avoided because of the immediate need for a response. Turkle states, “The advantage of screen communication is that it is a place to reflect, retype, and edit.” (Turkle 374) During phone calls you really don’t have the advantage of taking the time to form a response whereas in texting like Turkle said you have time to think about what you’re going to say. This gives people a way to form an identity that they want others to see. A lot of shy and socially awkward people love technology because of this, it is an easier way to express the person they wish they were. Turkle writes: “It’s only on the screen that shy people open up.” (Turkle 380) Texting and emailing allow people to reveal and hide any aspect of their lives. Being behind a computer screen gives people the confidence and anonymity that they don’t have face to face or even on the phone. Turkle also mentions another teenage girl Audrey, that feels ignored by her mother because she seems
In the article, “Does Texting Affect Writing?”, the author Michaela Cullington conveys her speculation that texting does not correlate to how students write formal essays. At the beginning of the article Cullington introduces the term texting and the convenience texting brings. Later expressing her concern that the texting language “Textspeak” is actually affecting students writing; then contradicts these views by using primary and secondary sources (news articles, books, her own surveys and research). In addition, she uses an anecdote to tell of her own experience with texting and writing. Together with other evidences and research put together, she uncovers the debate between textspeak and formal writing. On the basis of her research, she concludes that the state of texting does not interfere with writing or writing abilities.
In the article “The Rule of Thumbs” Moore discusses the use of text messages in a romantic relationship. Also, she points out the negative effects that the new generation of technology has had on today 's relationships and she clearly gives her thoughts on how technology interferes with today 's relationships, with the consequences that technology is slowly killing romance. This essay expresses many strong points about the use of texting and I lean towards Natalie Moore’s opinion because texting has strongly changed the way we communicate, unite, and become literate. After all, while analyzing the role that text messaging demonstrates for communication today, it has open four main arguable points that if it is discussed it would be easy to realize that texting is a hard issue overcome. In other words, texting not only has become part of our life today and it has reduced face to face interaction, but also texting has destroyed dating and the way people write or communicate to one
Text messaging has become a norm in our generation, as technology rapidly advances and gives way to more efficient forms of communication in a fast-paced world; and many are skeptical about the influence this new form of interaction is having on our society, especially with our younger generation. David Crystal, a professor at the University of Wales, writes “2b or Not 2b?” in support of text messaging. He insists, despite those who underestimate or negate the beneficial influence text messaging has on language proficiency, that “there is increasing evidence that [texting] helps rather than hinders literacy” and that the fairly recent form of communication has actually been around for a while and “is merely the latest manifestation of the human ability to be linguistically creative and to adopt language to suit the demands of diverse settings. In contrast, Jeffery Kluger argues in “We Never Talk Anymore: The Problem with Text Messaging” that text messaging is rapidly becoming a substitute for more genuine forms of communication and is resulting in difficulty among young peoples of our generation to hold a face-to-face conversation, engage in significant nonverbal expression, and ultimately build effective relationships with family, friends and co-workers. Both writers’ present valid arguments, however, my personal experience with text messaging has led me to agree more with Crystal’s view on the matter. Text messaging is indeed having a positive effect on society by making frequent texters primarily aware of the need to be understood, as well as offering betterment of spelling and writing through practice, and reinventing and expanding on a bygone dimension of our language through the use of rebuses and abbreviations.
Old fashioned phone conversations are more sincere. They allow people to talk on a personal level, even though they may not be physically next to each other. Phone conversations allow people to have a closer look to your inner personality and a sense of understanding is developed. Yet, if phone calls grow sincere conversations, then why do people prefer texting instead of phone calls? "The more ri...
You can say that overuse in texting is determination the way teens, students write formally in the classroom. Teens that spend most of their eyes on their phone has already created their own texting style. Now I am able to answer the question, how does texting affect teen literacy? Texting affects teen literacy because, text messaging does affect our grammar because, teens text like for example; “ttyl”, “gtg”, “wyd”. They find an easy way of texting rather than using the correct way. In order to get what they want done, we wanted to see and learn about the damage that texting can cause on teens and we did learn, we learned that it can affect our grammar, grades, and even your future in trying to get a job, your skills in so much more. I wanted to inform the teens about the damage that texting in short terms can do to you. Encourage them not to write in short term because, they are too
Drouin, Michelle, and Claire Davis. “R u txting? Is the Use of Text Speak Hurting Your Literacy?.” Journal of Literacy Research 41.1 (2009): 46-67. Humanities International Complete. EBSCO. Web. 25 Oct. 2011.
“Texting in Class a Growing Problem.” TheKanson.com. 7 December 2010. Singel, Ryan. The.
Texting is killing language,” Ted starts off the video by saying that “The idea is that texting spells the decline and fall of any kind of serious literacy, or at least writing ability, among young people in the United States and now the whole world today (Ted, 2013). Throughout the film discussion, what stuck out to me the most was how drastic language has changed via technology.