The Great Gatsby Analysis

1449 Words3 Pages

There’s scarcely a surer truth in all literature, than that F. Scott Fitzgerald is fixated upon money, and upon characters who self-destructively dwell upon it. The classic example of this pattern is the eponymous main character of The Great Gatsby, who so ably embodies that tendency. And the above passage, taken from pages in the course’s assigned version, is among the plainest demonstrations thereof. Without over-universalizing these words’ significance, it’s safe to say that they serve as a perfect example of how characters’ entire ontologies hinge upon their having or not having money. Specifically, this scene epitomizes how Gatsby views not only himself, but also Daisy, as being constituted and characterized by her financial means. Before …show more content…

Rather than love, Gatsby formulates these theories of Daisy’s thoughts based upon monetary positionality. He denudes this mentality of his by projecting onto her the same value that he himself places upon money. In other words, he actually reveals how much he defines his own value through his wealth, through his insistence that Daisy does the same. To overuse a term, he projects a certain ontological calculus onto others; and in so doing, lays bare his own. This single line again unravels his doctrine (for lack of a better word) of personal value, placing all the vicissitudes of valuable personhood within financial efficacy. That’s not to say, though, that he’s incorrect in his assessment of Daisy, to at least some degree. It’s merely the fact that he, without necessarily receiving direct confirmation, preemptively assumes that she too views their relationship as a function of …show more content…

By dehumanizing her qualities to those of an inanimate object like a grail, he is discounting her own sentience and independence of thought. He’s essentially reducing her desires and values to being merely those that are fashionable at the time; this in turn exhibits Gatsby’s broader evaluation of the times in which he lives. He views his era as being myopically preoccupied with money, an idea which is simultaneously a product and a producer of his own money-centric psychological complex. Thus he reasons that in order to attract Daisy, this insensate spectre of an entire generation’s virulent materialism, he must ingratiate himself with that elitist enclave. Because, after all, one’s entire ontological composition and significance, are fundamentally rooted in his or her financial

Open Document