The Importance Of Highbrow Culture

1065 Words3 Pages

According to Bourdieu, knowledge of highbrow culture increases with the level of education and social status, and the more highbrow one is, the more he/she is likely to reject lowbrow culture as vulgarity. In other words, people with higher education are more likely to be cultural exclusive. Peterson and Kern, however, find a tendency of increasing “omnivorousness” in highbrow’s musical taste during the decade of 1982 and 1983. That is, highbrows reported liking more lowbrow genres, which consists of country music, bluegrass, gospel, rock and blues in their study, in 1983 than they did ten years before. This finding contradicts with Bourdieu’s idea of higher status leading to more cultural exclusiveness, or “snobbishness”. Peterson and Kern argue that “omnivorousness” in taste, as opposed to “snobbishness”, does not mean to assign equal amounts of preference to every genre liked, but rather an open attitude towards a wide range of genres. They argue that the reason for this transformation is due to a change in symbolic boundaries between status-groups. Symbolic boundaries, a concept proposed by Emile Durkheim, are …show more content…

Although generally reduced by increased level of education, dislikes are patterned to reflect class-based exclusion. Her findings show that, though people with higher education tend to have less dislikes of musical genres in general, the few genres they dislike are those liked by or representing the culture of the lowest status-group. In addition, the three genres least likely to be rejected are those liked disproportionally by Black and Hispanic people. Therefore, one could observe an omnivorous taste of a high-status person that is more racial tolerant but still reflects class-based exclusion. This tendency is also evidenced in the high-status group’s rejection of racial integration in the community only when it implies class

Open Document